Reply With Quote
I'm not the one who criticizes those who take unemployment..when I received it previously..
so if it doesn't affect you presonally the no one has to worry about their rights being violated? really?
I'm not the one who criticizes those who take unemployment..when I received it previously..
Who's the authoritarian now? You seem to judge your fellow citizen by his conformity with you, rather than his liberty to think and speak as he pleases. Telling.
I don't criticize them.
Link please.
Judging and wanting laws dictating things are entirely different things.
He has the right to slam patriotic people, and I have the right to point that out.
Come on now. All you had to do was google image that to get an answer. http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...=&oq=&gs_rfai=while we all continue to laugh at you...
When was the last time a Republican president was put up on a billboard and compared to Hitler and democrats all clapped?
I know you like to take hard stances to the right, but I would think even Glenn Beck would tell you to ease off a bit in this case.
Billboards? Dunno about that. There was that website about how George W. Bush is a monkey or something like that. Both comparing President Obama to Hitler and comparing Bush to a monkey are messed up.
Anyway, as Winehole pointed out, it's been papered over.
I hear you, WC.
is the idea of firing bullets at illegals trying to cross the border a "tea party" idea, or is it just yours?
maybe a bit of both?
Aw cmon now......I thought all you had to do was google image that to get an answer.
And I don't even know what you're talking about, not showing which quote you are responding to.
#30 @4:04pm. Your last response to me. The lag time was two minutes. It should be clear contextually.
.
I think it's the idea of enjoying the act of firing bullets at illegals crossing the border that is a Tea Party staple. Lot's of misplaced rage in that movement.
That idea came about long before the Tea Party. It's called forceful border control. You make it sound bad not specifying that aspect.
OK, it does make sense. I figured it was that one, but I like to keep most assumptions down to a minimum. I don't like getting bit by them.
ASSume all you want. You don't understand how some of us really believe we need to control the border.
Apparently you didn't even do that? Is it a great victory that the specific dimensions of your challenge were not met (no billboards)?
The TEA Party has a more civil solution too though, they want an underground electrified fence to zap the Mexicans.
EDIT: Which is more civil that shooting them.
Last edited by DMX7; 07-14-2010 at 04:39 PM.
If your profile could only show bite marks, it'd be a ragged corpse, man.
So you say.
You seem to assume a lot of people are idiots or worse for failing to see things your way.
You can call it whatever you want and I can still make it sound bad because it is.
Are there many public billboards put up by groups that depict Bush as Hitler? I wasn't aware.
You love to play it both ways WC. Conservatives do something tasteless, and you call libs "babies". Liberals do something tasteless, and it's an example of the "harassment" that you quoted up there.
So next time a liberal does something tasteless, should we brush it off as conservatives being babies?
No I didn't even do that.
I was fully ready to concede that there have possibly been billboards out there that have bashed Republican presidents..........however......
it appears a great E-victory might actually be within my grasp....I may take my white flag down......
Probably. But because it's all secret, we'll never really know, will we?
Probably a setup by lib s to give the Tea Party a bad name...
I think you guys are overestimating what it takes to put up a billboard like this. All you have to be is the usual irrational protester, but with a little more money to waste.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
