Prime Paul is better than prime Nowitzki. Nowitzki could have never done with the '08 Hornets what Paul did with them. Nowitzki is a vastly overrated, one dimensional player. I know he's a very efficient player and his stats look nice, but sometimes you have to look beyond that. This guy is a certified choker in games that actually matter and can't affect the game if he's not scoring.
The Spurs were the third best team in the West by the end of last season. Forget about them being the 7th seed. The first 2/3 of their season was ostensibly an extended training camp.
Also, considering how close 2-8 was in the West, anyone who thinks there's a significant gap between any of those teams is a fool. The point is, it's not like it would take a lot for the Spurs to go from 7 to 3. Next season, all the stars are aligned for them to hit the ground running.
I'm not going to assume Duncan will drop another level. If anything, he should be playing less games, a few less minutes but more importantly, a lot less arduous minutes, which should preserve him better throughout the season. When he's fresh, he can still dominate a game as much as any big man in the league. Ginobili's age is irrelevant. He's perilously close to his peak, so there's no point in even bringing up his age. Why is is that with Bryant and Nowitzki, their age rarely get's mentioned, but with Ginobili it always does?
Too many Spurs fans have become too critical of this team, picking them apart relentlessly, yet building up virtually every other credible team in the league as if they're all significantly better. I'm not saying the Spurs should be mentioned with the Lakers, Heat, Celtics and Magic (not at this writing, at least), but acting like there's no chance they could get home court or advance deep into the playoffs is ridiculous.

Reply With Quote


