Reply With Quote
No.
No.
Can you choose to start liking men MH?
apparently, obama and liberal activist judges won't be happy until everybody is gay
No.
No.
Can you choose to start liking men MH?
Ah, so you're just a pussy. Freedom involves some people saying some scary words sometimes. But I guess as long as you feel safe, you don't care what freedoms we don't have.
So you disagree with the First Amendment then? Not sure if you're aware, but alot of Founding Fathers said alot of disagreeable things.
What does the word choose mean?
choose/CHo͞oz/Verb
1. Pick out or select (someone or something) as being the best or most appropriate of two or more alternatives: "he chose a seat facing the door"; "many versions to choose from".
2. Decide on a course of action, typically after rejecting alternatives
That should answer your question.
Anyone can choose anything. I can choose to goats. Doesn't mean I should.
So MiamiHeat is a possible sexual and cannot be trusted.
right. because it's an act and nothing more.
I would like to think so but doubt that would be the case.
Example:
I pay 100% of employee and family health insurance. I don't want them worrying about affording healthcare for their wife/kids or choosing to go without.
At the same time, I would not want to recognize a gay partner as a legitimate spouse and pay for his health care coverage.
It's my ing money and I don't want to spend it that way.
The way this is going, I would be forced into the moral choice of either being forced to pay for the gay spouses health care or deciding not to pay for ANY spouses. I couldn't choose to do one and not the other but I could legally choose not to do either.
So you can choose to start liking men, if you wish? Try to then, I dare ya. Try to go a week finding men sexually attractive.
You don't have to act on it. Just start liking them, and tell us how it worked for you.
Calling me a pussy. Ha. Far from it.Ah, so you're just a pussy. Freedom involves some people saying some scary words sometimes. But I guess as long as you feel safe, you don't care what freedoms we don't have.
You don't understand what I said, maybe I should write it better.
Holding rallys for the hatred of a person based solely on something they cannot change, is wrong. It serves no purpose. An artificial superiority complex, and it's something that can never achieve balance or equilibrium because blacks can't magically turn white. It never ends.
Holding a rally to on a politician for his beliefs or actions, is completely fine with me.
Can you tell the difference?
Yeah, you clearly didn't get what I meant.
so, you don't respect that employee like you would the others.
What if you knew one of your married male employees was ing every lady in his neighborhood, or your right-hand man and his wife were polyamorous or very busy swingers.
Would your Holy Roller morals make you fire them, or quit paying their health insurance?
Do pacifists get to choose not to pay taxes for the Defense Department?
There's alot of things that people pay for that they don't agree to.
Anyone is a possible anything. You are a possible terrorist who secretly posts on Al-Qaeda websites.
The KKK regularly rally against Jews too. Since a person's religion can be changed, you approve of such rallies.
He pretty much nailed it. You want to be the arbiter of free speech rights in the US.Yeah, you clearly didn't get what I meant.
You act like that's new.
Ever had a co-worker or employee who you didn't like?
Heck, you don't like me. Let's say I was your employee. Hi. You wouldn't respect like you would the others.
Pot meet kettle.
I'm not talking about what the government does with my tax money. I'm talking about the government mandating what I do with MY money.
Understand...I don't have to pay for ANYONES insurance if I don't want to.
OK, potential sexual.
I agree that it's wrong to support such a cause. However, I believe they have the RIGHT to say what they wish. That's an American ideal. Why?
Let's say a member of the KKK comes to power somehow. Would you want him to detail what you could and coulnd't say? Of course not.
Besides, letting people say stupid things is a good way to find who the stupid people are.
As I've been saying, surely you can see the difference between supporting the actions of a person, and supporting their right to do.
Ok, I get where you're coming from now, but I still don't see a big distinction. After all, tax money is technically "your" money too, isn't it?
but they were big on the whole racism against blacks thing, right? I was referring to that.
Can't you try harder, ChumpDumper? That was weak on the logic front. Very weak.
Say whatever you want about others on the grounds of their actions, their words, their beliefs, their ideals, their character, whatever.
Inciting hatred over something that is impossible to change or improve, such as color of skin, your height, your facial features, color of your hair, or your mental illness, should be disallowed.
you're all over the place. did you forget what i asked CC?
But they are also big on the whole antisemitic thing too. I was referring to that.
It's your logic -- why don't you own it?Can't you try harder, ChumpDumper? That was weak on the logic front. Very weak.
Since a person's religion can be changed, you approve of KKK rallies against Jews.
Yes or no?
But religion is ok.Say whatever you want about others on the grounds of their actions, their words, their beliefs, their ideals, their character, whatever.
Inciting hatred over something that is impossible to change or improve, such as color of skin, your height, your facial features, color of your hair, or your mental illness, should be disallowed.
You want to be the arbiter of free speech in the US. You just posted your manifesto.
And since you consider sexuality a mental illness, you just committed a hate crime in this thread according to your criteria.
Good job
You see, its OK if we force gay business owners to pay for hetero spouses but god forbid CC be told to pay for spouses.
Oh and LOL @ MH accusing anyone else of weak logic.
thats different since everyone benefits from that. There is no free lunch here. A better example, if using the govt., would be paying school taxes if you don't have children who go to school.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
