Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 166
  1. #101
    Veteran TheProfessor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    2,569
    Agree to a point. Let's not forget this roster NEEDS to get younger. You're not going to accomplish that feat by giving away draft picks. Besides adding rooks via the draft is a very cheap way to improve the talent level, without the costs associated with adding a high-priced veteran.

    Besides, the benefit of adding the best SF available @ #20, isn't with the idea of that player starting this season. It should be as a primary backup for RJ. If RJ is either traded or walks at the end of next season, then the Spurs would already have his replacement in place. Ideally, the rookie SF will be able to contribute some this season and hopefully start next year.
    I'm certain the Spurs FO hopes similarly on both counts, but that's dependent on a player dropping to 20 that the Spurs are comfortable with backing up RJ in his rookie season, and then transitioning to starter within one year in a very difficult system. We just can't know if that player is on the board until draft night. Without trading up, I have my doubts right now.

  2. #102
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    6,599
    all rookies will need time to adjust to the nba. they will have their ups and downs. any downs will immediately convince popovich to bench him in the playoffs. there is a reason why not many rookies are not allowed to play big minutes in the playoffs. the spurs should be in all in mode until duncan retires. then they can rebuild. now is not the time to think about the future.

    hill, blair, splitter, parker (if extended), and apparently ginobili (contract extension) will be enough to prevent the spurs from becoming a complete disaster after duncan retires.

    if the spurs can get a reliable veteran for the 20th, then there is no reason not to do it. of course, the value will have to equal. the spurs should not be getting some 35 year old over the hill veteran.

  3. #103
    '99/'03/'05/'07 MmP's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    1,021
    All this hype for a player we don't even know how it will turn out to be.

  4. #104
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    All this hype for a player we don't even know how it will turn out to be.
    Pretty sure no one is calling him the savior, but getting him does address a critical need to get younger, longer and more athletic in the frontcourt. It also helps that he's not your typical NBA rookie, having played against top-level compe ion in big games.

    Given his production and skill-set, there IS reason to be excited about the possibility of him in a Spurs uni next year.

  5. #105
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    all rookies will need time to adjust to the nba. they will have their ups and downs. any downs will immediately convince popovich to bench him in the playoffs. there is a reason why not many rookies are not allowed to play big minutes in the playoffs. the spurs should be in all in mode until duncan retires. then they can rebuild. now is not the time to think about the future.
    hill, blair, splitter, parker (if extended), and apparently ginobili (contract extension) will be enough to prevent the spurs from becoming a complete disaster after duncan retires.

    if the spurs can get a reliable veteran for the 20th, then there is no reason not to do it. of course, the value will have to equal. the spurs should not be getting some 35 year old over the hill veteran.
    Most rookies...not all rookies. Blair, while he had his learning curve, played like a grizzly veteran as the season wore on. In fact, he had far more productive minutes than most and was one of the few standout rookies last season. Same for Tyreke Evans, Darren Collison and a couple of other rookies.

    There is no "reliable veteran" that the Spurs can get with an offer of only their 20th pick. They will have to give up something of value in order to get value in return. In doing so, this will only create another need somewhere else at a different position. That's a short-sighted approach and not the way to go.

    Furthermore, as hard as it may be to believe, this Spurs team, as currently constructed, isn't capable of overthrowing the Fakers and winning a le next year. That window has passed. Unless we're talking LeBron James, Dwyane Wade or Chris Bosh, there is no quick fix or magical remedy that will better position the Spurs in their quest of winning a le next year.

    The Spurs have been in "all-in" mode for the past 3 seasons. For whatever reason, it hasn't worked. They are no closer to challenging the Fakers than they were in '08 - and their core has gotten older. The manner in which the Suns ran roughshod over the Spurs should have been convincing enough. They made the Spurs look old, tired and slow. The only antidote for that is acquiring younger, fresher, quicker, more athletic players to augment the skill level of this roster. Besides, unless RJ suddenly decides to opt-out, they will have very limited financial flexibility anyway.

    The Spurs would be better served filling their roster holes via the draft and possibly via low-cost free agents. If do they do that, yet still fall short of le contention, so be it. They will be better prepared going forward.

  6. #106
    Triple meat, triple cheez DJB's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    1,640
    Someone make one of those Splitter in a Spurs jersey photoshop jobs, like the knicks fans in ny do for Lebron.

