Maybe he's ignored the 90%?![]()
hey sandy
if you don't like SpursTalk and think 90% of our posts are trash, why the is you and your Ignore List here?![]()
Maybe he's ignored the ignored by ignoring his ignore list.
Don't mind me, Blackjack, just blowin' yo mind . . .
Lakersground is no different than any other fan site. Note that fan comes from fanatic...what should one expect?
At any rate, the worst fan site I've ever seen in terms of homers and moronic posts/posters was a Spurs site.
No, not this one.
The Lakers have a legitimate shot at that airball three-pointer by Allen. That didn't even hit the rim and yet the Celts got the ball back.
Agreed, I thought that was Laker ball and mentioned it in the thread.
nah, that hit the rim
I guarantee you 100% that it hit the rim.
It changed trajectory, then hit the glass. That wasn't an air-ball.
No ing we lost ...
Yes there was some bad calls but there was some against the Celts too ...
Gasol ed out we dont win if he doesnt play I can live with minimal contributions from the other guys ...
So why do you post so much trash here?
. i haven't seen a more objective post by Lakeshow fan in the last 24 hours. respect.
one play didn't change the game. only kobe showed up to play.
I'm pissed ClubLakers is down again. Happened last sunday. ty servers.
Dead on Killa![]()
"The 2-3-2 format puts too much pressure on the team with HCA"
This is literally a thread on their forum.
![]()
Not sure if the image will show up, but looks to me like it hit rim...
That's a great GIF image. The ball CLEARLY hits the rim there. No room for debate.
thats a tough angle cause the ball can change directory when it hits the backboard as well so its not as simple as the ball moved the end
Way too close to call. If it was ruled to hit rim in real time, it should stay that way. If it was ruled to not hit rim, it should have stayed that way. Not enough evidence either way.
Yeah you can't really tell in that angle maybe from the side it would be easier.
I just don't understand why the league won't widen instant replay to that sort of thing. I mean I can understand not wanting to slow the game down to a crawl replaying any and everything, but when the game is that tight and every possession counts I don't see what the big deal is. I think JVG made that point last night because from what I saw it looked like it definately was an airball.
What the are you talking about? What backboard on this planet is going to cause the ball to move more upward in it's trajectory as it hits? That ball is descending at roughly a 60 degree angle. After it makes contact, it is moving more or equally outward as it is downward, maybe at a 45 degree angle or so. How would hitting the backboard with no rim contact cause this?
This is very simple. The ball hit the rim.
The ball hit the rim. I wasn't sure it did at first but they had an angle on the replay where it showed the ball clearly level off and change trajectory before hitting the backboard.
Watch where the ball changes trajectory and then watch where it hits the bottom of the backboard. You can't hit the backboard twice without hitting the rim and you can clearly see where the ball changes trajectory and where the ball hits the bottom of the backboard.
It's science. Blackjack has spoken.
Another mind blown . . .
Visitng Lakersground is like visiting the Spurs section of this website. Just a bunch of homers.
That GIF shows the truth
I ing told you guys. the ABC commentators are ing clueless, except for JVG.
Ball changed trajectory in a way that only the rim could have done, and it was 100% obvious watching the replays last night.
the GIF only proves it more.
I agree that some are, like some here take too personal.![]()
That hurt. Along with Rons bonehead freethrows. We get the possesion and his free's it's a whole different game down that last min. But it is what it is and you move on to game 6.
Congrats on the win BTW.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)