Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35
  1. #1
    Dryer than Kunta's ankles Ashy Larry's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    3,803
    The Lakers may be the team of right now (and, perhaps, next season, according to a majority of our panel of 93 NBA experts). But will the reigning champs have to make way for the next wave over the next 10 years?


    Pat Riley has assembled a virtual All-Star team in Miami, arming the Heat with three of the biggest young guns in the game in LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh. And with South Beach's three brightest stars all under 30 years old, Miami appears primed to make its mark on the league for the foreseeable future.


    But while the Heat were runaway winners this off-season, they'll have some stiff compe ion on the court. The Thunder stayed relatively silent throughout the summer despite having just one playoff appearance on their books. But with one of the game's rising stars in Kevin Durant and a roster brimming with young talent, some of our staff is already sold. And don't forget about the Lakers, whose case is made by one glance at their ring fingers.



    For the current decade (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019), which team will be considered the greatest? Here's how we see things:

    2010-11 Forecast: Team of the Decade

    RANK
    1
    Miami Heat
    2009-10 record: 47-35
    Future Power Ranking: No. 1
    Avg. age: 28 | '10 All-Stars: 3

    56Votes





    2
    Oklahoma City Thunder
    2009-10 record: 50-32
    Future Power Ranking: No. 3
    Avg. age: 24 | '10 All-Stars: 1

    21 Votes





    3
    Los Angeles Lakers
    2009-10 record: 57-25
    Future Power Ranking: No. 2
    Avg. age: 29 | '10 All-Stars: 2

    11Votes





    4
    Chicago Bulls
    2009-10 record: 41-41
    Future Power Ranking: No. 4
    Avg. age: 27 | '10 All-Stars: 1

    2 Votes

    Also receiving votes: L.A. Clippers (1), New York (1), Orlando (1)



    Experts: Team of the Decade?



    Henry Abbott, TrueHoop: Miami Heat.
    They're going to win a lot of games, draw a ton of attention, and shake up a lot of traditional ideas about how teams are formed, what traditional teams look like and who holds the power in the NBA. What has started as a story loaded with anger and betrayal will, with les, come to look like a new model.





    J.A. Adande, ESPN.com: Miami Heat.
    It might not happen immediately, but the Heat have too much talent and Pat Riley is too savvy to let it go to waste. Riley will patch up whatever holes become evident on the roster and address any coaching issues that come up (even if he handles them himself). You might hate them, but you'd better get used to seeing them in June.





    Kevin Arnovitz, TrueHoop: Miami Heat.
    The Heat have three top-15 players in the primes of their careers. They certainly won't win every le, but they should be in the conversation for as long as their core remains in place.





    Larry Coon, ESPN.com: Miami Heat.
    While 2011 won't be their year, the 2010s definitely will be their decade. Pat Riley will complete the remake over the next couple years, parlaying trades and midlevel signings into a solid supporting cast around (insert your favorite nickname for Bron, Wade and Bosh here). Once that happens, look out.





    Zach Harper, TrueHoop Network: Oklahoma City Thunder.
    The reason I'm so high on the future of the Thunder is not because of Kevin Durant's scoring ability, Scott Brooks' seemingly brilliant coaching or Sam Presti being the perfect architect for a franchise designing a le run.
    It's because they were a top-10 defensive team in the NBA last season, even though seven of their nine rotation players were under 26 years old. Getting a team this young to surround the best pure scorer in the NBA with great defense gives them a huge advantage in growing toward a le or three.






    John Hollinger, ESPN.com: Miami Heat.
    Not only have they managed to put together a star-studded trio, but they should be able to add talent in the coming years by using their cap exceptions. The biggest threat isn't even from another team -- it's from the next collective bargaining agreement. A hard cap, or one that further restricts the use of exceptions, will wreak havoc with Miami's ability to augment the roster around Bosh, Wade and James.







    Chris Sheridan, ESPN.com: Oklahoma City Thunder.
    It comes back to Kevin Durant, my pick for player of the decade, and what a special talent he is. The Thunder have also surrounded him with solid, young, complementary pieces that have only begun to scratch the surface of what they are capable of (especially Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka; I am not as sold on Jeff Green), and they have a great coach who is still young enough to relate to such a young team. If the core sticks together, the sky is the limit -- especially over the last five years of the decade.







