And you're simultaneously getting banged and sucking a . While the picture I wanted to post cannot be posted due to the rules here, even someone as stupid as you can see what I'm getting at here. I could post a picture of a chick with all over her face to indicate the bukkake that is taking place on your face in this thread if it makes you feel more comfortable since your "holding hands" joke is a stab at sexuality because you and your god think s should die.
Now you're just choosing which "religites" to side with to support your ramshackle arguments. I'll say it again: the Bible is a BOOK, nothing magical about it. Man decided what to put in and take out. The TRUTH in the Bible is immutable (go ahead, look that up), but the context is ALWAYS in flux.
And of course a business book doesn't affect humanity as a whole. It's called an analogy, re .
Oh wow, you're so helpful in explaining this to me! NOW I understand what you were implying by that picture.
[/sarcasm]
I never said I hated sexuals, nor did God say that, but go right ahead, put words in my mouth.
No your not.
There is no proof that you are
The Bible is supposed to be the word of God, not partly the word of God.
You are picking and choosing what you want to follow. Period. There is no way of getting around it.
You assert that some parts are indicative of contemporary man's beliefs and not God's, and I say bull . All of the Bible was written by man, so all of it should be fallible.
So once again, you're basically saying that you're not a Christian because the bible is a book and context is in flux? So you just choose to believe whatever you want in it? Alright, you have been defeated. Run along now little boy.
This is why you stooped to name-calling first. Intellectual superiority. Got it.
You're no better than redzero--if you want a serious discussion, we can do it over PM.
So you believe Christians when they say the Bible is the "word of God," but not when they say God exists? Who's being selective now, got?
For the nth time, the truth in the Bible is not fallable--the context of it is. And it's really not a hard concept to understand.
Hey, I'm not the one bull ting and claiming that some parts of the Bible count and some don't. You aren't being intellectually honest here, LoneStarState'sPride.
9 pages and OP never fixed link to actual article
No, Christians make the claim that The Bible is the word of God. YOU are a Christian. Therefore, you should believe that the Bible is the word of God.
You are. The Bible isn't a holy book to me; it's a collection of stories. The same cannot be said for you.Who's being selective now, got?
No, it is clearly obvious that what you label as the "truth" is just what you agree with. You can try to spin this all you want, but the facts remain the same.For the nth time, the truth in the Bible is not fallable--the context of it is. And it's really not a hard concept to understand.
I will say, LoneStarState'sPride, that it is impressive that you still manage to type your argument so valiantly with redzero's balls so far down your throat that stomach acid is singeing off his nut hair. Good for you man.
I never said some parts "count" and some don't. I'm being intellectually competent, instead, and realizing that despite the claims of some over enthusiastic believers, the Bible is still man-written at the end of the day and therefore has no intrinsic magic or something. If it were, all parts would be written with equal tenor (shoot, there's 4 different gospels for crying out loud).
I'd love to continue this convo over PM--I got other to do today, though. Otherwise, continue to cower on this bull "science" thead
which is gone when you get to Heaven.here's a new concept for you redzero.......Free will
Einstein was most assuredly a Deist... (not a Theist). Your whole argument lost merit when you failed to properly research the basis for your faux assertion.
It's pretty clear to me that you are uncapable of reasonable debate... especially when your presuppostion that those that sit across from you are somehow 'inferior' because they don't believe what you do... that argument works both ways and somehow you talk as though it doesn't apply to those on your side of the fence... who's the "stuck up" one in this context?
How am I cowering? You clearly don't have a leg to stand on. You call yourself a Christian, yet you only choose which parts of Christianity's guidelines that you want to believe.
Okay, so which parts are true and which parts aren't?
Are the ten commandments true?
Are the four gospels true?
Is the Genesis account of creation true?
Which ones are right and which ones are wrong?
BTW... can't you all just open up any one of 10,000 threads on this subject...
These threads are a forum buzzkill...
People won't change their beliefs based on what they read in this forum...
You fail.
So he's a deist and believes in a God when he just said numerous times he doesn't believe in God? Okay.In a 1954 letter, he wrote, "I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly." In a letter to philosopher Erik Gutkind, Einstein remarked, "The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."
Repeated attempts by the press to present Albert Einstein as a religious man provoked the following statement:
It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
—Albert Einstein
You guys are getting so butthurt because I said I'm superior to religites. Too ing easy. Now I know how the Mavkrew feels when trolling koriwhat
The argument that there is a God has little to no merit to begin with.
yet you just bumped this particular thread.
well done.
Who needs merit when one can have faith? That way, they can believe in whatever they want and not have to justify it to anyone, themselves included.
Did you guys here? Santa Claus is real. And don't tell me he isn't because you can't prove it. I have faith he's real so he is! Nah-nah-nah!!
Ummm check the date on those letters... and then the date of Einstein's death. Then read his official biography... and the letters to Oppenheimer... of course if that's too much work for you... go ahead and continue believing that wikipedia is the ultimate source of knowledge and truth (people's biased revisionism aside)...You fail.
You guys are getting so butthurt because I said I'm superior to religites. Too ing easy. Now I know how the Mavkrew feels when trolling koriwhat
Where is the "premature celebration" emoticon when you need one...?
If posting in a thread that was already on page one is considered "bumping" then I'm guilty...yet you just bumped this particular thread.
well done.
oh wait... you were just taking your usual jab a me? and found none other than trite material to do so...
awwwww... I'm flattered....
"BUMP"
And there in lies the truth...if you believe it...it is not a lie.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
