those ing dogs were annoying
I think that tanks were completely pointless. But they really should not have been in hardcore.
those ing dogs were annoying
lol you guys are gonna be disappointed when this game turns out like a piece of treyarch always throws out
We'll see. My biggest problem with WaW was that it looked like and didn't even come close to competing with cod4 in terms of map design. In hindsight, the gameplay is definitely better than that of mw2. At least it didn't have gamebreaking, half-baked perks that ruined EVERYTHING else.
I don't know whether they're bringing tac inserts and OMA and danger close and and n00b tubes back, but in lieu of those things, I don't care about anything else. I'm sick of Call of Duty's engine being wasted on idiots who play the game like total pussies by exploiting developer error. And I'm sick of IW not doing about it. Two patches in one year and a still totally broken game? IW can kiss my once rock-solid loyalty goodbye.
lol treyarch is so im not expecting anything special. im going the route of "it can't possibly be worse than MW2 so im going to buy it and give it a shot"
Tac inserts, yes. OMA, no. Danger close, no. Noob tubes, yes.
My biggest wish is that they get rid of aim assist. Actually since the first COD and moreso the first COD to grace consoles they have progressivley catered to the casual player when the real players gave COD their name and constantly get on by activision with each progressive game.
and they werent in hardcore.
Air support in MW2 was ing gay as well, nothing better than having a UAV, a counter-UAV, 2 harriers, an EMP, a pavelow, and care packages coming from everywhere all the same time
That game was stupid as .
WaW is one of my favorite games ever. the gameplay and level design are awesome. people complained about the OP and overuse of the mp40, which i agree with, but that imo was the only thing i disliked about the game.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)