Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 94
  1. #51
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Let's keep it real though. China may have ninjas, but we still have Chuck Norris.



    Threat level minimum imo.
    don't forget van damn

  2. #52
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    don't forget van damn
    He's Belgian...

  3. #53
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Is this thing made out of plastic?

    I wonder how much stuff the US Military uses have a 'Made in China' tag on it.

  4. #54
    Who the Fuck are Man Utd?
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    184
    Here's what I don't get:

    Conservatives are opposed to government handouts, because they (rightfully in some cases) ask, "If the government is handing out money, why should people work?"

    But then they look at the global stage, and say, "America needs to be the policeman of the world!" If we're willing to provide defensive capabilities for the rest of the world, why would other countries fund their militaries? Wouldn't they just piggyback off us?
    if every country is disarmed then US military can also be dismissed for retrenchment. the problem is there's always some malicious country/group who's all-time ready to arouse some riots once US military loosens its nerve. Some of US allies whereas are facing far less threats than US does. Some terror attack may still happen in some allies, like the bombing in Madrid etc., but those attacks were mostly launched by the domestic terrors (like the Basque bas s in Madrid bombing). Some spare defense would be well enough to protect the allies like SK Japan etc., as it's still the US who's targeted on by the biggest terror threats like Taliban etc....

  5. #55
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    Terry,

    Yes, the US is mostly targeted... but that could be due to the fact that we're the world's biggest power, and we're always over there. If Britain was still big, terorrists would be going after them more often than us.

  6. #56
    Who the Fuck are Man Utd?
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    184
    Do you think the US is the only country with a navy?
    without aircraft carriers it's fair to say a country has basically no marine force. maybe they have the tech to projectile a missile to hit a target hundreds of miles away, but the target has to be a static one unlike the aircraft carrier which keeps moving all the time.

  7. #57
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    without aircraft carriers it's fair to say a country has basically no marine force. maybe they have the tech to projectile a missile to hit a target hundreds of miles away, but the target has to be a static one unlike the aircraft carrier which keeps moving all the time.
    Do you think the US is the only country with a marine force?

  8. #58
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    China makes me shutter. Here we are, fighting two wars and falling in terrible debt, with a collapsing economy back home, looking the ass in front of the world. What's China doing? Developing game-changing technology, loaning us money, and biding their time. China is going to be a unified, highly developed, and powerful nation in 30 years, and we're still going to be good ol' Americans: a bunch of bickering, war-mongering, partisan, Made-In-China lovin' s.

  9. #59
    Banned
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    7,516
    China makes me shutter. Here we are, fighting two wars and falling in terrible debt, with a collapsing economy back home, looking the ass in front of the world. What's China doing? Developing game-changing technology, loaning us money, and biding their time. China is going to be a unified, highly developed, and powerful nation in 30 years, and we're still going to be good ol' Americans: a bunch of bickering, war-mongering, partisan, Made-In-China lovin' s.
    ha ha ha.

    As soon as China tries anything, say goodbye to the debt we owed them. Thanks for the money, China!

    If they ever hope to keep getting paid, they better not do anything

    and even if they did, the world knows we have enough nuclear weapons to blow the entire globe to pieces. nobody would try.


    sleep well, little children. china isn't coming to get you

  10. #60
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    China makes me shutter. Here we are, fighting two wars and falling in terrible debt, with a collapsing economy back home, looking the ass in front of the world. What's China doing? Developing game-changing technology, loaning us money, and biding their time. China is going to be a unified, highly developed, and powerful nation in 30 years, and we're still going to be good ol' Americans: a bunch of bickering, war-mongering, partisan, Made-In-China lovin' s.
    Cut.
    Print.
    Truth.

  11. #61
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    ha ha ha.

    As soon as China tries anything, say goodbye to the debt we owed them. Thanks for the money, China!

    If they ever hope to keep getting paid, they better not do anything

    and even if they did, the world knows we have enough nuclear weapons to blow the entire globe to pieces. nobody would try.

    sleep well, little children. china isn't coming to get you
    You're talking right now, zosa is talking 30 years from now.
    The reality is that if we don't do something about the ever extending debt, our economy will crumble sooner or later. Meaning all that spending on the military simply won't be possible, because we will be effectively broke.

    And all those ICBMs are nice, but sooner than later, at the pace the tech is going, and with a country that both has the tech and the economic means to do it, having missile interceptors (aka missile defense system) is not a far fetched idea at all.

    So, yeah, I don't think China is coming to get us right now, maybe not in the next 10 years, but eventually, if we don't get our act together, and when we manage to lose the nuclear threat (which is going to happen), then it could get really hairy out there. Specially if we're ing broke.

  12. #62
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    ...the article says China could sink an aircraft carrier IF the weapon becomes operational in a year or two AND the U.S. doesn't come up with some countermeasures - which they always do...

    For another thing, it says this is a mach 10 weapon. The U.S. has been testing a scram-jet engine for a couple of years that can supposedly go that fast, so somehow China already has one and it's almost operational. Right ...

    Last, IF china has a mach 10 weapon (they don't), something going that fast isn't exactly "nimble" and can turn on a dime. But still it has to hit a carrier moving at over 30 knots.

    Fear and hype people, fear and hype ...

  13. #63
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    ...the article says China could sink an aircraft carrier IF the weapon becomes operational in a year or two AND the U.S. doesn't come up with some countermeasures - which they always do...

    For another thing, it says this is a mach 10 weapon. The U.S. has been testing a scram-jet engine for a couple of years that can supposedly go that fast, so somehow China already has one and it's almost operational. Right ...

    Last, IF china has a mach 10 weapon (they don't), something going that fast isn't exactly "nimble" and can turn on a dime. But still it has to hit a carrier moving at over 30 knots.

    Fear and hype people, fear and hype ...
    It's a missile, not a plane. It could easily be rocket powered. It doesn't need an engine. Scramjet engines like the X51 ones actually need to be accelerated to Mach 7 in order to be used, and that's done using a detachable rocket.

    As far as accuracy, well, when you're moving at almost 128 miles per minute, you just need to aim right.

    What I'd be more interested in knowing is what's it's range.
    Last edited by ElNono; 08-07-2010 at 12:10 AM.

  14. #64
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Don't get me wrong. It could simply be a smoke screen also.

  15. #65
    Believe. byrontx's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    600
    Is this thing made out of plastic?

    I wonder how much stuff the US Military uses have a 'Made in China' tag on it.
    This is what I consider spooky. So much of our networking equipment is manufactured in China (the Lantronix equipment we install in military networks, for example) that one has to assume that China has thoroughly infiltrated our military networks. I suppose the same is true of other networks as well including political and commericial networks. I am sure that we have some great tricks up our sleeves but in the cyber-war aspect of of a modern war it looks like China has the edge.

  16. #66
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    And all those ICBMs are nice, but sooner than later, at the pace the tech is going, and with a country that both has the tech and the economic means to do it, having missile interceptors (aka missile defense system) is not a far fetched idea at all.
    Missile defense systems are definitely not fail-proof, and there are none that I know of that can counter the amount of missiles we could theoretically launch. Not to mention we have superior air capability.

  17. #67
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    This is what I consider spooky. So much of our networking equipment is manufactured in China (the Lantronix equipment we install in military networks, for example) that one has to assume that China has thoroughly infiltrated our military networks. I suppose the same is true of other networks as well including political and commericial networks. I am sure that we have some great tricks up our sleeves but in the cyber-war aspect of of a modern war it looks like China has the edge.
    Lantronix? Eh, maybe in some places. I know the AF is mostly Cisco-based infra, with some Foundry and Sun mixed in.

    And I severely doubt that China's cyberwar capabilities are greater than our militaries, or that they've infiltrated our military networks. And they definitely don't have a major presence on SIPRNet since it's isolated, which is where most of the classified info resides.

    China's best way to get intel is good ol' fashiong HUMINT. And I say this as someone who is a network technician in the AF, active duty. (Of course, I'm seeing things from a low level, I don't have Pentagon level access or anything, and if I did, I wouldn't be saying something about that anyhow.)

  18. #68
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,020
    What I'd be more interested in knowing is what's it's range.
    About 900 miles, but from what little I've read, the missile guidance may not be quite up to snuff yet.

  19. #69
    Believe. admiralsnackbar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    4,010
    Here's what I don't get:

    Conservatives are opposed to government handouts, because they (rightfully in some cases) ask, "If the government is handing out money, why should people work?"

    But then they look at the global stage, and say, "America needs to be the policeman of the world!" If we're willing to provide defensive capabilities for the rest of the world, why would other countries fund their militaries? Wouldn't they just piggyback off us?
    The "policemen of the world" thing is PR, I think. We're protecting trade partners, and this protection is monetized by discounted tariffs on our goods and/or cheap access to X country's natural resources.

    We don't protect any nation, just those that offer us market share, impede our compe ors' strategic partnerships, or offer us natural resources.

  20. #70
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    Let's keep it real though. China may have ninjas, but we still have Chuck Norris.



    Threat level minimum imo.
    China has zero ninjas, buttbrain.

  21. #71
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    He's Belgian...
    It aint were you from- it's where you at.

  22. #72
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    The guidance isn't going to be there. How are they going to track our carriers? Land based radar? HA, those are gone in the first stage of a modern war against the US if they're on. Airborne radar? Does China even have any AWAACs capability? If they do they're going to be bone fairly soon also if they come within range of a carrier's air group. You can't launch missile's off old satellite data unless you want to blow up empty patches of water.

  23. #73
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    About 900 miles, but from what little I've read, the missile guidance may not be quite up to snuff yet.
    Expected.

  24. #74
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Does China even have any AWAACs capability?
    Since 2005: KJ-2000

  25. #75
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    A load of nukes.
    One thing they are afraid of is someone who is not a representative of a country, but gets a nuke or two.
    27,000 Nuclear Weapons. One Is Missing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •