Hill played 4 playoff games at 19 minutes per game his rookie year (First round loss), and Blair played in 10 games at 9.1 minutes per game (Second round loss).
All those guys got a chance to contribute in the playoffs.
Of course apparently none of it means anything now that Malik Hairston is gone.............
Hill played 4 playoff games at 19 minutes per game his rookie year (First round loss), and Blair played in 10 games at 9.1 minutes per game (Second round loss).
He's not called Obstructed View for nothing.![]()
Spurs recent draft record is growing more dismal? So John Solomon, Luis Scola, Leonardo BarBosa, Beno Udrih, Tiago Splitter, George Hill, and Dejuan Blair, are dismal huh?
Except recent history says your wrong. Hill, Blair, and Temple did play as rookies. And Pop does play "even really good ones". Wern't Duncan and to a lesser extent, Parker "really good ones" that Pop played their rookie seasons?
I'm just curious what exactly obstructs his view?![]()
If you have to include Duncan and Parker to make your point, then you probably know that Pop didn't give Blair or Hill enough playing time and you just want to be argumentative.
Actually, if you are talking about rookies drafted by the Spurs then Duncan and Parker should be included...otherwise you're cherry picking your sample to suit your conclusion...
I live in Austin and even though Toros games are cheap I would much rather spend my money seeing the Spurs. D-League games are painful to watch... kind of like watching pickup games at the Y.
The Toros may create added "Spurs interest" in Austin. Austinites may be more loyal to the Spurs with that connection. (Don't be surprised if that's why the Spurs keep them on.)
In fact, that may actually justify their existence. Nothing else does.
The Toros don't create Spurs interest in Austin. Those residents of Austin who were already Spurs fans create Toros interest.
Damn straight.
Several people in this thread have hit on the main point that should be made: the Toros aren't the problem, the D-League as a whole is. It's a very low level league with very low level salaries. Thus, you get very low level talent. On rare occasions you find players who are near NBA-ready, but it's really hard to evaluate because they're playing against scrubs for the most part.
I hope major details about the D-League change in the new CBA. As it is, it's the equivalent of baseball teams trying to bring guys up from Class-A ball.
Right. Manu was such an NBA ready talent that the Spurs used their THIRD pick of the draft,and second of the second round, to make sure that they got him. He didn't even play for just one team in Italy while they were waiting and evaluating him. He was with Reggio Calabria when drafted, and signed with Kinder Bolognia in 2000 (meaning he was available, if not yet NBA ready).
You remembered wrong. Manu was a draft and stash.
Can someone provide a list of DLeaguers who have made a legit contribution to any NBA team?
Not trying to be facetious, I really am curious
Sundiata James of the Jazz is the only one I can think of and that's not a great example.
Go down Golden State's roster: Azabuike and Morrow come to mind.
yup, d league seems pretty worthless. hairston dominated the league, dropping 40 pt games left and right. yet he hasn't improved enough to play in the nba? don't see how much more he can improve in the d league.
In a roundabout way (and by that I mean, it honestly has nothing to do with the Toros' contribution to the Spurs), I'd have to go with ChumpDumper.
He'd definitely get my vote.
What do you expect to get from D-League players?
I saw plenty of people clamoring for Matt Barnes recently, would you have wanted him?
Chris Anderson, how 'bout him?
Kelenna Azubuike?
Bobby Simmons when he was Most Improved Player of the Year?
Anthony Morrow got out of a contract at the last minute playing overseas because the Warriors took a shot on him after going undrafted.
There are players to be found that can play a role for a team if just given the opportunity. That's really all that sets a lot of the role players of teams apart from some of these D-League and overseas players: opportunity.
If the NBA could ever build the D-League into a 30 team league, where every NBA team owns its own NBDL team, then I think you will see more benefits. You will see teams being able to use the DLeague as a farm system and even a valuable rehab option for players coming back from injury.
I'm not even sold on there being 30 NBA teams.
One positive take is if a particular D-League player is not good enough for Pop & the Spurs but, is good enough to make a team like Dallas then I'd say we are ahead of the game.
One other thing is it allows the Spurs management a good evaluation period before they get in too deep with what most of these guys will end up being...the 10th, 11th, 12th or lo and behold, the 13th option.
How did we miss this?
http://www.48minutesof .com/2010/...antonio-spurs/
I posted some thoughts on what I felt the D-League should do about 6 months ago. By no means is this an exhaustive list, but it's a start.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)