Reply With Quote
they are better at bowling then you
Huh??? Please tell me they were ing waived already....
Also, I met Trainwreck on South Flores last night....we tore some up.
they are better at bowling then you
Idk...B&B=R&R
You don't need to waive people who don't have contracts.
No, they need to be beat with bats though.
when I got on ST this morning, it was like Sequ had woken up from a 30-day nap or something...
The Spurs should still call a press conference to say they suck and there's no way they'd ever want to bring either back though.
Is there a reason why Mason isn't included in this thread?
It might be because Mason is already gone.
Mason was actually decent for this team at times, so he doesn't deserve to be lumped in with sorry ass Bonner.
The Spurs should retire Bonner's number. He should go down as one of the all-time greatest Spurs players.
Are we sure Bogans is not under contract? I thought he signed a two-year contract last year. Does anyone specifically have an answer on this?
He was on a one year deal
I'd rather not have Bogans and Mason, I'm ok with a 2.5 Mill per year 3 year on Bonner.
Bonner isn't a starter, Bonner isn't a team savior. Bonner is a 15 minutes per night 10-8 guy to stretch the floor when your center needs a breather. Thank you please use correctly in the future.
Bogans gets a lot of heat on this board, but I think he's a good situational defender against bigger guards and forwards (can use his strength and body up). I wouldn't mind having him on the team next year on another vet min deal, provided he doesn't get overplayed for lack of better options.
Anyone else can have Mason and Bonner....un-clutch shooting and bad defense are free to walk right out the door.
No just no.
I hated Bonner the most on this forum, had a name ghosted now everyone agrees. Suck it owners!
Last edited by 4>0rings; 06-22-2010 at 06:04 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
