Quitting for a reasonable cause does not equate to being a quitter.
Please, don't tell me there is no difference. I'll have to revise my respect for you if you do.
No, WC...Palin did quit to get more money elsewhere, and there was nothing legitimate about her reasons other than a good ole profit motive. Didn't do a damn thing for Alaskans who voted for her, though.
She is toxic as a potential candidate. She is a money-maker for herself and for tea partiers as long as she stays within the far-right cons uency.
she quit because her ignorance was exposed on the national stage. the one smart thing that someone convinced her to do.
You are wrong on both accounts. However, i know it's a waste of time to repeat what has already been said. Your prejudice is apparent, and not movable.
Yet another thread devolves into the comparison of dog and cat .
she needed more personal time to engage a fight with a teenager through the media. lol
writes political buzz words on her hands....cuz she too stupid to remember. lol
used and dumped her kid like a prop. lol
What was reasonable about quitting your public service post, one you were elected for, to pursue your personal agenda?
You say that like it's a good thing.
Also, his academic record is a bit suspect in its own right.
Hi Marcus
Why can't we just admit, once and for all, that both sides suck? We're still free in this country to have a non-binary opinion about something, no?
Apparently not.
I do have a problem with people trying to sell me cat as if it was cat food.
How about the money a small populated state was spending for all the FOI requests? The left was relentless against her, and harming the cash flow Alaska had.
How about the fact she had little or no time to govern.
How about the fact she could seat her Lt. governor rather than wait for elections.
I'd go on, but if these aren't reason enough, then what's the point?
I think the fact that both sides sucks is well-acknowledged. It's all about which sides sucks slightly less than the other.
Agreed.I think the fact that both sides sucks is well-acknowledged. It's all about which sides sucks slightly less than the other.
The last good president we had was Reagan.
Wasn't she a maverick?
What does that tell you about her leadership when she quits because she can't deal with pressure?
Is that really the president you want for this nation?
Whose fault is that????
How about completing the mandate your Alaskans voted you in for? If they wanted the Lt. governor to call the shots, they would have voted him instead.
I really don't know why you feel the urge to apologize for her actions. I mean, on the positive side, she does have executive experience. On the negative side, she is a quitter. Every politician has those plus/minuses. There's nothing to be ashamed about.
Gave some good speeches, ramped up the debt and deficit. Sounds like the current one.
Disagree. I think it was Clinton. I also liked GW senior.
He was a great leader, but a ty president.
GW...
RINO...
Clinton was possibly as conservative as GW.
All three sucked. You gotta go back to Teddy Roosevelt to find a good American president.
I thought both Clinton and Bush Sr were both great leaders and presidents. At least compared to the last two, they were miles ahead.
What an effing change from the 90s to the last decade. We go from a Republican who was willing to raise taxes to address a budget deficit to a Democrat who was willing to declare the era of big government over to address a budget deficit to this re ed dog and cat . Here, here for pragmatic politicians instead of ideological true believer numbskulls.
I'm sorry, I don't go as far back... Maybe Marcus can enlighten us with tales from the time...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote