right, but the "you" here is actually you.
Well, duh.
I can see how some readers would make up a new hit list in their minds.then why include the info about his opposition to the stated justifications for war? wouldnt the author understand the implications from this inclusion? dont most readers? dont you?
The writer never says he was on any hit list other than the Iraqi one. You inferred there was another hit list.and as for him just stating this plainly, why would the author come out and say either faction might have done it? in fact he never does. he just implies. one to a greater degree, based on the strength of evidence alone. but both inferences can be drawn based on the info.
right, but the "you" here is actually you.
Last edited by Parker2112; 08-16-2010 at 03:00 PM.
The manner of address was emphatic: think twice, hippie!
OIC. This is meant to lure us over near the bushes, the better to witness the show. You'd probably even like us to beat the bushes for you, eh?
No offense, but no thanks.
Cf., Heraclitus.
Cf,. Manuscript found at Saragossa, UBIK.A person in (the) night kindles a light for himself, since his vision has been extinguished. In his sleep he touches that which is dead, though (himself) alive, when awake touches that which sleeps.
two chicks is always a good time?
"The upward-downward path" (hodos ano kato) takes on a whole nother significance there.
You dodge much?
I've never had the good fortune of dodging two chicks!
btw, wtf are trying to say?!?!
It can be. I wouldn't count on that, tho.
Both the Jan Patocki novel and PKD's UBIK use intricately inter-nested metanarratives to blur the line between reality and dream/afterlife to strikingly hallucinogenic effect.
@Parker2112:
Your suggestion that everyone else here would be asleep but for your exertions, I find hilarious.
Isn't there some way to make a very similar point without putting every body else down?
"we have enough sheepish skepticism" does not = "everyone else here would be asleep but for my exertions"
but glad you got a laugh out of it though...
"we have enough sheepish skepticism" does not = "putting every body else down"
again, your preconceptions win out over reality. this is becoming habit winehole...
and final note, as I have said before, and I will repeat to you, I dont have the answers...I come here for opinions...sheep refers to those who refuse to challenge their preconceptions...
Cf., Pink Anderson.
Cf., Floyd Council.
Cf., Animals.
I may have overread you somewhat when you said,
just after you said:we have enough sheepish skepticism on this board as it isIn other words, by suggesting that the role of WH23 is to put posters back to bed, you also insinuated the board was already asleep in general.dont be lulled to sleep, and I suggest you dont promote that readers should go back to sleep either.
You either overlooked the plain meaning of your own words or selectively edited your own comments. Pick one.
Last edited by Winehole23; 08-17-2010 at 10:13 AM.
Plus, it just grates that you seem to think others are asleep merely because they are not receptive to what you say.
nah....I think you overreacted based on personal bias.
I can be biased while you're acting like a conceited jackass. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
I agree with ChumpyD. You smuggled an inference in.
Your defense of it now still smuggles it in.
everyone knows full well what the implications are based on the facts stated. you do to winehole.
I dont deny acting like this...as does damn near the entire forum at times. and I would say at least 50% do it with more regularity than me. I cant help that you view me through the bully list, but understand that the bias doesnt help your logic much.
Everybody knows. Perhaps. But the OP did not point the finger itself: for that we have you, P2112.
How comforting.![]()
glad I could put you at ease!
the thing is winehole, I dont deny being a jerk, an ass etc., but the bottom line is Im not going to reign it in for your viewing pleasure. And though I acknowledge I get quality views in some of your posts, I am not going to curb my enthusiasm for you. sorry sir.
(is slightly creeped out by ^^^)
(as enthusiasm courses...)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)