Reply With Quote
batting 1.000
damn that felony fights thing.. that guy was about to in die!
but really i wish that guy didn't lose the bat. oh well
batting 1.000
Here's some more high class entertainment.
cameraman having an orgasm
lol, doubt that. im sure there are posters here who have balls of steel. the thing is we are too smart to deal with those losers. call the cops and sue for damages.
Exactly. Sue what? Some drunk dude bashing cars? I'am sure he has plenty of money to sue for.
piiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnng
in tight. I wish I had an opportunity to baseball bat someone's face; goddamn Utah.
So to you guys who posted they will shoot those bas s; Would you really? You seriously telling us you are willing to be raped in prison because your car got dinged and your ego bruised? Hardcore!
Me, I'll pay my $250 insurance deductible and have an awesome paint job.
Damn, that felony fight is brutal. Did you see that fat Mexican drop knees on the white guy that was knocked out. Ouch.
Being attacked by 6 people, I don't know, I think you might be able to claim self-defense. Might be a little bit of danger there 1v6, don't ya think?
Just guessing.
that first guy with his shirt off deserves death. its a shame he wasn't killed. what a piece of . lol at the dude barely getting away though. I thought they were gonna drag him out of the car.
Scenarios: Same scene but replace the bat with a gun
- If there were no videos used as evidence then I think the defendant can probably get away with jail time since he can just say they jumped him first.
-Let's say the video was used as evidence. The dude in the car already was out of harm's way. He could've just drove away after the initial attack. But, he stepped out of the car and instigated another attack.
You have to give the gang props for taking those hits. Piinnngg!!!
LOL at the shirtless guy calming down for a few secs after getting hit by the bat.
Famous words from my brother who is a LEO. 'I feared for my life'.
Camera man was a fan.
lol son at first I thought I was watching the College World Series live from Omaha ... pingggg!
nice avatar for a ' '
Well, they were still up after the hit so that should be women's softball.
I'm on my third beer at the end of a day that no amount of alcohol can erase; an hour and a half shopping with three kids for school supplies, an hour and a half at the social security admin building with everybody and their damn mother in the city. So I come here, looking for a weary laugh, or perhaps at least a smile... to be confronted, once again, with undeniable proof that the human race is devolving and should be terminated.
It's all too much.
black people are known to carry guns I believe it
dumb ass got his window broken for nothing
speaking of bats one just flew into my house
Easy solution ma
Just be glad that these fools don't live in Texas my friend.
http://www.gunlaws.com/TXBills2007/SB378%20Summary.html
As it is written in Texas state law
The Castle Doctrine
Legislative Session: 80(R)
Senate Bill 378
Senate Author: Wentworth et al.
Effective: 9-1-07
House Sponsor: Driver et al.
Senate Bill 378 amends provisions of the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the use of force or deadly force in defense of a person. The bill creates a presumption of reasonableness for the belief of a person who takes such action that the use of force or deadly force to protect the actor was immediately necessary and provides that the presumption would be reasonable if the actor:
1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force or deadly force was used unlawfully and with force entered, or attempted to enter, the actor's home, vehicle, or place of business or employment; unlawfully and with force removed, or attempted to remove, the actor from the home, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or was committing or attempting to commit certain serious crimes;
2) did not provoke the person against whom the force or deadly force was used; and
3) was not otherwise engaged in certain criminal activity at the time the force or deadly force was used.
The bill provides that an actor who has a right to be present at the location where the force or deadly force is used, who has not provoked the person against whom the force is used, and who is not engaged in criminal activity at that time is not required to retreat before using force or deadly force.
Senate Bill 378 also provides immunity from civil liability for a personal injury or death resulting from the use of force or deadly force to a defendant who was justified under the law in using such force or deadly force.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