  7. #107
    99/03/05/07/14 Spurs Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    27,510
    Tiago interview but no news

    http://www.elpais.com/articulo/depor...lpepudep_5/Tes

    P. Josean Querejeta, presidente del Caja Laboral, declaró que vería "normal" su salida hacia la NBA [San Antonio Spurs poseen sus derechos]...

    R. Es verdad. Todos saben cuál es mi situación, con dos años más de contrato con opción de salida. Todos estos años dije que jugar en la NBA es un sueño que tengo en mi cabeza. Espero decidirlo cuanto antes. Además, este verano me caso, tengo el Mundial de Turquía...
    'All those years I said play in the NBA is a dream and I wants to decide ASAP because there's also the Turkey Tournament'

  8. #108
    silverblk mystix
    Guest
    Tiago interview but no news

    http://www.elpais.com/articulo/depor...lpepudep_5/Tes



    'All those years I said play in the NBA is a dream and I wants to decide ASAP because there's also the Turkey Tournament'
    Question:
    Josean Querejeta,president of Caja Laboral, declared that he would view-as normal- your leaving for the NBA (San Antonio Spurs own splitters rights)

    Response;

    It is true. Everyone knows my situation, two years left on my contract with an opt out clause/option. All of these years I've said that i have a dream in my head to play in the NBA. I expect to decide as soon as possible. In addition, this summer I will get married, I have the Turkey (World) Tournament...




    ...tried to translate the essence a bit closer---hope I didn't misrepresent anything...if any experts out there---feel free to revise...

  9. #109
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    wtf does he wanna play in the turkey tourney, when he can come here sign the contract, take a rest and get married, get ready for drive for 5

  10. #110
    silverblk mystix
    Guest
    wtf does he wanna play in the turkey tourney, when he can come here sign the contract, take a rest and get married, get ready for drive for 5
    there is ALWAYS that issue with int'l players...

    sure the spurs---and the nba in general -- get some good players...

    but there is always a negative side when you are faced with injuries which could be attributed to the extra wear and tear on players...

  11. #111
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    There is no "reliable veteran" that the Spurs can get with an offer of only their 20th pick. They will have to give up something of value in order to get value in return. In doing so, this will only create another need somewhere else at a different position. That's a short-sighted approach and not the way to go.
    If Spurs don't like anyone available at 20, that pick will have value and Spurs could possibly get a quality bench player on the rookie scale salary like they did with Speedy Claxton on draft night in 2002.



    The Spurs have been in "all-in" mode for the past 3 seasons. For whatever reason, it hasn't worked.
    In 2008 Manu was playing on one leg, in 2009 Manu was out for the playoffs. Those are a few important reasons why it hasn't worked. Don't get me wrong, I understand the Lakers were the most talented team, but the Spurs didn't have their gun fully loaded so to speak to where we can fairly make the correct assessment.


    They are no closer to challenging the Fakers than they were in '08 - and their core has gotten older.
    The Boston Celtics give me some hope as Duncan is still the better player than Garnett.

    I'd give Manu the slight nod on Paul Pierce even though its close.

    And I still believe Tony is a better offensive player than Rondo, even though Rondo has a better overall floor game especially on the defensive end off the ball ( Tony is a very underrated on the ball defender.)

    Can Hill and R.J both contribute as much as Allen? I think so!

    Spurs just need Splitter to be the Spurs' Kendrick Perkins as a superior interior positional defender (which he is). That being said I'd give Splitter the nod over Perkins, because he is a more viable threat on the offensive end with his back to the basket IMO. (Then again to judge these two players is premature because Splitter has yet to play in the league, much less sign with the Spurs.)

    And don't forget just as Manu and Duncan are getting older, so is Kobe. (perhaps the oldest soon to be 32 year old in the history of the league.)


    The manner in which the Suns ran roughshod over the Spurs should have been convincing enough. They made the Spurs look old, tired and slow.
    I don't think the Spurs looked old or tired the first 42 minutes of just about playoff game. I just think Pop was wrong about the minute distribution and overplayed the top 6 guys in the rotation in the playoffs, which hurt the overall execution on both ends of the floor in the 4th quarter. (Especially Duncan and Manu's productivity during the closing minutes)

    I understand that Tim is a compe or, but the guy can't play 42 minutes a night in the playoffs (or play the whole second half) and be as effective in put up or shut up time. I'm sorry he can't and the same can be said for Ginobili, Parker and even Hill. And this has nothing to do with getting as much rest as possible during the regular season. In order for the Spurs to reach their full potential and in order for them to be able to execute as efficiently as possible in closing minutes to win games, they have to keep Duncan and Manu's minutes limited under 35 for them to be as effective and efficient as possible in the closing minutes of the 4th quarters to get wins.

    Duncan and Manu were simply gassed at the end of pretty much every game in the playoffs from the Dallas series to the Suns series and it hurt their 4th quarter execution, especially in the Suns series. And I believe the weight that transferred over to Hill's shoulders was too much for him (42-45 minutes a night guarding players bigger than him and having to score offensively). IMO

    Pop needs to trust and put more weight on the shoulders of Blair, Splitter, maybe Mahinmi and whoever sticks as the 5th wing in the regular season to give them the confidence to be able to contribute at a high level in April, May and possibly June. And if that's the case, the age factor won't be an issue because Duncan and Ginobili will have their minutes limited to the point where they can still be consistently productive in the 4th quarter of close games when it matters. (Limited as no more than 35 minutes a night)


    Besides, unless RJ suddenly decides to opt-out, they will have very limited financial flexibility anyway.
    If R.J opts out Spurs will still only have the MLE to make additions.
    Last edited by MaNu4Tres; 06-20-2010 at 10:58 AM.

  12. #112
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    337
    all rookies will need time to adjust to the nba. they will have their ups and downs. any downs will immediately convince popovich to bench him in the playoffs. there is a reason why not many rookies are not allowed to play big minutes in the playoffs. the spurs should be in all in mode until duncan retires. then they can rebuild. now is not the time to think about the future.

    hill, blair, splitter, parker (if extended), and apparently ginobili (contract extension) will be enough to prevent the spurs from becoming a complete disaster after duncan retires.

    if the spurs can get a reliable veteran for the 20th, then there is no reason not to do it. of course, the value will have to equal. the spurs should not be getting some 35 year old over the hill veteran.
    Hopefully Splitter will be more of a rookie in the Manu Ginobili mould. He is a similar age to Manu when he first came to the NBA with similar experiences in Europe, and he is a proven winner on the 2nd biggest stage. His game has also had years of refinement and good teaaching of fundamentals in Europe.

    You can't compare him with a 19 year old coming into his first professional gig.

  13. #113
    Veteran J_Paco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    3,094
    Furthermore, as hard as it may be to believe, this Spurs team, as currently constructed, isn't capable of overthrowing the Fakers and winning a le next year. That window has passed. Unless we're talking LeBron James, Dwyane Wade or Chris Bosh, there is no quick fix or magical remedy that will better position the Spurs in their quest of winning a le next year.

    The Spurs have been in "all-in" mode for the past 3 seasons. For whatever reason, it hasn't worked. They are no closer to challenging the Fakers than they were in '08 - and their core has gotten older. The manner in which the Suns ran roughshod over the Spurs should have been convincing enough. They made the Spurs look old, tired and slow.
    First off, no player will guarantee any team any sort of success or championship. A team acquiring LeBron, Dwyane or Chris won't be successful unless they augment those individual superstars (LeBron and Dwyane) or star (Bosh) with considerable talent. Unless two of those guys join forces I believe they'll have just as hard of a time to win a championship as they do now.

    Secondly, obviously the team as constructed last season wasn't going to win the championship. They just didn't have the right mixture of size, depth, talent and defensive ability to even challenge Phoenix. But, they went against a team that ran 10 players deep with consistent minutes and defined roles given to all. While, Popovich went to a short bench, sporadic minutes given to many players and many not having a defined role throughout the season and playoffs. If Pop continues that routine into next season the team is ed either way.

    Lastly, Los Angeles hasn't existed in some vacuum where Kobe, Derek, Pau, Lamar and Andrew haven't aged. They've all struggled with declining play, fatigue or injury throughout the past three seasons. I could easily see one of Fisher, Odom or Artest play falling off a cliff do to the long seasons they've endured. Kobe has already showed signs of his body and athleticism not being the same any longer. While Bynum may never reach his full potential because of his constant knee issues that have hampered and slowed his development. Plus, there is the fact that L.A. is way over the cap and won't be able to acquire high caliber talent. Their current weaknesses will only become more pronounced from here on.

