Breakout year for George Hill??

[spursfaninla]

I think they will trade Parker, no way they resign him and keep Hill long term. But if they deal Hill I think it would be for one of this years rookies or a guy picked last year. Dont think the spurs want an older asset back.

I wouldnt be shocked to see Hill in Indy, Portland, Miami or Tor.

If they trade parker, we have no starter-quality pg.

And trading hill for a rookie is unlikely to result in a player than can contribute this year enough to make up for hill's absence.

These suggestions only make sense if the spurs have given up already. And if that were the case, then they would not have extended manu.

I think the Spurs either extend parker, or they let his contract expire. Trading parker makes no sense. They will not get back a pg that is as good, and the only other starting position that we need would be an improvement at sf, which then would be redundant until we get rid of RJ.

Does not make sense.

[galvatron3000]

Run the Point and play lock down defense and he'll have a breakout year, that is if he doesn't decline in the areas he improved this pat season

[rascal]

should be the starting point guard. Trade parker

Should be the starting 2 guard, trade Manu. Hill can breakout and be a star if given the chance.


Hill and Anderson can cover the sg spot. Manu could be moved for a quality center. Splitter, new center, Duncan and McDyess- (with less minutes than last year) on the frontline.

[Obstructed_View]

Should be the starting 2 guard, trade Manu. Hill can breakout and be a star if given the chance.


Hill and Anderson can cover the sg spot. Manu could be moved for a quality center. Splitter, new center, Duncan and McDyess- (with less minutes than last year) on the frontline.

Blair's going to be more useful to the team than Splitter. Bigs don't just walk in and know the system, particularly ones with zero NBA experience. I hope he does, but history's not with him.