I don't understand why anyone would listen to anything she has to say.
Jennifer Aniston is such a . She uses inappropriate words such as "re : on national tv and shamelessly promotes lesbianism by saying a man is not needed for a woman to have a baby.
she is without a doubt my least favorite hollywood personality. she represents what is wrong with arrogant, self hating white woman in america.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_675038.html
I don't understand why anyone would listen to anything she has to say.
Agreed. She's an awful actress as well, not sure why movie studios think she's a box office pull. She's thoroughly un-engaging and bland.
you are one stupid mother er, you know that?and shamelessly promotes lesbianism by saying a man is not needed for a woman to have a baby
Agree manu there was some shame in her comments when she promoted her lesbian roots
real talk tbh
tim duncan called the nba's dress code re ed.
Add Susan Sarandon to this list. A soft serve spout spews out more intelligence than her.
Everyone here would still do her if they had the chance to though, right?
Sons she put her career before her marriage, got what she deserved NOW she wants a kid?
She has great legs.![]()
Of course
s would not that little .
white guys dont want her.
neither do blacks.
Does this mean she will quit acting? Will she go on Larry King Live and apologize? Didn't Obama make fun of re ed people too? He didn't quit his job or apologize on Larry King Live.
She was ing hot at the beginning of FRIENDS. One of a body.
Incorrect. I'd still hit it![]()
no man, shes overrated man...but who cares
Yeah she's hot and she knows it. The worst kind.
Quit whining about someone saying "re " you bunch of pussies. Who ing cares. Is she not en led to use it like every single one of you probably do at least once a day because she's a celebrity? Who gives a what she thinks or has to say. Talk about crying over nothing.
If you care what she thinks, you're re ed
Men who are threatened by women who aren't subservient are funny, and kind of pathetic.
There are plenty of women who are NOT Lesbians who have a baby without a man. In point of fact, the human species could continue after a fashion with NO MEN WHATSOEVER using cloning and/or pathenogensis. The reverse is not true, since no artificial womb exists, or is even on the near term horizon.
You've got that just backwards, "son", but that's to be expected, since you were the audience for that post you quoted.
If not for women, we'd still be living in caves, killing animals by hand to crack their bones open for marrow, and hitting each other over the heads with the bone remains.
Much worse gets posted here on a daily basis from Spurstalk.com LA fans such as lakaluva.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)