    My point is that the Spurs might not get the best of Los Angeles, though I think Splitter and a quality draft pick will seriously help, but I believe that someone likely will next season. They've played 100+ games three consecutive seasons, now. They can't seriously improve their team beyond its current make-up. The lucky breaks and injuries will begin to go against their favor. The Spurs, and every other Western Conf. team, need to come out strong and hit L.A. hard from the outset and see if they truly are a historical team next season.

  14. #114
    Believe. Parker2112's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,495
    If Spurs don't like anyone available at 20, that pick will have value and Spurs could possibly get a quality bench player on the rookie scale salary like they did with Speedy Claxton on draft night in 2002.




    In 2008 Manu was playing on one leg, in 2009 Manu was out for the playoffs. Those are a few important reasons why it hasn't worked. Don't get me wrong, I understand the Lakers were the most talented team, but the Spurs didn't have their gun fully loaded so to speak to where we can fairly make the correct assessment.




    The Boston Celtics give me some hope as Duncan is still the better player than Garnett.

    I'd give Manu the slight nod on Paul Pierce even though its close.

    And I still believe Tony is a better offensive player than Rondo, even though Rondo has a better overall floor game especially on the defensive end off the ball ( Tony is a very underrated on the ball defender.)

    Can Hill and R.J both contribute as much as Allen? I think so!

    Spurs just need Splitter to be the Spurs' Kendrick Perkins as a superior interior positional defender (which he is). That being said I'd give Splitter the nod over Perkins, because he is a more viable threat on the offensive end with his back to the basket IMO. (Then again to judge these two players is premature because Splitter has yet to play in the league, much less sign with the Spurs.)

    And don't forget just as Manu and Duncan are getting older, so is Kobe. (perhaps the oldest soon to be 32 year old in the history of the league.)



    I don't think the Spurs looked old or tired the first 42 minutes of just about playoff game. I just think Pop was wrong about the minute distribution and overplayed the top 6 guys in the rotation in the playoffs, which hurt the overall execution on both ends of the floor in the 4th quarter. (Especially Duncan and Manu's productivity during the closing minutes)

    I understand that Tim is a compe or, but the guy can't play 42 minutes a night in the playoffs (or play the whole second half) and be as effective in put up or shut up time. I'm sorry he can't and the same can be said for Ginobili, Parker and even Hill. And this has nothing to do with getting as much rest as possible during the regular season. In order for the Spurs to reach their full potential and in order for them to be able to execute as efficiently as possible in closing minutes to win games, they have to keep Duncan and Manu's minutes limited under 35 for them to be as effective and efficient as possible in the closing minutes of the 4th quarters to get wins.

    Duncan and Manu were simply gassed at the end of pretty much every game in the playoffs from the Dallas series to the Suns series and it hurt their 4th quarter execution, especially in the Suns series. And I believe the weight that transferred over to Hill's shoulders was too much for him (42-45 minutes a night guarding players bigger than him and having to score offensively). IMO

    Pop needs to trust and put more weight on the shoulders of Blair, Splitter, maybe Mahinmi and whoever sticks as the 5th wing in the regular season to give them the confidence to be able to contribute at a high level in April, May and possibly June. And if that's the case, the age factor won't be an issue because Duncan and Ginobili will have their minutes limited to the point where they can still be consistently productive in the 4th quarter of close games when it matters. (Limited as no more than 35 minutes a night)




    If R.J opts out Spurs will still only have the MLE to make additions.
    So by your logic, we are a Kendrick Perkins away from challenging for a championship? You claim we are better at every position but Perkins? We dont have the clutch shooting they get from Pierce and Allen...Rondo has intangibles that Tony doesnt have, namely defense and steals...and even though I would like to say TD is better than KG right now, TD cant even jump anymore. Case in point: KG isnt getting roofed by Gasol on a regular basis.



    Think about it: Trade out Perkins for Dice on the Spurs...you're saying we are in the finals? We arent even close. We arent playing championship D at any position...yet you didnt even mention defense.

    The intangibles are why the Celts beat Orlando, Cavs, and almost the Lakers. You give us perkins and we would be lucky to win 2 against Phoenix.

    WE NEED SOME DEFENSIVE MINDED BALLERS WITH BALLS!

