in long regular season: Bonner is the better choice.
in the playoffs: Shaq destroys bonned
When I compare 2010 stats Shaq beats out Matt Bonner all around, so does this mean that Shaq could be a better short term investment at a low price than Matt Bonner, long term worth.
in long regular season: Bonner is the better choice.
in the playoffs: Shaq destroys bonned
Shaq is soft now too. He's like the Pillsbury dough boy.
Shaq is both an asset and liability. You have to deal with his 50% free throw shooting if you bring him on and you can bet other teams in the playoffs will employ hack-a-Shaq. His entire games centers on power and he's slowing down but still big enough to put the ball in the hole and clog up the lane defensively.
On the court, yeah of course.
Does Shaq spread the floor? I don't think so... He must have been so lucky to win those rings.
You get about 7 good quotes from Shaq every year, so that alone makes him better than Matt Bonner.
Why not both? Bonner makes the sandwiches, and Shaq eats them.
Shaquille is still the strongest guy in the NBA…
7 good quotes + 7 good sandwiches = championship.![]()
Better question:
Is Matt Bonner better than anyone in the NBA?
I would take Bonner over Yinka Dare any day
bonner>>bogans
bonner>>mason
technically they aren't in the nba because they can't find teams![]()
Yinka Dare is dead!!! Even still, kind of a toss-up.
koriwats left calf tat is better than booner
how did the Spurs get stuck with this guy.
Pop fell in love with Bonner after Finley left him in the alter.
give me shaq all day
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)