Reply With Quote
Nah, it's not irrelevant, because many Americans disapprove. Just because the signs are made doesn't mean people have to approve of them, like them, stand behind the act that paid for them, or anything else.
Eh, you're free to make assumptions, however wrong they may be.Again, your argument betrays your view of politics as a big spectator sport. It's not a "Congrats Los Angeles Lakers" billboard in San Antonio. It's a notice of a public project that is happening whether Republicans voted for it or not.
You present the idea that passers-by would look up more information on the act as though it were a bad thing. If they choose to vote one way or another based on their understanding of the terms of the stimulus, that's their choice.where have I even implied anything such as the bolded. Please, come with something tangible, friend.
My argument is hinging on the fact it's a politicization through reasoning, NOT any personal beliefs or allegiances. I've made no mention of any negative aspects or connotations of people researching into it; I've consistently made it clear I have no problem with the message. Why do you assume things and jump to conclusions without any reasoning?
Agreed; I think this will cause many people to google the act, which will bring knowledge about the two party's arguments concerning it.If they learned something about it that they didn't know, great. But in today's media environment they're just as likely to Google an article blasting the Democrats for the Stimulus as they are to find one praising them.
Since it (obviously passed), one presumes many people will find the Democrat's arguments more convincing, as well. That's JMO, though.
