Reply With Quote
your choice seems to be a attention
OMG...I can't believe I read that....
And to top it off, they are keeping him around for another 3 years to prove something....
all I can say is !
your choice seems to be a attention
Yes they did choose Bonner over Scola. Sad, but true. Now let's all ing move on
that. They chose Bonner over Bowen! That is 100x worse.
Really how could you Spurs! Blah blah blah!
Hahaha...
The worst thing, they did it after being explained over and over how good Scola was and the basketball reason he would be a great player in NBA and a great fit in Houston due to his team oriented at ude....You can give tons of exuses, but hey, at the end, they preferred to keep bonner instead of getting Scola for the very same price.
Actually, they chose Oberto+Bonner over Scola+Butler.
Yes, but they choose George Hill over Mario Chalmers
While we're at it; Finley over Bowen.
Chicken dinner!
Jackson choose anywhere over Spurs. Then came some turn about a few years later.
Lee would be a great fit in our system and add some front court toughness. WTF????
and yall think my pestering of the mav "krew" is ridiculous... god these threads suck!
Oh wait, that one worked out pretty well.
Ya it worked because it was a very easy and obvious choice
I'm surprised with this run of Spurs chose ____ over ____ threads that nobody has posted the "Spurs chose Ginobili over Giricek" thread.
whooooosh
That's the sound of the joke going over the head of Laker fan.
Proof that there is a God. He wouldn't of let us make that pick....
I'm not entirely sure that was true. There were a whole lot of people who thought, given where the Spurs were in 1997, that the better choice was to trade the Duncan pick to Boston and get their 2 lottery picks.
How committed to this premise is everyone?
Believe it or not. WFT Spurs FO?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
