There was a definite timestamps change to my end some how. I didn't come up with the hours and minutes out of thin air. I looked at them.
Do Republicans?
There was a definite timestamps change to my end some how. I didn't come up with the hours and minutes out of thin air. I looked at them.
LOL...
Anyone notice the video is now pulled?
Funny how the liberals get lots of material that shows their heroes wrong, getting stuff pulled.
Journal Communications doesn't really strikes me as a strictly liberal media mogul. Do you know anything we don't?
Wasn't WC just commenting on copyright protection tonight?
I don't know if anyone is talking about this but if you go back and watch the clip, she actually contradicts herself later on in the clip. At the first of the clip, he states that Arizona doesn't border Mexico. However, toward the end of her amazing speech, she implies that Arizona does border Mexico. I loved how that guy corrected her. Why didn't anyone laugh in the background at her?
Her followers probably couldn't get their jaws off the floor.
You're right, but I was referring to the trend. I have seen too many items that show liberal fallacies yanked soon after they were public.
I said "lost of material." I was not being singular.
Well, here's another clip of it:
Here it is from JSOnline:
County supervisor's geography gaffe gets replay nationwide
hard to make that determination without being part of the audience, but I did find this:
MEDIA BIAS EXPOSED:
NEWSPAPERS FUND LARGEST ABORTION PROVIDER
Journal/Sentinel, Inc. owns both The Milwaukee Journal and Milwaukee Sentinel [since joined as The Journal Sentinel], as well as WTMJ-TV. WTMJ-AM and WKTI-FM.
I wonder how many "followers" a county supervisor in Milwaukee has.
None of the accused are execs of the company...
And yeah, they're certainly a big media conglomerate. That personally points me towards corporatism more than anything. Like you said, hard to know without reading/listening/watching their publications.
Let's not forget that "corporatism" is not a conservative ideal. It's not the same as independent corporations. Corporatism is more like nationalizing corporations.
I probably used the wrong word then.
I intended it to mean the pursue of an ever growing corporation intended to relinquish more power. Certainly a conservative supported idea. Also certainly a democrat supported idea, since they claim to be against it, but what they say do not match what they do. For an example, see: Private health insurance mandate.
"Let's not forget that "corporatism" is not a conservative ideal. It's not the same as independent corporations. Corporatism is more like nationalizing corporations."
what a pile of brainless gobbledygook. WTF does WC think he's saying?
So they didn't yank it from YouTube to hide it.
Yes, I know you didn't mean "corportism." Had to point it out though.
One of the problems with business and corporations is the the government picks winners and losers. If just sensible regulations were made, we wouldn't have so many problems.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)