Even though the Bulls lost that game, I like that all the shots he took were good shots. You didn't see him force anything. Even his fadeaways & turnaround jumpers were under control and barely contested. For those too young to have seen him play, this is a great example of how dominant MJ was.
81>52
Kobe>Jordan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Seen this game. MJ's was ON that day.. but this was a horrible horrible Philly team though. Where's the defense? lol
6>5
6>2
Not being a rapist>being a rapist
pretty much sums up the Mavs ...... oh wait .....
62 > 61
Meh. Kobe can do that too. He just needs 20 more attempts.
Mike was just a player unlike any other .....
So he puts up 7 less points on 6 less FG% in a game back in 2000 when he had Shaq with him?
Man, you Laker fans sure know how to make a good point.
Exactly. If you notice in the video, this was pre-Pippen MJ. He had Brad Sellers and Sam Vincent as his 2nd and 3rd leading scorers that game with 12 and 11 points respectively.
And no one can claim that he benefited from the whistles in this game since he only took 4 FT's the whole game.
54 pts, 9 reb, 4 stls, 2 blks (both on a CENTER) in 43 minutes.
Sure enough, someone can mock Lakers fan re ed logic, then they'll show up to the thread and use the same re ed logic in a serious manner.
Jordan's flu game > 81
Let's see Kobe do something besides suck ass in the Finals.
This. Kobe is usually carried by his team.
Kobe took 20 FT's and 46 FG's, many of which were FORCED shots. He had help from the refs. Not to mention the fact the Lakers were up 15-18 points the last 5 minutes of that game, yet Phil kept Kobe in to get his stats.
Oh and this guy says O
Last edited by Dunc n Dave; 09-04-2010 at 06:40 PM.
That's why he said "on video." I don't think this game was captured on video. TBH though, imo David Robinson's 71 was a better performance than Kobe's 81 tbh.Kobe took 20 FT's and 46 FG's, many of which were FORCED shots. He had help from the refs. Not to mention the fact the Lakers were up 15-18 points the last 5 minutes of that game, yet Phil kept Kobe in to get his stats.
Oh and this guy says O
that was a bull performance. He was playing against scrub Clipper big men in the last game of the season that meant absolute jack to everyone on the court besides him because he wanted to inflate his stats and ensure the scoring le.
I'd love to hear your detailed and logical reasoning on why you think this.
tbh I love how everyone thinks the Shaq/DRob feud was all Shaq hatin on Robinson for no reason at all, yet DRob was the one who had to forcefeed himself the ball and insist his teammates do the same in order to score a lopsided amount in one game to beat Shaq for the scoring le. You think he gives a about having to score 71 points if he's chasing Hakeem or Ewing?
Look dude.....it's not about stats all the time......sometimes it's character (great ing character).....not o mention the Clippers were a championship caliber team that just caught a few breaks.....Dude, seriously.....get a life.......you follow me around on a messageboard......sad bro......really is..
As far as I know, that was the case. When Shaq entered the league, he had a chip on his shoulder regarding Robinson, supposedly because D-Rob refused to give him an autograph when he was growing up in San Antonio (a story I'm sure you know about).
Concerning comparing the two games, I can't comment. I actually didn't see D-Rob's 71 point game, but remember hearing on the sports radio later that night that he scored 71 and was like "WTF!"
I didn't see Kobe's game, either, because I couldn't give a less about a mediocre Lakers team playing an awful Raptors team in February. And when I heard Kobe scored 81, I still didn't give a .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
