Yes, because there were no major military operations in Iraq after the Mission Accomplished debacle.
Not one.
Yes, because there were no major military operations in Iraq after the Mission Accomplished debacle.
Not one.
I don't recall all the details that far back.
Isn't returning to home port good enough for that carrier's current mission being over, i.e. accomplished?
Are you saying that banners are never put on ships returning home, when the crews families are waiting for them? That this is unusual?
One of the first, if not the first, navel vessel returning to home port after a wartime deployment.
Isn't that enough of an accomplishment for you?
If your standards are higher, then OK. I'll live with that.
they had the longest deployment at the time of 18 months. Bill sammons, yes he's a bush guy, said the banner was about the military. I believe that.
ARe you stating that all major combat operations were over in Iraq? Or maybe you mean all the current major combat operations were over, but that Bush planned on starting a whole bunch of new ones the next day, and he was just happy that these specific operations were over?![]()
the banner was about a staged event.........that burned taxpayer money.
It was an elitist banner.
the banner should have said "have you seen my daughters today?"
I would argue that the significance of an event that is only about a ship coming home (important yes) and the significance attached to it (giant banner seen on live TV, national address from the President) don't quite match up.
However, if the event was actually talking about the end of all major combat ops, then the address by Bush would have been fitting.
Banners are probably hung on ships returning home, but their return isn't greeted by live TV and a speech by the President.
Shock and Awe was over. The constant pounding was over. we had already secured a large area. Sure, there were still large scale operations, but not like before his speech.
So it was not the end of major military operations in Iraq.
OK.
To the public at large, (and most of the military) there is not a big difference between "large scale" and "major combat operations" is there? Would you argue that since that day, what we've done in Iraq doesn't cons ute "major combat operations"?
yeah, but at the time, bush didn't know that.
So is it your contention, that under such cir stances, banners should be removed?
I believe so, but I don't have the relevant facts.
I would say major combat operations were done, because we then split the different units into many less coordinated large scale operations, rather than one focused operation.
I don't see anything wrong with the banner, assuming that all major combat operations were ended.
Do you think all major combat operations were ended?
Well, we are on different wavelengths. You are acting as if the carrier should be 100% tied to the presidents speech. I disagree with that.
Do you think the makers of the banner knew the words in the president's speech before putting up the banner?
Asked and answered.
im ok with spending money to celebrate veterans coming home.
yeah, it would have been great if it were about veterans coming home.
Wouldn't you say it's misleading to argue that "major combat operations" are finished, if the tempo of operations remains the same but is split into various other operations?
If the banner was only about the mission of the carrier, isn't it somewhat short-sighted of the President's team to not assume that a banner which read "Mission Accomplished" might not be associated with the speech the President was making in which he was discussing the end of all major combat operations?
Do you think that Presidential team might not have thought that a giant "Mission Accomplished" banner might not be associated with the President's speech in which he was talking about a specific mission being accomplished?
So you think that all major combat operations were completed, and replaced with "large scale" combat operations.
In the same sense, I could say that I could tell my boss that I "finished" the major pieces of a project, even if I still had years to go before I was done with it, because I'd only have some "large scale" pieces left to finish.![]()
This is pointless. we are going in circles.
I'll give you a bone though. The WH did know that specific banner would be there. Did you know that?
I know, makes your argument better. However, I say they are still separate issues, and for the left to make it a bis issue is real silly I think.
it's silly to pretend they weren't connected.
I assumed the White House knew... it's kinda hard to miss, after all.And it's not like they couldn't have asked the crew to take it down temporarily. It shows poor planning on their part, to think that the two messages (Missions Accomplished + all major combat ops ended) wouldn't be seen as one message by the viewing audience.
Yeah. They made the banner. So it's not a stretch to think they knew it would be there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)