  15. #115
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    +1 Even with the addition of Splitter I think we are going to need another young big man. Both Dice and Duncan are going have to get limited minutes and you are going to need another big to play with Splitter. I know we have the Grizz but he is short and slow and will not get much playing time against teams like the Flakers and Suns.

    I am just wondering if we traded Hill to Indiana for getting their 10 pick would getting Sato make sense? And would we be a better team with Sato and Ed Davis/Paul George?

  16. #116
    Drive For FIVE Spurologist's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    14,750
    Someone make one of those Splitter in a Spurs jersey photoshop jobs, like the knicks fans in ny do for Lebron.

  17. #117
    Veteran milkyway21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    10,988
    Tiago Splitter

    Rank: #4
    Vitals: 6-11 245
    Position: PF/C
    NBA Comparison: Al Horford with more skills
    Status: unrestricted free agent (he has a player option on his contract) - draft rights held by the San Antonio Spurs so another team would have to trade for his rights before signing him.

    My Assessment: Splitter is a legit 6-11 big man that is known for his team defense and his efficient offense. He is experienced and consistent and he could be used as a 4 or 5 on either end of the court in the NBA. He is a very steady player and is surely a target of a lot of NBA teams. Potential NBA starting PF or starting C.

    NBA Scout Assessment: An NBA scout said this of Splitter, "Not being able to sign Splitter after the draft might have cost the Spurs a championship or two".

    http://www.talkbasket.net/blogs/top-...ects-2954.html



    if the Spurs can sign Tiago there's a chance we could stop a Laker's 3-peat hopes for next season. And I like the thought of it(just like in 2003).

  18. #118
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    My point is that the Spurs might not get the best of Los Angeles, though I think Splitter and a quality draft pick will seriously help, but I believe that someone likely will next season. They've played 100+ games three consecutive seasons, now. They can't seriously improve their team beyond its current make-up. The lucky breaks and injuries will begin to go against their favor. The Spurs, and every other Western Conf. team, need to come out strong and hit L.A. hard from the outset and see if they truly are a historical team next season.
    That's the point I was originally trying to make. The Spurs were never going to get the best of the Fakers because they didn't have the horses. They simply weren't in the same neighborhood. Their inability to combat the Fakers length has been an issue ever since they acquired Pau Gasol in '08, and was only compounded further after Andrew Bynum began to emerge. Hopefully, the addition of Splitter and the emergence of Ian, as a regular rotation player, can help offset that deficiency.

    My point other point was that based upon the Spurs needs, and with a draft that is fairly deep in SFs, there is absolutely no reason to trade away their #20 pick. They should be able to get a young, athletic player of value that could possibly contribute some this coming season, with expectations for a larger role in the 2012 season.

    Basically, the Spurs can use this offseason to try and close the gap on the Fakers. However, let's not assume that whatever offseason upgrades they make will suddenly vault them back into contention for the Western Conference. We saw how that worked out this past season.

  19. #119
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    1,894
    My point other point was that based upon the Spurs needs, and with a draft that is fairly deep in SFs, there is absolutely no reason to trade away their #20 pick. They should be able to get a young, athletic player of value that could possibly contribute some this coming season, with expectations for a larger role in the 2012 season.

    Basically, the Spurs can use this offseason to try and close the gap on the Fakers. However, let's not assume that whatever offseason upgrades they make will suddenly vault them back into contention for the Western Conference. We saw how that worked out this past season.


    I beg to differ. I dont believe the gap between the Lakers is as great as fans think. The addition of Splitter would address the length issue. With a frontcourt of Duncan, Dice, Splitter and Blair the argument could be made that our frontcourt is more talented and definitely deeper than what the Lakers currently have. Obviously Gasol is the best big man on both teams but Im not impressed with Bynum. I think he has reached his ceiling and other than one good year he had several years ago he is going to be a serviceable big man for his career. Odom has his issues and really lacks the low post skills to be considered a true big man.

    As far as the 20th pick I definitely think that the Spurs should not trade that draft pick. My only concern is that do you draft a young underclassman with lots of potentional (upside) or go with a junior or senior that is more seasoned and can contribute next year. My choice is to draft an upperclassman such as Damion Jones that can give you rebounds, defense, energy and hustle on the defensive side. Yet can shoot the outside jumper and putbacks on the offensive side of the ball.