    Marc Stein, ESPN.com: Los Angeles Lakers.
    Hate to keep dragging the business side of the game into the discussion, but the prospect of a lockout and the uncertainty of what the next collective bargaining agreement will bring in terms of teams' ability to put pieces around their stars can't be ignored. The Heat have a better chance in this area than any one Heater has of denying Kobe in the player of the decade hunt, but the worst-case lockout/CBA scenarios give the Lakers another leg up here.
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/s...0-TeamOfDecade

  2. #2
    Ur a fkn wanker Venti Quattro's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    29,402
    Marc Stein loves the Lakers

  3. #3
    you fail at trollin' me TheMACHINE's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    9,853
    without major fall out (ie. Hatred in the locker room or Kobe announcing he has HIV)....the lakers will be able to rebuild failry easily.

  4. #4
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    As long as the Californian economy doesn't collapse, it will be the Lakers. We will see in 2013 that somehow the Lakers will be able to trade a rotting coarpse of Fisher, 2 2nd round picks, and the rights to Luke Walton for Dwight Howard, a first round pick, and $2 million in cash.

  5. #5
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    That'd make it like O & 53!

    Christ, I'm tumescent.

  6. #6
    you fail at trollin' me TheMACHINE's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    9,853
    when Kobe retires, we'll get OJ Mayo to take his place and put Anthony Randolph as our 6th man and drop LO.

  7. #7
    Dryer than Kunta's ankles Ashy Larry's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    3,803
    Heat can have the next decade on lock ... you can say they have three of the top fifteen players in the league. But South Florida won't care. If you would seen that last parade they had you would have thought those people gathered for the L.A. Sparks. Was pretty sad to see so few people.

    , Dolphins games blacked out and empty seats at two Florida Marlin World Series games should tell you all you need to know about that fan base.

  8. #8
    CDs Nuts. resistanze's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Post Count
    23,869
    when Kobe retires, we'll get OJ Mayo to take his place and put Anthony Randolph as our 6th man and drop LO.
    Nope. Durant and Howard.

  9. #9
    you fail at trollin' me TheMACHINE's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    9,853
    Nope. Durant and Howard.
    sounds good with me! but i was beaing more realistic. buahaha

  10. #10
    Believe. Kevin Durant 35's Avatar
    My Team
    Oklahoma City Thunder
    Post Count
    435
    Thunders gonna be like the Spurs in the last decade imo, But Heat will probably own the decade..

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Post Count
    1,220
    No one will beat the Heat for a long time. Easy choice here.

  12. #12
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    Has to be Miami.

    But I'll bring up a darkhorse from the Western Conference that could become the best team in the decade out west... Portland Trailblazers. Lol, hey it could happen.

    Now go clean yourself up, tlongII.

  13. #13
    King of Queens jason54858's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    165
    As long as the Californian economy doesn't collapse, it will be the Lakers. We will see in 2013 that somehow the Lakers will be able to trade a rotting coarpse of Fisher, 2 2nd round picks, and the rights to Luke Walton for Dwight Howard, a first round pick, and $2 million in cash.
    Well if that's the case then it wont be the Lakers. I hate to say it but its gonna be the Heat's decade.

  14. #14
    Believe. Amaso's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    758
    The Lakers will always be relevant, just like the Yankees. Odds are it will be the Lakers again.

  15. #15
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    The Lakers will always be relevant, just like the Yankees. Odds are it will be the Lakers again.
    Relevant doesn't mean they'll be the team of the decade.

    Lakers in the 1990s? Yankees in the 1980s?

  16. #16
    Veteran 8FOR!3's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,211
    The safe picks in this order are MIA, OKC, LA.

    But in all honesty, the Spurs are going for 5 more in the next 10 years. It can be done.

  17. #17
    Champ Ace's Avatar
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Post Count
    5,448
    The Lakers will always be relevant, just like the Yankees. Odds are it will be the Lakers again.
    No not really

  18. #18
    Each Day Offers Potential Darrin's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    4,675
    With the lack of contenders in the Western Conference once San Antonio, the LA Lakers, Phoenix Suns, and Dallas Mavericks finally collapse, I could see one team dominating the Western Conference in this decade. The only team I see with the system, the best player, and the skill in drafting to be that team is the Oklahoma City Thunder. Sacramento may enjoy some time as a Conference contender. I like their nucleus. Portland still cannot stay healthy and they will have to open the purse-strings to keep half of their talent. They remind me of the late-90s LA Lakers with Elden Campbell, Eddie Jones, Derek Fisher, Kobe Bryant, Shaquille O'Neal, and Nick Van Exel. They had to clear out some of the talent to make a nucleus and afford the team. I think that will have to happen in Portland for them to go anywhere. And injuries to Roy and Oden are still a concern. Houston and Utah might be okay if they can avoid the injury bug. I think Chris Paul and Carmelo Anthony will have to find team success by leaving their current cities and where they end up, I don't know.

