Repugs are getting their campaign wish, voters will be in pain for a long time.
US Fed says economic outlook worse than expected
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0714/fed...orse-expected/
In reality, it may come to that at some point in time. However, I am 100% against any discussions of amnesty, until we can control immigration. Otherwise, it causes a flood, of people wanting to get in before the cut-off.
Repugs are getting their campaign wish, voters will be in pain for a long time.
US Fed says economic outlook worse than expected
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0714/fed...orse-expected/
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServe...suecentersf134
the cost of illegal immigration is about 10% of the cost of the wars we are currently conducting. your complaining about the bleeding from your big toe and your leg just got lopped off?
your a ing genius, WC. I am stupid.
typical repub bs. blame your problem on "outsiders." just like hitler.
Price differences are subject to interpretation, and wars are authorized in the cons ution, as is immigration control. Socialist programs aren't.
authorized in the cons ution doesnt = good for our country. try again.
What do you do if good for our country is a violation of the cons ution?
good for our country is COMPLETELY AUTHORIZED ONCE IT BECOMES THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
that fact never comes out of your mouth it seems.
Only if a cons utional change is made.
regulation/stimulus/influence on markets that influence our economy are not uncons utional regardless what glenn beck may have told you.
people can vote elected officials in on platforms that favor a shift in our economy. whether you respect the will of the voters or not.
Wait one ing minute asshole.
I asked "What do you do if good for our country is a violation of the cons ution?," got an answer, and now you act as if that wasn't the question.
Again...
What do you do if good for our country is a violation of the cons ution?
And just what are you implying would be a violation of the cons ution, weasel?
I was asking a hypothetical.
Does your need to do what is right still apply when it violates the cons ution?
absofugginlootly not.
Good.
You have limits to your authoritarian ideas.
its not authoritarian if it is the will of the voters. but I will grant you the will of the voters must take a back seat to the framework of our democracy and our cons ution
But the things you talk about are not the will of the voters. Look at all the resistance.
Hm... perhaps I will make myself more clear.
Fine with me. I'm all for better border control; I just don't agree with some of the bloodlust that others who share that opinion seem to have.
my bad. you called it.
Allow indefinite detention of prisoners without charging them with any crime?![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)