    Most fans are asking the Spurs to draft a 3pt shooter, athletic guy but Im not so sure the need would be so great next year. The addition of Splitter is going to make the team more athletic thus causing to teams move around much more on defense (especially on the pick and roll in which Splitter is going to shine). Also, I think Jefferson's game will improve greatly with his familiarity on offense and the addition of Splitters passing ability. For a big man Tim is one of the best passers in the NBA however Splitter may become second best passer behind Manu. The Spurs are going to be fun to watch next year.

    The 2010-11 edition of the Spurs is a solid eight deep plus two more players that will give the Spurs the distinction of having the best bench in the league and one of the top four teams in the NBA.
    Last edited by LongtimeSpursFan; 06-21-2010 at 12:58 AM.

  20. #120
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    I beg to differ. I dont believe the gap between the Lakers is as great as fans think. The addition of Splitter would address the length issue. With a frontcourt of Duncan, Dice, Splitter and Blair the argument could be made that our frontcourt is more talented and definitely deeper than what the Lakers currently have. Obviously Gasol is the best big man on both teams but Im not impressed with Bynum. I think he has reached his ceiling and other than one good year he had several years ago he is going to be a serviceable big man for his career. Odom has his issues and really lacks the low post skills to be considered a true big man.
    Getting swept out the playoffs by a good Phoenix Suns team, with whom the Spurs struggled to match up with, doesn't instill any confidence that this Spurs team had any real chance of compe ing with the Fakers. Currently, I believe the gap between Spurs and Fakers is wide. How much that gap is closed is dependent upon how the Spurs fare this summer.

    Yes, Gasol IS the best big man on both teams. Bynum has been oft-injured, however he still is a commanding presence when he's in the game. Remember, he's a legit 7'1", takes up a lot of space, and is only 23 years old. If he can get on track with good health, he'll be more than serviceable for years to come. As for Odom, even though he plays SF and has PG skills, he's still 6'10", which makes him a very versatile frontline player. He's a mental midget, but his size and length causes most teams all sorts of matchup nightmares.
    As far as the 20th pick I definitely think that the Spurs should not trade that draft pick. My only concern is that do you draft a young underclassman with lots of potentional (upside) or go with a junior or senior that is more seasoned and can contribute next year. My choice is to draft an upperclassman such as Damion Jones that can give you rebounds, defense, energy and hustle on the defensive side. Yet can shoot the outside jumper and putbacks on the offensive side of the ball.
    The calling card of the Spurs front office is they prefer to draft intelligent, mature players, with demonstrated good character. That said, and all other things being equal, it would be interesting to know how the FO has ranked the SFs in this draft, regardless of classification. My guess is the Spurs probably like the triumverate of Paul George, Xavier Henry, and Luke Babbitt. They probably have all these guys on their radar. I would guess that if they are all gone by #20, I could see the Spurs taking Damion James.

    Most fans are asking the Spurs to draft a 3pt shooter, athletic guy but Im not so sure the need would be so great next year. The addition of Splitter is going to make the team more athletic thus causing to teams move around much more on defense (especially on the pick and roll in which Splitter is going to shine).
    It's fairly obvious that the Spurs are in need of perimeter shooting. To date, the RJ experiment hasn't paid the expected dividends - on either end of the court. One of the reasons RJ failed, besides him being uncomfortable in half-court offense, is he can't space the floor with 3-pt shooting. That's just not his forte. That weapon is desparately needed to open up driving lanes for TP and Manu. A suitable and sizable backup for RJ is needed - especially since none of us knows how much longer the Spurs will be willing to continue the RJ experiment. Therefore, it would be prudent to begin grooming his replacement NOW. The mid-round pick in this draft would afford the Spurs that opportunity.

    The Splitter acquisition will certainly help their pick-n-roll offense and interior defense, but I wouldn't go as far as to proclaim him as an instant infusion of athleticism along the frontline. I still believe that is where more minutes for Ian will help in that area. I've seen enough out of him to believe he can provide the additional rebounding, shotblocking, along with some additional low-post scoring and defense.

    The Splitter acquisition notwithstanding, the Spurs STILL need to get quicker and more athletic on the wings. In addition to exposing the Spurs inability to defend the pick-n-roll, the Suns also clearly exposed the Spurs overall lack of quickness on the perimeter. Remember, the Spurs have been in gradual defensive decline for the past 3 seasons, as defensive-minded players have been sacrificed for players, who could generate more offense. Time to focus on acquiring players that can help at both ends.

  21. #121
    Veteran temujin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,408
    Get real: Trade Splitter for Joey Crawford.

  22. #122
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    8,696
    Splitter does have one thing done . . . he done lost his mind!



    Splitter decides to dress up like Little Red Riding Hood for some reason

  23. #123
    silverblk mystix
    Guest
    Getting swept out the playoffs by a good Phoenix Suns team, with whom the Spurs struggled to match up with, doesn't instill any confidence that this Spurs team had any real chance of compe ing with the Fakers. Currently, I believe the gap between Spurs and Fakers is wide. How much that gap is closed is dependent upon how the Spurs fare this summer.

    Yes, Gasol IS the best big man on both teams. Bynum has been oft-injured, however he still is a commanding presence when he's in the game. Remember, he's a legit 7'1", takes up a lot of space, and is only 23 years old. If he can get on track with good health, he'll be more than serviceable for years to come. As for Odom, even though he plays SF and has PG skills, he's still 6'10", which makes him a very versatile frontline player. He's a mental midget, but his size and length causes most teams all sorts of matchup nightmares.

    The calling card of the Spurs front office is they prefer to draft intelligent, mature players, with demonstrated good character. That said, and all other things being equal, it would be interesting to know how the FO has ranked the SFs in this draft, regardless of classification. My guess is the Spurs probably like the triumverate of Paul George, Xavier Henry, and Luke Babbitt. They probably have all these guys on their radar. I would guess that if they are all gone by #20, I could see the Spurs taking Damion James.



    It's fairly obvious that the Spurs are in need of perimeter shooting. To date, the RJ experiment hasn't paid the expected dividends - on either end of the court. One of the reasons RJ failed, besides him being uncomfortable in half-court offense, is he can't space the floor with 3-pt shooting. That's just not his forte. That weapon is desparately needed to open up driving lanes for TP and Manu. A suitable and sizable backup for RJ is needed - especially since none of us knows how much longer the Spurs will be willing to continue the RJ experiment. Therefore, it would be prudent to begin grooming his replacement NOW. The mid-round pick in this draft would afford the Spurs that opportunity.

    The Splitter acquisition will certainly help their pick-n-roll offense and interior defense, but I wouldn't go as far as to proclaim him as an instant infusion of athleticism along the frontline. I still believe that is where more minutes for Ian will help in that area. I've seen enough out of him to believe he can provide the additional rebounding, shotblocking, along with some additional low-post scoring and defense.

    The Splitter acquisition notwithstanding, the Spurs STILL need to get quicker and more athletic on the wings. In addition to exposing the Spurs inability to defend the pick-n-roll, the Suns also clearly exposed the Spurs overall lack of quickness on the perimeter. Remember, the Spurs have been in gradual defensive decline for the past 3 seasons, as defensive-minded players have been sacrificed for players, who could generate more offense. Time to focus on acquiring players that can help at both ends.

    ...all interesting points...

    one thing to remember though;

    you never know WHO will be the team standing in the way at the end of the season---

    for a couple of years it was dallas---this past season the spurs got past dallas---and then phoenix is suddenly better...

    you can plan all you want and put the lakers as the team to beat---but a OKC or a portland team could end up eliminating the lakers----and/or---the spurs...

    my point is---spurs have to somehow build a team that is using the nba rules---and upcoming rules and changes---to be the team that capitalizes first and is able to dominate--UNTIL---the nba changes them again...

    remember when the spurs defense with the TWIN towers and a prime BOWEN--dominated ---and changed the league?

    then the nba changed the rules to allow a lebron or kobe or durant---to NOT get manhandled ---

    so what can the spurs do to build a team that can be dominant BEFORE the nba gets involved---and then it WON'T matter as much WHO they have to go through...

  24. #124
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    27
    Here in Spain, everybody says that he is 99,9% in Nba.
    All depends how much Spurs want him...
    Real Madrid already sign Dor Fisher...

  25. #125
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    so what can the spurs do to build a team that can be dominant BEFORE the nba gets involved---and then it WON'T matter as much WHO they have to go through...
    Do you have any idea how to answer that question? I know that I sure don't. It seems to me that anyone who did know how to answer that question could name his own price with at least two dozen NBA teams.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •