Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 46
  1. #1
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    By Art Garcia: NBA.com

    Sustainability isn't just a catch word among the environmental set. It's a purpose the league's most successful franchises subscribe to. Those who eschew prolonged stretches of mediocrity and just win.

    For them the lottery isn't a reward. It's failure.

    The Lakers and Celtics have won for the vast majority of the league's existence. The Jazz and Blazers enjoyed playoff runs lasting decades -- yes, decades -- and quickly rebounded after recent falls from grace. The Mavericks have emerged a postseason staple in the new millennium. The Suns have been relevant going on 30-plus years.

    And then there are the Spurs.

    The modern-day model of consistency, this no-nonsense outfit from deep in the heart of Texas stumbled upon a formula that sounds as simple as it is intuitive. Find good players. Develop those players. Try not to screw up. Keep your stars happy.

    "The challenge in staying compe ive is not making mistakes," Gregg Popovich said, "is finding guys that fit the system."

    Popovich has 20 years invested in San Antonio's system, the last 14 as head coach. The Spurs have captured four championships in that span -- only the Lakers (five) have more -- and own the league's longest active playoff streak at 13.

    There's also evidence, albeit slight, that slippage is occurring. In each of the last four seasons, the Spurs have won fewer games than the season before. That's actually the longest such stretch in the franchise's 43-year history. While such a stat should be taken with a grain of salt, considering San Antonio has won a le during that span, a drop from 63 wins in 2005-06 to 50 last season can't be ignored.

    So while it's foolish to suggest the Spurs are rebuilding, especially with the nucleus of the last three championship teams still intact, they are in process of replenishing around Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker. This is an organization focused on maximizing the present while remaining cognizant of the future.

    "We've used Utah as our example to try to make sure we do things in a way that's consistent and can maintain a certain level of play and a certain level of character," Popovich said. "They're the best at it."

    Duncan has been the one hardwood constant during San Antonio's postseason run, and Popovich has always been the first to point out the Spurs' good fortune in building on such a foundation. But even the most transcendent of players don't win alone, as LeBron James reminded us again a couple of weeks back.

    Flanked for Ginobili and Parker for the last three les, the cast around Duncan continues to evolve. It's a continual task for Popovich and general manager R.C. Buford to churn out willing and able complementary pieces, all in hopes of keeping that championship window ajar.

    It's a delicate balance act for a franchise lacking South Beach sizzle and bound by the strictest budget parameters of any le-winning team during the luxury tax era. Despite those inherent challenges and traditionally drafting in the crapshoot that's the bottom of the first round and lower, the front office almost feels like it can't miss on incoming rookies, free agents and trades.

    "If you get guys and find out this guy doesn't work and that guy doesn't work, then all of the sudden you've wasted money and you've wasted corporate knowledge and the best player's time," Popovich said. "Great players only have so much time in the league, and it goes more quickly than any of us think.

    "It's a matter of really making sure you bring in guys that have both the character and the ability to accept a role that you plan for them. If you're just thinking that because someone is talented it's going to work, it usually doesn't."

    That's been the thinking behind the veteran signings of Robert Horry, Brent Barry and Antonio McDyess over the years. Even the trade for Richard Jefferson last summer, which was panned throughout the season, was made for the right reasons. Popovich and Duncan had experience with RJ, who by all accounts was a model teammate and tried to fit in.

    "When you're trying to manage money and make sure that you respect the franchise players on your team, it's a big responsibility to make sure we do our homework," Popovich said. "R.C.'s group starts that and runs that very, very well and then we all get together and try to make sure which ones will fit those roles and be part of that team. So far we've been fairly successful at it."

    When it comes to cheap and vibrant talent, the last four drafts have been critical in San Antonio's quest to keep piling up victories and postseason shares. Starting in 2007, the Spurs have selected Tiago Splitter, George Hill, DeJuan Blair and James Anderson. That's a base of youth and athleticism for a team stuck with the stigma of old and slow since the last le in 2007.

    Hill has Rondo-like upside, leading to rampant speculation this summer that Parker was on the block. Blair proved to valuable rotation piece along the frontline as rookie last season. Tiago finally brings his reputation as Europe's best over this season to take over at center. Anderson ideally provides swingman depth behind Ginobili and Jefferson.

    At some point Duncan, 34, is going to hang it up. Ginobili, 33, isn't far behind. Parker is the baby of the group at 28, but, let's be honest, he's the best bet to finish his career outside of the Alamo City. Once the Three Amigos are gone, the Spurs as we know them will be, too.

    But Popovich expects the Spurs to carry on past Duncan and Co. Just as the Lakers, Celtics and those other franchises that find a way.

    "We want to bridge that gap," Popovich said. "A lot of teams have gone right into the toilet for five, eight, 10 years before they get back up. I don't think we're going to do that. Whether you're a championship-caliber team is another question, because as we look at championship-caliber teams, every one of them has got a player who's a franchise player. Not a max player."

    Popovich expounds.

    "There's a difference between a max player and a franchise player," he continued. "There aren't too many franchise players and a whole lot of max players. That's the deal. You can count the franchise players on one hand. Until you get one of those, it's not going to happen for you."

    Time will tell if and when the Spurs fine another. Until then, they keep sustaining.

    http://www.nba.com/2010/news/feature...s=iref:nbahpt1

  2. #2
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    hmm good read.

  3. #3
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    83
    I think Tony will leave SA after Tim duncan retires bc he knows the value of a great big man is to a PG, he stated that many times over his career. So he will probably look for one.

  4. #4
    Veteran Sean Cagney's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    13,402
    Pop talking about the future here? I swear he said the second Tim hangs them up he is right behind? Was he joking? Did he say that or was I just thinking of something else?

  5. #5
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    Props, ace3g.

    I see you.

  6. #6
    Veteran Libri's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,209
    "We want to bridge that gap," Popovich said. "A lot of teams have gone right into the toilet for five, eight, 10 years before they get back up. I don't think we're going to do that. Whether you're a championship-caliber team is another question, because as we look at championship-caliber teams, every one of them has got a player who's a franchise player. Not a max player."
    I also don't expect the Spurs to go down the toilet. Even during the so called dark age of Spurs history of the late eighties, the Spurs only missed the playoffs twice.

  7. #7
    He's heating up DespЏrado's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    1,176
    Pop talking about the future here? I swear he said the second Tim hangs them up he is right behind? Was he joking? Did he say that or was I just thinking of something else?
    Pop has always said it with tongue planted firmly in cheek. IE- his career is over if he doesn't have Duncan. It has never been more than pure speculation as to how much he actually means it. I'm not sure even he knows when he will retire, I'm sure some part of him likes the idea of hanging it up with Duncan, but he could always rebuild, it's a challenge that would cement his legacy.

    Personally I'd like it if he ran for governor. He's got the fiscal responsibility down, but he'd never do it.

  8. #8
    #21 timtonymanu's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    34,835
    I also don't expect the Spurs to go down the toilet. Even during the so called dark age of Spurs history of the late eighties, the Spurs only missed the playoffs twice.
    +1. The Spurs wont be a championship contender but for sure they can make some noise. A lineup of Splitter, Blair, Anderson, Hill, and a veteran Parker looks very promising for the future.

  9. #9
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    417
    So as Pop says you can only win a ring with a franchise player, we don't have one now. So the question is how can we get a frachise player ?. Unless we have Robinson injury like 1996 season, we're certainly not doing it through the draft. That leaves us with trades or Free agency. With trades you have to give to get, so the only way to get a frachice player is find a disgrunted player like Paul and trade half your team away. Spurs simply don't do that. FA ? Will the Spurs ever have enough cap space to sign a player to the max and even if they did have cap. why would an LBJ come to SA over vibrant Miami. ... hmm ? It might take another 20 years before we start seeing rings again, makes you appreiciate how lucky we were with the 4.


    Whether you're a championship-caliber team is another question, because as we look at championship-caliber teams, every one of them has got a player who's a franchise player. Not a max player."

    Popovich expounds.

    "There's a difference between a max player and a franchise player," he continued. "There aren't too many franchise players and a whole lot of max players. That's the deal. You can count the franchise players on one hand. Until you get one of those, it's not going to happen for you."

    Time will tell if and when the Spurs fine another. Until then, they keep sustaining.

    [/QUOTE]

  10. #10
    TD since 97 ezau's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,232
    Pop has always said it with tongue planted firmly in cheek. IE- his career is over if he doesn't have Duncan. It has never been more than pure speculation as to how much he actually means it. I'm not sure even he knows when he will retire, I'm sure some part of him likes the idea of hanging it up with Duncan, but he could always rebuild, it's a challenge that would cement his legacy.

    Personally I'd like it if he ran for governor. He's got the fiscal responsibility down, but he'd never do it.
    The moment Pop retires, NBA teams are gonna call him days begging him to come out of retirement.

  11. #11
    Gettin' Old ffadicted's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Post Count
    8,290
    "There's a difference between a max player and a franchise player," he continued. "There aren't too many franchise players and a whole lot of max players. That's the deal. You can count the franchise players on one hand. Until you get one of those, it's not going to happen for you."
    Story of the summer.
    Great read

  12. #12
    unity in diversity
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    2,129
    Pop might actually be talking about TP. Parker wants the MAX, and some team will probably give it to him.

