lol Italy
33. Algeria LMAO
7. England...? If England is gonna be ranked that high USA should be higher
11. Italy....well deserved after a poor injury ridden performance, but everyone knows they will be back in contention for their spot....they always do
http://www.mapsofworld.com/2006-fifa...-rankings.html
i think you dont know what youre talking about. they had a good little squad and 10th was well deserved: nedved in great health, cech in amazing form, rosicky as a younger faster player, jankulovski, grygera.
nedved was the main playmaker for Juventus back when they had Ibra and were winning all those les. granted they got caught for cheating but so did the NBA refs and stern knew about it, but had to cover it up so the NBA wouldnt fold and Donaghy took the hit
Look at your site again...they were ranked 2nd going INTO the WC. I remember there was big hype about Ghana beating the "2nd ranked team in the world" during the WC.
I am about to buy the Ghana WC shirtbad ass jersey
LOL Italy
US > France > Italy
USA >> Italy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> France
lmao rob green > Buffon.
Can't wait till 2014!
The dude's also wrong on the entire fact of calling what the settlers did in American colonial times "quitting".... it's the opposite really, they came to a new territory to seek a better life for them and their families. And those that did that had a lot of balls in doing so. Exactly what about that is quitting?
If we apply his logic to another people, African-American slaves, then we could say slaves quit as well, those that left their plantations for the North. They sought a better life, but they quit according to whomever the dumbass is who applied it like this for colonial people in the 1600-1800s.
Last edited by ALVAREZ6; 07-16-2010 at 11:58 PM.
Slovenia 19th. Great for a country of 2 million people.
Australia > France
Australia > Mexico
Australia > Ghana
![]()
Those rankings were post-WC. They were ranked 2nd pre-WC. A WC in which they failed to get out of the group stage btw...despite having those big name players you named. FIFA Rankings have always been .
Im Mex-Ame tbh.
That's the spirit
Co-Sign
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Football_Elo_Ratings
Exactly like it should be: Mexico > USA
Now that's more realistic, although I would put USA a few spots higher than that.
2-4 are pretty much interchangeable I would guess...Brazil, the Dutch, and Germans are all capable of being the 2nd-4th best teams in the world imo.
Fifa is now synonymous with up.
LMAO ITALY
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)