Reply With Quote
Meaning they made the decisions on regarding criminal prosecution of that case.
Do you need a definition of "criminal prosecution" now?
define handle
Meaning they made the decisions on regarding criminal prosecution of that case.
Do you need a definition of "criminal prosecution" now?
maybe you don't understand what dropping charges, and lowering charges, is.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...968458430.html
let me guess wsj is biased, unlike the atlanta-cons utional or media matters.
Do you know what "the first week of January" means?
Do you know what "civil lawsuit" means?
Could you give me a link to the legal complaint of the voters at that polling station who said they were being intimidated, snc?
I'd love to read it.
what does that have to do with it being a bush appointee?
When none of the defendants filed any response to the complaint or appeared in federal district court in Philadelphia to answer the suit, it appeared almost certain Justice would have prevailed by default. Instead, the department in May suddenly allowed the party and two of the three defendants to walk away. Against the third defendant, Minister King Samir Shabazz, it sought only an injunction barring him from displaying a weapon within 100 feet of a Philadelphia polling place for the next three years—action that's already illegal under existing law.
There was outrage over the decision among Congressional Republicans, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division—especially after it was learned one of the defendants who walked was Jerry Jackson, a member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic Committee and a credentialed poll watcher for the Democratic Party last Election Day.
Then the Washington Times reported on July 30 that six career lawyers at Justice who had recommended continuing to pursue the case were overruled by Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli—a top administration political appointee. One of the career attorneys, Appellate Chief Diana Flynn, had urged in an internal memo that a judgment be pressed against the defendants to "prevent the paramilitary style intimidation of voters" in the future.
.
So what was the penalty they wanted?
A bigger injunction?
Wow.
So what was the penalty they wanted?
A bigger injunction?
Wow.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ase-political/The Obama administration won a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panthers didn't appear in court to fight the charges. But the administration moved to dismiss the charges in May 2009.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ase-political/The Obama administration won a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panthers didn't appear in court to fight the charges. But the administration moved to dismiss the charges in May 2009.
way to go allstar
But there is still an injunction against them.
Still waiting for that official testimony of the voters they terrorized, snc.
Where is it?
Way to go, envious non all-star.
you mean like the people she placed within her circle in Alaska?
keep waiting goalpost holder. I don't care about some idiotic notion you came up with to save face.
Do you honestly think that wasn't voter intimidation all-star?
did they pay their taxes? Did they ever charge that americans deserve to die from the terrorist attacks? Were they ever involved in a bombing of a police station?
Everything I said was true. You then moved the goalpost.
Which voters were intimidated, nonstar?Do you honestly think that wasn't voter intimidation all-star?
Show me their official testimony.
she would have waved her magic ass and made the oil spill disappear
Black people aren't being arrested anymore? News to me.
No one (politicians) is going to do because they are all pussies and don't want to hurt feelings.
It'd be easier for reps to give into amnesty if the dems hadn't successfully portrayed anyone not labeled them as bigoted evil racists. Reps are scared the dems will get 12-20 mil new votes and successfully reach a one party system. They have successfully enslaved 90% of the black vote, so there you go.
Either way both sides are first thinking about their political agenda before the country...nothing new. That's humanity for you.
To make both sides happy just:
1) completely lock down the border
2) grant amnesty to all the Mexicans illegally in the country
3) do not let in a single immigrant (illegal or legal) for the next 10 years or however long it would take for 12-20 million LEGAL immigrants to enter the U.S.
Eat the cake bishes.
Last edited by EmptyMan; 07-13-2010 at 01:51 PM.
Locking down the border could have unintended consequences for commerce.
More incentive for Obama then.
To do what fringy anarcho-libertarians tell him to.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
