Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35
  1. #26
    NB:lol Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_ Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fa kers_ 21_Blessings's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,765
    You're trying to prove your stupidity knows no bounds?
    You already proved your stupidity knows no bounds with 'Rip in post'.

    Hey, if you want to believe the Lakers 1999-2000 NBA le means they were the team of the 1990s over the Chicago Bulls, lol more power to you.
    Why would the Lakers year 2000 NBA le have anything to do with the 90s?

    Fact is the Lakers won a championship in 2010 which makes them the team of the current decade thus far. And they're about to win another one.

    So please tell us why the 90s, where the Lakers won zero championships, have any relevance to this decade where the Lakers are currently reigning supreme?

  2. #27
    Banned
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    2,047
    You already proved your stupidity knows no bounds with 'Rip in post'.



    Why would the Lakers year 2000 NBA le have anything to do with the 90s?

    Fact is the Lakers won a championship in 2010 which makes them the team of the current decade thus far. And they're about to win another one.

    So please tell us why the 90s, where the Lakers won zero championships, have any relevance to this decade where the Lakers are currently reigning supreme?
    He was responding to a post that said the lakers are always relevant. His point was that relevant!= team of the decade, dip .

  3. #28
    NB:lol Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_ Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fa kers_ 21_Blessings's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,765
    He was responding to a post that said the lakers are always relevant. His point was that relevant!= team of the decade, dip .
    He was responding to a post that was talking about the Lakers being the odds on favorite to be team of the decade once again. And Jammy responded with the 90s Lakers which has absolutely no relevance to how things currently stand.

    No go get back on your main account you failure.

  4. #29
    Banned
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    2,047
    He was responding to a post that was talking about the Lakers being the odds on favorite to be team of the decade once again. And Jammy responded with the 90s Lakers which has absolutely no relevance to how things currently stand.

    No go get back on your main account you failure.
    lol.

  5. #30
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    You already proved your stupidity knows no bounds with 'Rip in post'.



    Why would the Lakers year 2000 NBA le have anything to do with the 90s?

    Fact is the Lakers won a championship in 2010 which makes them the team of the current decade thus far. And they're about to win another one.

    So please tell us why the 90s, where the Lakers won zero championships, have any relevance to this decade where the Lakers are currently reigning supreme?
    Lol. I said being relevant doesn't mean a team will be the team of a given decade, for example the 1990s Lakers. The Lakers are always relevant, but they weren't the team of the 1990s.

    How many times were you dropped as a baby?

  6. #31
    NB:lol Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_ Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fa kers_ 21_Blessings's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,765
    Lol. I said being relevant doesn't mean a team will be the team of a given decade, for example the 1990s Lakers. The Lakers are always relevant, but they weren't the team of the 1990s.
    You rambling off topic about the 90s Lakers had nothing to do with Amaso saying the odds are the Lakers will be team of the decade once again. Which is a fact.

    Unless you missed the Lakers winning the le back in June. Wouldn't surprise me though. As the Pistons are more likely to move this decade than be gifted another fluke le because the Lakers couldn't field a healthy lineup.

  7. #32
    NB:lol Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_ Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fa kers_ 21_Blessings's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,765

    How many times was I dropped as a baby?
    Western Conference that could become the best team in the decade out west... Portland Trailblazers..
    You should be asking your ty mother that question.

  8. #33
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    You rambling off topic about the 90s Lakers had nothing to do with Amaso saying the odds are the Lakers will be team of the decade once again. Which is a fact.

    Unless you missed the Lakers winning the le back in June. Wouldn't surprise me though. As the Pistons are more likely to move this decade than be gifted another fluke le because the Lakers couldn't field a healthy lineup.
    You are very dense.

    Cool thanks k bye.

  9. #34
    NB:lol Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_ Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fa kers_ 21_Blessings's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,765
    You are very dense.

    Yes I'm sure tlong was laughing his ass off when you made that edgy, so stupid it doesn't even work as a joke, Blazers prediction.

    You're so hilarious Jammy. K Thx Bye.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    42,293
    Wow, Blessings just set some history there, that was one of the worst series of posts I've ever seen on the Internet..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •