Reply With Quote
Nah, we've already concluded you are simply afraid to answer because is undermines the argument you didn't know you made and confused with a question you asked.
well, you recalled your gay friends and family members stated position.
those positions were too easy for autopsy.
Nah, we've already concluded you are simply afraid to answer because is undermines the argument you didn't know you made and confused with a question you asked.
Pedophiles can't appeal because children can't give consent. Neither can animals.
Same old issues each time. Jeez.
Of course this ruling will stand up. The Equal protection clause is pretty ing clear. I've said the same thing on these forums for 6 or 7 years. The moment a case found its way to the federal system it was going to be all over for this issue.
No it is an action they choose to partake in.
Prove it.
So you don't really care about them getting married.... you're just bio-curious.....and you just want the gays to shut the up.
Here we go again. Born or not born gay! Like I said before. Telling people you are born gay is a simple easy message. "They just have not found the gay gene yet but it's there, I promise!"
Hey don't get upset with me. You're the one saying it is some sort of biological disorder. I just think it's something they choose which is fine by me.
I still remember the day that I chose to be attracted to the opposite sex. It's a funny story; I'll have to share it one day.
Whether its a choice or not is completely irrelevant to the ruling. You guys can debate it all you want but really it makes no difference.
Pedophiles can't appeal because children can't give consent. Neither can animals.
Same old issues each time. Jeez.
Of course this ruling will stand up. The Equal protection clause is pretty ing clear. I've said the same thing on these forums for 6 or 7 years. The moment a case found its way to the federal system it was going to be all over for this issue.
Siblings and polygamists can consent, right?
you'll eat these words once they're cured!
Yes. And I have no problem with either happening. I addressed this already.
good point. I'm pretty excited to see how the 9th circuit COA will rule.
It was easy for me. I said to myself "Jack, do you want to stick your in and have your own pushed back into your stomach or do you want to do what nature intended you to do with your kawk, stick it is some sweet wet " I picked the pussy.
were you jealous of all the abuse that snakeboy was getting?
if you thought this at the same time.........i'd say it could go either way for you, jack.
how dare I have a differing view hugh. should I be like you and have no convictions unless positive it is the popular one, coward?
shouldn't you be hanging around people hoping they peer pressure you to do something?
tell us, which one is the popular one?
What is the factual backing of your view?
Does it run along the same lines as the testimony for the ban in this case?
so you acknowledge that you can get your aroused for anal sex.
a proposition voted on by the citizens of cali.
this is the first judge to disregard the legal definition of marriage.
Pretty soon the trolls will argue that you really are gay.
Unlike you, dumb , I know when to use the phrase "in my opinion".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
