Reply With Quote
answer the question WC.
you want hands off corps and hands all over citizens rights?
You are so wrong. Having a strong military and wanting a military state ate not the same.
answer the question WC.
you want hands off corps and hands all over citizens rights?
Wow...
How many times must you have missed the idea I believe some regulations are necessary.
miitary state is a domestic concept. The CC is advocating doesnt have a damn thing to do with the military abroad. it has everything to do with citizens rights here at home, AND THAT CONS UTION YOU CLAIM TO LOVE SO MUCH.
@ you getting your panties in a wad. Are you REALLY Mouse?
Nope. I'm not for a military state. A terrorist is a ing terrorist. They shouldn't get Geneva Convention rights. I'm serious as cancer. Get the information you want out of them and then shoot them like a rabid dog.
As for the wiretapping, I'm for it as long as it is in the interest of National Security. Like I said, I've got nothing to hide and no other law abiding citizen does either. We didn't pick this war but Radical Islam has declared war on US. We need to use every means possible to protect ourselves.
REGULATIONS? How bout infringement of cons utional rights? And your OK with that all of a sudden WITHOUT A CONST AMENDMENT?
you dont know who is a ing terrorist till the gets tried. in a US COURT OF LAW. WITH CONST PROTECTIONS AFFORDED. If you dont want them, move to Iran, you ignorant repug.
Nope. I'm not for a military state. A terrorist is a ing terrorist. They shouldn't get Geneva Convention rights. I'm serious as cancer. Get the information you want out of them and then shoot them like a rabid dog.
As for the wiretapping, I'm for it as long as it is in the interest of National Security. Like I said, I've got nothing to hide and no other law abiding citizen does either. We didn't pick this war but Radical Islam has declared war on US. We need to use every means possible to protect ourselves.
He is just a slightly more understandable version of mouse, isn't he?
protect ourselves from who? if you have no warrant, no probable cause, you dont have any reason to require protection. what a simple repug
Nope. I'm not for a military state. A terrorist is a ing terrorist. They shouldn't get Geneva Convention rights. I'm serious as cancer. Get the information you want out of them and then shoot them like a rabid dog.
As for the wiretapping, I'm for it as long as it is in the interest of National Security. Like I said, I've got nothing to hide and no other law abiding citizen does either. We didn't pick this war but Radical Islam has declared war on US. We need to use every means possible to protect ourselves.
WC, you are a straight hypocrite.
I must have missed that posting. Which one is it please. I have never taken any of his posts to mean that, unless you consider any law enforcement like the military.
Huh?
I'm only comparing you to another poster.
Have you read anything that mouse posts by chance?
You two probably agree allot.
If I'm a "simple Repug" what label do you give yourself?
Sure I know what a terrorist is. A lot of those guys in Guantanamo were captured on the field of battle shooting at our guys. They don't need a ing trial.
your talking about people here at home, gunnie...its not so cut and dried.
battlfield logic doesnt work when someone can be rounded up, interrogated, "taken out back and shot" based on someone's false charges.
do you understand that the cons ution is meant to keep the gov from directing false charges, such as "terrorist," against its dissenters like they did in jolly old england?
you dont even know what the your fighting for. wake the up CC.
#65...
Another failed post.
how can you two expect any cred, when you both selectively thump on the cons ution like you do?
dude, you have already shown me you dont know about the cons ution, and whats more you only support it when its supports you.
Instead of blaming Obama, blame people who would kill our const rights...people like yourself.
So can we shoot the guantanamo terrorists?
BTW, I've been "no knock" raided by the ATF on a gun charge (long story) and STILL support their right to do it.
when do you need to tap guantanamo prisoners phones? you were talking about the rights of US citizens, not detained terrorists. you were taking about kicking in the doors of detainees? I dont ing think so.
you cant even tell the difference between the two?
then your a sheep. and a commie, who would turn all your rights over to the government. and the cons ution says your ing wrong.
you cant support your gov's right to violate the cons ution...it doesnt work like that gunnie.
Where did I specify US Citizens? I was talking about the detained terrorists in Guantanamo.
Make up your mind. I thought I was a "Simple Repug".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions