Reply With Quote
I'd settle for an explanation of how, specifically, and at what age he made the choice to be straight.
Please explain why you think gay men will always molest little boys.
I'd settle for an explanation of how, specifically, and at what age he made the choice to be straight.
Two men adopting a kid is nasty.
No kids should ever have to see the demasculization and immorality of men becoming dominated and acting like females, it's against the sexual reproductive rules of nature, it only shows up in nature as an aberration.
Do all gay men act like females and become dominated?
What effect do you claim that would have on a child?So it's natural.it's against the sexual reproductive rules of nature, it only shows up in nature as an aberration.
Very convincing, gtown.
I think it was back in 84 for me.... Jimmy had a nice bottom and it was tempting but in the end I decided to keep having sex with my girlfriend...
I see where you are going with that.
Hasn't progressive academia made the determination that sexuality is a choice and not a genetic aberration?
Thanks for some honesty Curious George. Tell us your thoughts on beastility. How would some dude ing a dog affect you?
if gays want to adopt they should only be allowed to adopt the opposite sex
Why don't you show us?
So how many of your policy views are decided in non rational and non logical manners?
Because all gays want to have sex with the children of their gender, right?
Unlike you, very few of my positions are irrational.
Manny, I don't deny your right to have Boutons you in the ass, I just don't think you should be able to adopt young boys to watch.
I didn't indicate that both men would act like a female, nevertheless, one would more than likely assume the female role in sex, relationship, or parenting. If you have two masculine men as a couple, thats just as bad and fits the criteria for demasculization because one of them would have to deny his manhood and recieve. The child would have to grow up in confusion.
I said nothing that would indicate sexuality is "natural" or benificial to nature. Learn to read first before you make a clown out of yourself.So it's natural.
Very convincing, gtown.
I'm asking you legit questions and you get sooooooooo defensive so fast. You yourself said the position was irrational and illogical so why do you get upset when I characterize it as such.
Anyway, do you feel policy should be made on irrational positions?
Can you show me research that shows parenting done by heterosexuals is better than parenting by sexuals?
Despite TW silly argument, what i say to that is, the real consequence to gay adoption is raising the kid in confusion and immorality.
It truly is disgusting for two men to pleasure themselves where nature has deemed it useful to pass fecal matter and toxic substances.
moreso, it is quite disturbing that men would have to submit themselves dominated to another man and give him oral sex. An ideal man is an individual unwilliling to submit and his worth is in his self worth, and is to be glorified by the females who need him spiritually, and physically.
A dude had a sex change and was in a "lezbo" relationship with another "girl" and they decided they wanted to adopt a kid. Should they still get a boy or should we all just admit the want to be parents are mentally disturbed and have no business raising what odds say would be a straight kid?
BTW CC, I probably do have some positions based on bad or incorrect information: I'm sure everyone does. Its impossible to have the correct view on nearly everything.
One thing I will hopefully never have, is a willful position that I myself can categorize as irrational and illogical. I prefer not to shut my eyes and plug my ears and act like everything I believe is right. Anytime I view something that contradicts my view I may view it with skepticism but if it makes sense and everything checks out then I adpat my views.
Its OK to be wrong and I realize that I'm wrong on a daily basis but to just acknowledge there is no basis for a belief but to hold it anyway is pretty bad. In my view, anyway.
I don't have statistical data proving that two gay guys adopting a young boy would be better/worse/equal for the child than being adopted by heterosexual parents.
I'm asking you legit questions and you get sooooooooo defensive so fast. You yourself said the position was irrational and illogical so why do you get upset when I characterize it as such.
Anyway, do you feel policy should be made on irrational positions?
Can you show me research that shows parenting done by heterosexuals is better than parenting by sexuals?
Neither do you.
Thus my statement that my position was not based on logic.
Neither is yours.
At least I have the intellectual honesty to admit it.
I'm asking you legit questions and you get sooooooooo defensive so fast. You yourself said the position was irrational and illogical so why do you get upset when I characterize it as such.
Anyway, do you feel policy should be made on irrational positions?
Can you show me research that shows parenting done by heterosexuals is better than parenting by sexuals?
Policy shouldn't, but individual rights don't have to protect only rational people.
I have nothing against gay couples trying to reach equality with hetero couples.
Children on the other hand have no say in who they are raised by, no child should be forced into a house of confusion.
sex and animals Jack.
I feel sorry for your pets
Have children raised by sexual parents been confused on a larger basis than the average teenager? I'm not going to go into immorality because morality is a personal issue that differs from person to person so wanting to have a baseline morality to pass on to people is very non libertarian of you, Gtown.
What about heterosexuals engaging in anal sex? Do they automatically lose their parental rights? I'm fairly certain the child should not be exposed to either heterosexual or sexual habits of children in any case and I'm fairly certain that the state cannot consider sexual habits (aside from pedophiles for obvious reasons) that do not directly endanger children in any case.
It truly is disgusting for two men to pleasure themselves where nature has deemed it useful to pass fecal matter and toxic substances.
Personal and religious views are not supposed to be used for policy decisions. Once again, very unlibertarian of you.moreso, it is quite disturbing that men would have to submit themselves dominated to another man and give him oral sex. An ideal man is an individual unwilliling to submit and his worth is in his self worth, and is to be glorified by the females who need him spiritually, and physically.
not all gays are pedos but all men who like boys are gay. Also I only support gay adoption because gays should never procreate. If you believe gayness is a genetic thing than you have no choice but to agree.
That's not really a gay relationship to me cause genetically the post op is still a man.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.or...full/118/1/349
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/s...riae_Brief.pdf
http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/...cacy/brief.pdf
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/c...TRY=1&SRETRY=0
http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cas...a-aff-lamb.pdf
http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/...Lit-Review.pdf
Here are some statements by organizations and groups.
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychology
http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/facts_f...gender_parents
North American Council on Adoptable Children
http://www.nacac.org/policy/positions.html#Gay
Child Welfare League of America
https://www.cwla.org/programs/culture/glbtqposition.htm
American Psychoanalytic Organization
http://www.apsa.org/About_APsaA/POSI...PARENTING.aspx
American Psychological Association
http://www.apa.org/about/governance/...parenting.aspx
American Psychiatric Association
http://www.psych.org/Departments/EDU...ts/200214.aspx
There are a ton of other studies too but linking them does no good unless you have JSTOR access.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
