He was responding to a post that said the lakers are always relevant. His point was that relevant!= team of the decade, dip .
You already proved your stupidity knows no bounds with 'Rip in post'.
Why would the Lakers year 2000 NBA le have anything to do with the 90s?
Fact is the Lakers won a championship in 2010 which makes them the team of the current decade thus far. And they're about to win another one.
So please tell us why the 90s, where the Lakers won zero championships, have any relevance to this decade where the Lakers are currently reigning supreme?
He was responding to a post that said the lakers are always relevant. His point was that relevant!= team of the decade, dip .
He was responding to a post that was talking about the Lakers being the odds on favorite to be team of the decade once again. And Jammy responded with the 90s Lakers which has absolutely no relevance to how things currently stand.
No go get back on your main account you failure.
Lol. I said being relevant doesn't mean a team will be the team of a given decade, for example the 1990s Lakers. The Lakers are always relevant, but they weren't the team of the 1990s.
How many times were you dropped as a baby?
You rambling off topic about the 90s Lakers had nothing to do with Amaso saying the odds are the Lakers will be team of the decade once again. Which is a fact.
Unless you missed the Lakers winning the le back in June. Wouldn't surprise me though. As the Pistons are more likely to move this decade than be gifted another fluke le because the Lakers couldn't field a healthy lineup.
You should be asking your ty mother that question.
You are very dense.
Cool thanks k bye.
Yes I'm sure tlong was laughing his ass off when you made that edgy, so stupid it doesn't even work as a joke, Blazers prediction.
You're so hilarious Jammy. K Thx Bye.
Wow, Blessings just set some history there, that was one of the worst series of posts I've ever seen on the Internet..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)