Reply With Quote
lol no. if you think that joe johnson is going to solve any of the mavs problems, then you go ahead and think that. you wouldn't be any dumber than any of the other mouthbreathers on this forum
you're so obsessed with me being from south dallas it's comical. stop popping up in every thread that i post in
lol no. if you think that joe johnson is going to solve any of the mavs problems, then you go ahead and think that. you wouldn't be any dumber than any of the other mouthbreathers on this forum
Guy, you have a twisted sense of reality.
Brah most Mavfans on this site agree with you about Beaubois for Joe Johnson, DPG and I are in the minority there.
explain exactly how joe johnson is what we need rather than just trolling mr "i bring sooo much to this board"
this ought to be great
Also, I guess it is pure brilliance to spout off "we stacked" and breakdown how cle has to trade dal lebron. No mouth breating there.
I have already broken down my opinion at length on the matter. My suggestion was not that jj was likely to come or that he would be the best available. It was simply that sg and a legit second option are two of the mavs biggest needs and jj is a great fit. I also thought it was silly to scoff at a jj deal bc Roddy was in it.
the only time i breath through my mouth is when my nose is so stopped up from smelling your all over this board, short
cuepost about me always calling you short
No but you can cue my post about your lame attempts to be funny. I will just do what you do: "omgyou are so obssesed with my height, you just follow me around
he may be a legit 2nd option but we would still have absolutely no speed or anybody to attack the rim and get easy buckets. playoff games always boil down to 2 things: getting stops, and being able to execute and get easy buckets in the halfcourt, neither of which he addresses. he's essentially the SG version of dirk because his game is also predicated on jumpshots. it just seems pretty redundant and stupid to trade for him if it means giving up roddy who at least isn't scared to take it to the hole and has great upside.
I know you normally don't breathe through your mouth; that's hard to do w a d always in it.the only time i breath through my mouth is when my nose is so stopped up from smelling your all over this board, short
cue
yep, that whole saying that every post is an attempt at humor (whether or not it is or isn't) andNo but you can cue my post about your lame attempts to be funny. I will just do what you do: "omg
Do the Lakers have that? Joe Johnson might not get a bunch of easy buckets but he does address getting stops for Dallas in the following ways:
- Jason Terry never sees the floor in crunch time again
- Caron Butler gets to be more of a defensive minded player since he would have less of a role on offense
- Joe Johnson has the length and lateral quickness to defend wings who can drive better than anyone currently on Dallas.
Last edited by Goran Dragic; 06-29-2010 at 01:12 PM.
"omg quit following me
you ignore the post where i try to talk basketball and keep posting dumb . this is why i don't talk basketball on this forum. thanks for stopping by to get owned and prove my point in the process, scrah.
yeah that kobe bryant guy has been known to attack the rim sometimes, and that gasol guy gets some easy points in the paint. are those not easy buckets, i'm not sure if i get your agenda here?
I have already explained my take. The lamest thing on the Internet is people self proclaiming ownage.
and i tried to debate with you why your take wasn't totally correct, and you ignore it and post dumb instead. point proven. you don't offer anything to this forum, just like all the rest. you might as well be gray named spur fan #1239843.
Guy, I just responded to your troll post after my jj post (which I shouldn't have). I never said my take was totally correct, is yours? Explain to me who the mavs can get that is better.
Kobe Bryant doesn't attack the rim anymore than Joe Johnson does these days, the majority of his point come in the midrange game. Yes Gasol gets easy shots but I assumed you were referring to guys who "attack the basket", and I wouldn't really describe Gasol as someone who does that.
My agenda is to point out that having an athletic, ultra quick guard who can attack the rim is overrated. I'm not trying to single you out since a lot of people disagree with me here, but against a team like LA that has two 7 footers who rotate well congesting the paint all the quickness in the world won't change the fact beaubois would have difficulty shooting over Gasol and Bynum. How effective was Rondo's penetration in the half court against LA? In a tight halfcourt playoff game with good defense being played, you're only gonna get so many high percentage shots at the rim, the only shots you end up getting are midrange shots.
no one, i'd rather just see us stand pat rather than hurt our future by giving JJ max money and trading away beaubois. we ain't a contender without JJ, we ain't a contender with him. i'm not even sure that acquiring him would bump us up even 2 spots in the seedings.
Not to mention jj is a legit ball handler which the mavs need more of. Pick and roll is important and Dirk+JJ is nice. Plus, like I said, jj is a good defender when focused.
That's just silly to act like jj does not improve the mavs over turtle head and Roddy. Mavs aren't that far off and upgrading talent at a position of need is not a bad idea.
In defense of m>s most NBA fans are judging JJ based off a few bad playoff games against a team that he was completely over matched against. No one remembers that he was the best player on a team that won 53 games this year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions