I get the loyality....but players get old. So, do you stick with Hill/Blair/Splitter...or do you stick with Duncan/Manu/Tony? You cant have both...
ibtl
Must be nice to post pictures and not have an opinion. Are you 12 or 13?
Kids out in full force.
Tony's old?
Duncan and Manu arent?
Actually, I just felt the ridiculous question asked didn't warrant a legitimate response.
Any particular reason we can't have both?
well we all know Timmy can't play against defenders less than 6'9, so Blair might present a problem.
This doesn't even warrant a decent response. Whoever has some logic in his brain would know the answer.
Haha what a dumb question. Everyone knows that answer. The Big 3 have a way better basketball iq and can outplay them easily!
it would not even be close
This thread can actually take us to an interesting place. Who would be the best 3 on 3. One rule is the three players would have had to play together.
Gilmore - Moore -Gervin vs
Duncan - Parker - Ginobili or
Paultz, Kenon - Gervin or
Robinson, Duncan and Avery
That would be fun.
Ugh..I pray for your sake that you're a troll.
I dig this one.
This is clearly Hill, Blair and Splitter. Because Parker, Duncan, Ginobili all suck. With Parker, Ginobili and Duncan as your core, you would only win 15 games in a season.
Can u put ur face in my first avatar Dirk's face instead? ................what kind of question is that?
I see the blues brothers are at it again.
I'm on a mission from Allah.
The Mavericks are a respectable franchise.
This is fun.
Why cant any of you s give the person a simple answer? Isnt it easier to just say 'Duncan, Ginobili, Parker" instead of trashing the poor guy?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