    My point is that it will be much easier for a West team to make 8 trips in 10 years to the NBA Finals than it will be in the East, which is growing into the deeper of the two Conferences, if you look 5 years down the road. That doesn't mean the West will have the le favorite year-in and year-out. So we may be looking at an Atlanta Braves/Buffalo Bills-type conundrum: what is the great accomplishment--3 les in 10 years or 7 Finals trips in the same amount of time?

  19. #19
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    42,293
    Is this a serious question?..are the people that didn't vote for Miami unaware of what happened during Free Agency?..

  20. #20
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    The safe picks in this order are MIA, OKC, LA.

    But in all honesty, the Spurs are going for 5 more in the next 10 years. It can be done.
    The Skunker withstanding.

  21. #21
    Pump Bacon Cane's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    3,687
    Easily the Heat and they're only going to get better in the coming years. Crazy that Pat Riley and the Super Friends grabbed even the current supporting cast though.

  22. #22
    ambchang is my bitch Daddy_Of_All_Trolls's Avatar
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Post Count
    976
    I can see why Miami gets the most votes, but this question, although natural, is premature. It's forecast accuracy largely depends on what happens the next 4 years.

    First, a little history:

    In the 1970's Team of the decade was supposed to be, in order, Reed's Knicks, Kareem's Bucks, WIlt's Lakers, Havlicek's Celtics, Barry's Warriors, Walton's Blazers, and Sikma's Sonics....All those teams broke up and had some sorry turns for the worse. No team won more than 2 les, thus no team of the decade.

    In the 1980's It was supposed to be between the Lakers, Celtics and Sixers. Sonica were and early favorite. Lakers led the west thoughout most of the decade winning half the les. Sixers owned the east the first 4 years, Celtics the next 4 and Pistons the last 3. Lakers 5 les, Boston 3, Sixers 1, Pistons 2 (Yeah, that makes 11 les, some decades need to be shortened or lengthened to faily represent player eras.)

    1990's Pistons were supposed to rule as logical early choice, but Jordan got some teammates and took it over. Chicago 6 les, Rockets 2 les

    2000's was supposed to be Shaq's Lakers, then the Spurs, the Lakers closed it out on top. Lakers 5 les, Spurs 4 in 12 years (Yah, I extended the decade to count player eras.)

    The way to logically address this question is to examine windows of opportunity open for contending teams.

    Teams with championship experience, as constructed, are Spurs with 3 les, Lakers with 2 les and Celtics with 1. Teams with finals experience, as constructed are Dallas and Orlando. Not all these teams will win in the next 4 years because their windows pretty much close by or before then, but all have a chance, that's why they play.

    Miami of course will be a logical choice if you are picking now because of talent and youth. When does their window close? It's either 2014 (player options) or 2016 when contracts end. Too many variables now to determine how long the window remains open for them. If they win at least 2 les by 2014, it could extend to 2020.

    So, I think it's safe to say the windows of opportunities should not be thought of past 2014 because of all the variables that are going to show up.

    Here's a comparison of windows, open for debate, based on key players, age, and experience through 2014. To say that any of these teams does not have a chance for a le while their window is open shows a fundamental lak of logic and basketball knowledge.:

    2012 Celtics (Garentt and Allen expire)
    2012 Spurs (Longer if Big 3 stay put and productive)
    2012 Mavericks (It could be 2014)
    2012 Magic (Could also be 2014)
    2014 Blazers
    2014 Bulls
    2014 Thunder
    2014 Heat
    2014 Lakers (Kobe and Pau expire)
    2014 ????? Knicks?

    That makes about 10 teams shooting for 4 les in 4 seasons. By force some will remain without a le, but that doesn't mean they don't have a chance. We can better forecast a team of the decade in 2014 when we can examine the new windows of opportunity that will exist. some teams above will remain on the list, others will fall out, and new ones will be added.

  23. #23
    NB:lol Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_ Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fa kers_ 21_Blessings's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,765

    Lakers in the 1990s?
    The Lakers won a championship in the 90s?

    Jammy choosing to post stupid.

  24. #24
    Dryer than Kunta's ankles Ashy Larry's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    3,803
    Relevant doesn't mean they'll be the team of the decade.

    Lakers in the 1990s? Yankees in the 1980s?

    Both teams were pretty brutal ......

  25. #25
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    The Lakers won a championship in the 90s?

    Jammy choosing to post stupid.
    Let me guess. You're trying to prove your stupidity knows no bounds?

    Hey, if you want to believe the Lakers 1999-2000 NBA le means they were the team of the 1990s over the Chicago Bulls, lol more power to you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •