Reply With Quote
Why do you say that?
Look, she is not a very good orator, but when she gets around to the answer, she makes sense.
God help us all...
Why do you say that?
Look, she is not a very good orator, but when she gets around to the answer, she makes sense.
Even Bill O'Reilly was like...alright we've already established that...now give me a damn answer woman...stop using your talking points...give me ideas...what do we do now...
Yes, he had to steer her to the intended question. She was avoiding it. Think about it though. Who in their right mind can form a clear plan that far ahead when what needs to be done first looks politically impossible.
Do you spend hours thinking of and consulting others over practical impossibilities? I don't know about you, but I have better things to do with my time, and I'll bet she does too.
Gotta give Bill kudos for equally putting all parties in the hot seat.
Yeah I love how he did that...but come on..this proves that she does a great job at attacking and disagreeing...but when she was asked...alright...well what would you do...she had nothing...and doesn't that echo the Republican side...always quick to disagree...say no...
I think it's refreshing to see someone who doesn't have all the answers. That, to me, is an indication they are not bull ting.
---7/20 edit---
added "not" before the word "bull ting."
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 07-20-2010 at 07:27 AM.
She's lost without her cue card holders.
And what word-for-word was that?
I just heard the whole interview, i don't hear her answer OReillys question of what is she going to do?
You may have better things to do, but thinking about politics is her job, isn't it? Either as a talking head, or a presidential candidate? Nobody's going to hold her to it if her policy stance seems untenable in 2 years, but for s sake, lady: say something substantive.
Well you know what. Nobody is perfect. I'll bet now that this has happened, she will think some on it.
We can all find problems with any candidate. For me, I want someone who can lead, ho has lead, someone who has integrity, and other good qualities. I don't expect an individual to have all the answers. I expect them to be smart enough to place people within their circles who are experts to draw upon.
I bet she still can't name the journals she reads. Why? Because she isn't interested in policy, she's interested in power and celebrity.
You don't need to apologize for her.
"Nobody is perfect."
It's NOT the perfect end of the scale where mama grizzly has located her stupid, ignorant self.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 07-12-2010 at 12:53 PM.
I saw this interview and it was painful to watch. Beyond the 'secure the borders Bill'... she was clueless as what to do about everyone else here..even she eventually acknowledged that some type of comprehensive reform was needed..after being asked 10 times.. I guess for her not knowing the answers it's refreshing for some..,yet when a democrats doesn't it's because he's lying for the same folks...
I had 1 or 2 job interviews that went like this. No, I wasn't hired.
Is Wild Cobra a mouse troll?
OMG...
You know how to hurt a person bad...
Can't get much worse than comparing me to him...
No, she doesn't.
This is her job.
ok let's play. if palin were president:
unions wouldn't be running gm
Our unemployment might be the same, but we wouldn't have wasted 600 billion
Chris Mathews would have never had a tingling feeling go up his leg.
Silly Palin...who let you out of the kitchen...
I see the left continues its obsession with Palin.
Black people who violate individual's civil rights might actually get prosecuted.
The vice president, more likely, would have had a private sector job at some point of their life.
Palin wouldn't have people who don't pay their taxes as her appointments.
You know that case was handled by the Bush administration, don't you?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