    But he is simply not a franchise player. And Pop is here saying he does not think you pay the max unless they are a franchise player. Therefore, TP will never get what he wants from the Spurs.

    Perhaps the Spurs also recognize that TP does not want to use his last few prime years on a non-contending team? The Spurs window, if open still, will be closed after this year.

  13. #13
    silverblk mystix
    Guest
    parker haters reading with parker hate glasses...amazing how those hater glasses will actually twist words to fit your existing hate...

  14. #14
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    One could also argue that the market dictates that you must pay a guy max money even if you don't think he's a franchise player. That could bode well for retaining Parker.

  15. #15
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,938
    Story of the summer.
    Great read
    By Art Garcia: NBA.com
    "There's a difference between a max player and a franchise player," he continued. "There aren't too many franchise players and a whole lot of max players. That's the deal. You can count the franchise players on one hand. Until you get one of those, it's not going to happen for you."
    Detroit didn't have a franchise player when they beat the Lakers in 2006.

  16. #16
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,938
    detroit didn't have a franchise player when they beat the lakers in 2006.
    2004

  17. #17
    Believe. Leonard Curse's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    857
    So as Pop says you can only win a ring with a franchise player, we don't have one now. So the question is how can we get a frachise player ?. Unless we have Robinson injury like 1996 season, we're certainly not doing it through the draft. That leaves us with trades or Free agency. With trades you have to give to get, so the only way to get a frachice player is find a disgrunted player like Paul and trade half your team away. Spurs simply don't do that. FA ? Will the Spurs ever have enough cap space to sign a player to the max and even if they did have cap. why would an LBJ come to SA over vibrant Miami. ... hmm ? It might take another 20 years before we start seeing rings again, makes you appreiciate how lucky we were with the 4.


    Whether you're a championship-caliber team is another question, because as we look at championship-caliber teams, every one of them has got a player who's a franchise player. Not a max player."

    Popovich expounds.

    "There's a difference between a max player and a franchise player," he continued. "There aren't too many franchise players and a whole lot of max players. That's the deal. You can count the franchise players on one hand. Until you get one of those, it's not going to happen for you."

    Time will tell if and when the Spurs fine another. Until then, they keep sustaining.
    [/QUOTE]
    i doubt he considers paul a franchise player i think he considers him a max player

  18. #18
    Believe. 20beastie45's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    398
    Great read....

    "But Popovich expects the Spurs to carry on past Duncan and Co. Just as the Lakers, Celtics and those other franchises that find a way."


    Do you think that Pop is going to be the next Sloan? Hope so.

  19. #19
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,104
    "time becoming a factor"???

    time has been a factor since 2008

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    1,894
    Detroit didn't have a franchise player when they beat the Lakers in 2006.


    Chauncey Billups? Look what he has done in Denver. This guy is just an outstanding leader on the floor. Too bad he never received the recognition that JKidd, Nash, CP3, DWill and Parker have received the last several years.

  21. #21
    Believe. admiralsnackbar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    4,010
    Chauncey Billups? Look what he has done in Denver. This guy is just an outstanding leader on the floor. Too bad he never received the recognition that JKidd, Nash, CP3, DWill and Parker have received the last several years.
    Weird, isn't it?

  22. #22
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    416
    Detroit didn't have a franchise player when they beat the Lakers in 2006.
    That Pistons team is the one anomally. They had a good system with a bunch of good players but no franchise guy. In fairness though the Lakers imploded in the finals due to the mounting tension between Kobe and Shaq.

  23. #23
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,938
    Chauncey Billups? Look what he has done in Denver. This guy is just an outstanding leader on the floor. Too bad he never received the recognition that JKidd, Nash, CP3, DWill and Parker have received the last several years.
    The original quote mentioned franchise players and max players. With that distinction in place, none of those players you mentioned is a franchise player in my opinion.

    My point in mentioning Detroit is that there is always hope of putting together a team of good (and some great) players and still having a chance at winning a le. Granted, a small chance, but enough to be fired up about another season. Even without Duncan or a franchise player.

  24. #24
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    "The challenge in staying compe ive is not making mistakes," Gregg Popovich said, "is finding guys that fit the system."
    What a load of horse . They just re-upped a player to the tune of 40 million that doesn't fit.

    Don't worry Pop...all the fans will blame you for not adjusting when you spend yet another year trying to stick that square block through that round hole.

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    864
    Problem is there are over 400 players in the NBA and maybe 5 that are franchise players....two of which are on the same team, in LeBron and Wade. I'd say Dwight Howard and Kevin Durant are also franchise players. You'd be hard pressed to find another one. Rose? Williams? Paul?...I dont think so, max players but not franchise players. Duncan and Kobe are on their last legs so they are out.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •