Reply With Quote
Hmmm. He's pretty ing stupid but I'm having having a hard time believing he's "Manny" stupid.
Hmmm. He's pretty ing stupid but I'm having having a hard time believing he's "Manny" stupid.
Would you settle for John Edwards stupid?
No way he tried to that skank.
2006?
I'll wait for the indictment.
Well, I don't believe it.
Being a few years old, I'm pretty certain that since I live in Portland, I would have heard something about this if it had any merit.
I will keep an open mind to the slim possibility though.
Why is this a thread
There's a police report.
That might be a forgery.
Notice the case number... 07-9568. The 07 indicates 2007, yet the reporting date is 10/24/06. I seriously doubt the case was held over to 2007 with enough time to get 9568 attached.
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 06-23-2010 at 09:33 PM.
And, a news report from a non-Enquirer source -- even though, say what you will, the Enquirer had Edwards dead to rights.
Hmmm...
this is the hotel the police report has for the address:
Lucia hotel
It's not a bad place, but I think he would have stayed at a nicer downtown hotel.
All I see is an allegation, confirmation of an allegation, and a su ious report because of the case number. Considering the plaintiff has not cooperated, I see no merit.
Probably just another bimbo trying to extort money from someone.
Don't get me wrong. Part of me would like to see his global ass go down. I simply don't believe it.
Here's what my local paper has on it:
Prosecutor: Al Gore was focus of sex crime inquiry in Portland
some excerpts:
At the time, according to a Portland police 2007 report, the woman reported the encounter several weeks after the incident. Portland Detective Cheryl Waddell said the woman cancelled interview appointments three times, and declined police investigation, saying a civil case would be pursued.There's no evidence a civil suit had been filed.
In January 2009, the woman returned to Portland police and said she wanted to give a statement. Detective Molly Daul and a victim advocate from the sexual assault unit met with the woman. She reported that she was repeatedly subjected to unwanted sexual touching while in his presence.
She reported she still had clothes that she had worn during the encounter, but detectives never collected them as evidence "because they did not feel there was any evidentiary value to the clothing" given the description of what she said had occurred.Anyone see something fishy:In June 2010, the woman called police, asked for a copy of her statement, and asked if she could edit it. She also advised the bureau she was going to take the case to the media.
I simply don't believe the allegations. I think someones looking for a payday.2006/07: saying a civil case would be pursued.
2010: There's no evidence a civil suit had been filed.
Could be she was extorting him and the money stopped.
When a police report says the alleged victim refuses to cooperate or report an actual crime, there's good chance the case is going nowhere.
Garth Brooks has cancer?
Could be she was a mutant alien with an exoskeleton covered in human skin.
Brad doesn't love Angelina anymore.
Normally, I would agree. But, with powerful celebrities, there's a tendency to think you won't be believed and, therefore, you don't immediately report.
According the the Smoking Gun, the complainant has (a' la Lewinsky), fluids on the pair of pants she wore that night.
I don't think this is over...
Thanks man, I needed that.
Thanks man, I needed that.
she reported it and failed to cooperate.
fluid from 3 1/2 years ago that has never been turned over to the police? good luck with that.According the the Smoking Gun, the complainant has (a' la Lewinsky), fluids on the pair of pants she wore that night.
I always figured Gore had pick of the litter of 20 yr old psyco semi-hot co-ed tree-hugging activists. 55 yr old masseuse? C'mon Goracle.
Chump remembers. Yea u remember Chump
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
