Reply With Quote
He didn't have a real alibi, watch the movie.
...I'm not totally convince Jason did it either....I sure would like to know who was Jason's alibi.....he had to have had an alibi...
He didn't have a real alibi, watch the movie.
So, Jason calls OJ before or after the murders? OJ was there and he failed to call the police...that makes him an accessory
...
Failing to call the police is not real evidence of being an assessory.
Once OJ was a suspect, he is under no obligation to tell the police anything.
Knowing that something is going to happen and not calling the police will make you an accessory in most jurisdictions.
Once OJ was under arrest, he certainly had the right to remain silent. And, as we've long since established, maybe the exercise of that right helped him to obtain a not guilty verdict in the criminal trial. But if he knew that someone else committed the murders and he wanted to avoid civil liability, he also had the right to point the finger at the real murderer (who you speculate to be someone other than Mr. Simpson) and have the civil jury conclude that he didn't do it. Instead of doing that, he chose instead to take his chances that the civil jury would just conclude that he didn't do it. He doesn't get a "well, I shouldn't even be here" defense if he doesn't show that someone else did it.
That's dead wrong. OJ Simpson is not a lawyer. He is not expected to know legal minutia.
That's no excuse for the legal system to convict the wrong guy. You basicically just knee-jerk defend the government.Once OJ was under arrest, he certainly had the right to remain silent. And, as we've long since established, maybe the exercise of that right helped him to obtain a not guilty verdict in the criminal trial. But if he knew that someone else committed the murders and he wanted to avoid civil liability, he also had the right to point the finger at the real murderer (who you speculate to be someone other than Mr. Simpson) and have the civil jury conclude that he didn't do it. Instead of doing that, he chose instead to take his chances that the civil jury would just conclude that he didn't do it. He doesn't get a "well, I shouldn't even be here" defense if he doesn't show that someone else did it.
As they say, ignorance of the law is never an excuse.
He wasn't convicted of murder. A private litigant sued him and won.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
