I disagree somewhat. I understand that the first director (or two, not sure) didn't have good material to work with - the books are hardly great literature. I'm just saying that the previous director(s) took crappy material and turned it into something absolutely sh*tty, while this director took the same crappy material and turned it into something tolerable.
By OG, I'm just going to assume you mean Original Gangsta (although I suppose old guy would also be a plausible phrase).

Reply With Quote
