Reply With Quote
I will note here that I think censoring Fox is bs. Let the free market work. If people want biased stories, let them have them.
To be honest, I didn't see any news anchors listed, just journalists. Could you point them out?Which fox news anchors are wanting to censor a whole news outfit?
Which fox news anchors are praying for the death of _______ archetypical liberal?
Thanx for agreeing that there is a liberal bias.
Also, you should probably look up some of the stuff Ann Coulter has said. I'm pretty sure it was on Fox, but I might be wrong.
I will note here that I think censoring Fox is bs. Let the free market work. If people want biased stories, let them have them.
So, Palin's priest is a witch-doctor....but you didn't see that on FAUX News...
We know why Yonivore afraid of black people.
So self-loathing it is.
You should read your own posts sometime.
Yes, but hardly anyone blames him for the bs his outlet released to the world, least of all you.Everyone knows that the video was posted on the web by Breitbart.
Last edited by Winehole23; 07-22-2010 at 04:20 AM.
Well, i hope jornolist has proven that it's not only FNC that is ridiculously biased.
Why are you afraid of black people?
that doesn't matter, you mentioned a cable news network, while we're talking about a print press.
And btw, Ann Coulter is not a fox journalist nor does she write hardnews. She's a political commentary pundit. That's not near the same.
It seems like you're trying to whitewash this whole thing.
In reality a liberal Listserv failed to quash the emerging story about Mr. Wright, though they talked about it. Big deal.
this conversation right now more or less stands as proof the ties between Mr. Wright and BHO, have been anything but covered up.
weak. You trying to find a faux silver lining through all this is more or less a symptom of your denial. This was bad. Many columnist and journalist, aswell as academics participated in this. The fact that they wanted to narrate a whole news cycle to their agenda should waken you up and dispell the notion that news is organic and there is no agenda.
All this proved is that liberal bias does indeed exist, that it is active, and that it is not always succesful.
The reason it wasn't succesful is because the Rev Wright debacle was during a Democrat Primary, you had Hilary sympathizers wanting to take down Obama. They mentioned Charles Gibson, and George Stephonopolous (former Clintonite) as being the ones perpetrating the smear. This was a blue on blue war.
The fact that most of the board liberals here minus Lngrrr are whitewashing this, is proof that board Liberals here are dishonest, decietful, and cheer at the notion of Government censorship.
whitewashing what? The story is being reported on now... If these handful of people did what they did then shame on them but I'm not going to indict the entire media complex like you sissies whine about..
if you dummies want to watch a new channel that shares the bias that you do then so be it..no need to take Fox off of the air..
Isn't it obvious?
This Wright business proves they are out to get us!
All those millions of fraudulent ACORN votes too!
That guy with a baton who beat dozens of white voters too!
That woman who kills white farmers too!
No, that's stupid.
If black people start citing weak or strong cases of discrimination against them, that doesn't give me the intellectual right to psychologically evaluate them.
Also, you're generalizing, and unless you're proving Yoni generalizes all these things on an entire race, it's bull .
whitewash?
This TRIVIAL connection, like "terrorist fist bumping", was amplified,hashed over, faux-outraged, etc, etc, during the campaign.
With Jerrod stuff, and Breitbart slinging his fake the day before MN signed the financial reform, just more Repug/conservative dirty tricks, which is their overwhelming specialty.
Whitewash? GMAFB
Double post.
Last edited by Winehole23; 07-22-2010 at 01:43 PM.
...what silver lining? That the evil cabal of liberal journos were helpless to prevent the outbreak of Rev. Wright stories? If as you say, HRC threw it up on the wall to discredit Obama, it's a straight up blue team fragging. Liberal journos would have been helpless to prevent the outbreak of the meme after Hilary introduced it into her campaign, right?
The intentions were bad. The execution was lacking. They didn't do . How that expresses denial on my part I'm at a loss to say. It's more like a description, really. The chatter in the clubhouse can be off-color, at times.
I never said that. Who did?
I never denied that, but there are other biases too.
Thanks for kicking your own ass, again. I consider it a public service.
Last edited by Winehole23; 07-22-2010 at 01:45 PM.
It's the truth!
You know it!
That's why you care so much about Wright!
He's out to get all of us and so is Obama because he went to his church!
You aren't black so he's going to get you too!
can you give me links on which major non conservative publications or news orgs are reporting this as more than just a sidebar?
You're an idiot if you can't percieve anything else outside of that. I thought Wright's sermons were important because it served as an ideological footprint that could have gave us a clue to Obama's beliefs, which is social justice marxism and contempt for America's current values.
I never for a second thought Obama was gonna come for me personally. Just that he was going to run an injust buearocracy predicated on the notion that justice will turn a blind eye on one group over another. And that he was going to promote egalitarian spread the wealth bull , which he has vindicated our notion of with his own words.
Exactly!
They're out to get us!
So he's coming for you personally!I never for a second thought Obama was gonna come for me personally. Just that he was going to run an injust buearocracy predicated on the notion that justice will turn a blind eye on one group over another. And that he was going to promote egalitarian spread the wealth bull , which he has vindicated our notion of with his own words.
You're an idiot who can't even perceive his own perceptions.
You're an idiot who tries to pshycoanalyze people's motives and never brings a legit argument.
You're making the illogical conclusion that since we disagree with Obama's policies or ideology that means Obama= black people, and his policies are the collective will of every single african american to go after non blacks. Those are your words, and no one is making those claims.
Only an idiot believes there is only one motive behind every act or belief.
Your argument: blacks are out to get us.
Judging from the whole of your collective pee-pants postings about blacks, these are precisely your claims.You're making the illogical conclusion that since we disagree with Obama's policies or ideology that means Obama= black people, and his policies are the collective will of every single african american to go after non blacks. Those are your words, and no one is making those claims.
Only an idiot would fail to see the pattern.Only an idiot believes there is only one motive behind every act or belief.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions