Oh my, you dont think I'm credible, oh what will I ever do?!?!?!
So are you the internet cop now? just curious, do I have to clear everything I hear from now on with you?
Thanks for the heads up.
I don't need sources. I can guess right 1/3 times.
Oh my, you dont think I'm credible, oh what will I ever do?!?!?!
So are you the internet cop now? just curious, do I have to clear everything I hear from now on with you?
Thanks for the heads up.
TPark getting all butthurt when called out? Shocker!![]()
You do understand why people are a little weary of info from your "sources" right? Or are you just being stubborn?
Tpark the insider
If true, I am relieved.
That was some major backlash RJ took from the internet, in such a short while. LOL
I like RJ, and hope that he now has an idea what it's going to take to win as a Spur. Defense Defense and no mercy from the 3 blind mice. The ball into the hoop helps too, but some things just can't be controled.....or can they?You know.
You called me out?
Ok. Good for you. Not butthurt at all, just curious of your point?
That you don't find me credible? again, so what?
If your gonna be leary of my sources best be leary of about 90% of the sports writers and other sources. It was widely known that Odom was gone.
Again though, whatever floats your guy's boats.
HEY!!!!
So just curious, when were you gonna produce the evidence that the USA basketball olympic team was on steroids in 2008?
Still waitin for that btw! Thanks!
Ok I think I've narrowed it down to 2.
David Robinson
Bruce Bowen.
What's my prize?
Calling me a prick and an 'internet know it all' isn't acting all butthurt? Sure, Tpark, whatever you say.
You'd actually have a point if all I were stating was my opinion on your sources. But the fact of the matter is still that your 'sources' have crapped out before (if they ever existed in the first place), and people should take any insider info you post with a healthy dose of skepticism until there's actual proof that what you're reporting is true.
I hope Pop has been working with him about spacing. It's easily correctable, but so so destructive when it's wrong. I don't mind RJ for a cheaper price tag, and if he still sucks, they can move him. Hopefully he takes the Spurs system a little more seriously this upcoming season.
incredible
For how many things you have to wait? I'm sorry for you. Simply your lack of knowledge and misinterpretation of the posts kills you.
So your sayin you don't have that info.....
They didn't crap out. The players did. Period.
That doesn't make what I said wrong, things changed after what I was told it happens, but again, I don't understand why you feel the need to act all forum superhero...
I rather let RJ go than re-signing him to a big contract. Letting RJ go will hurt Spurs next year, signing him to a 4 or 5 years contract with a salary above $8M per year will hurt Spurs for a long time. S&T is the best outcome for Spurs.
"Just because what I said was going to happen didn't, doesn't make me wrong!"
He gave a verbal commitment to Miami. He backed out on it. Was I supposed to predict that ?
I'm sayin that I already said all what was to say
Hey
![]()
Letting RJ go would kill the SPurs this year.
The SF depth is RJ and thats about it.
a 3 or 4 year deal at about 8 million a year will not hurt the Spurs for a long time...
So you didn't had that info?
So your saying you made it up, and there was no evidence the 2008 US olympic team was doping.
Got it, thanks.
This ing sucks. Jefferson's a talented player and all, but it's crystal clear he doesn't work on this team, and the Spurs needed to cut their losses. The Spurs not being able to flip this guy into someone who can stay in front of his man and maybe hit an open jumper is devastating news. James Anderson better really be something special.![]()
Uh alot of people didn't have that info.
Ask Pat Riley about Lamar Odom...
Again hot shot, waiting for that evidence of the US team's positive steroid tests.
Well, it will hurt Spurs for 3 or 4 years. That's a long time to me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)