Reply With Quote
You tried this one before.
BBC reported the Collapse of WTC7 as it stood in the background. Seriously who would believe this anymore. Its right in front of your face.
You tried this one before.
mouse is bored again
I was watching a live football game on TV once. It was 20-0 at the end of the third quarter. Then the TV reporter came on and said the game was over and the other team had come back with three TD's in the 4th quarter to win 21-20. Then, lo and begold, in the 4th quarter, that team did come back and win 21-20! So if this could happen, WTC 7 must be legit.
BBC reported the Collapse of WTC7 as it stood in the background. Seriously who would believe this anymore. Its right in front of your face.
As usual you all stick your head in the sand....
There is no rebuttal to this obvious flaw in 911. The building was standing in the background as the news reported it collapsed. How obtuse can you be?
My rebuttal: The initial report was that WTC7 was in danger of collapsing. A contemporary CNN broadcast said it had collapsed OR was about to collapse. There was understandably a lot of confusion that day, and only an idiot would think the NWO would make a premature press release about the collapse of a 50 story building as if no one would have noticed otherwise.
In short, mouse and Rolf are idiots.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 09-10-2010 at 07:39 PM. Reason: CNN, not ABC
Seriously? Are you serious? What gives you the idea people knew that this building was damaged? And wasnt it exploded diesel generators in the basement?
You don't just say report a 47 building collapsed.
Oh let me guess claims of Osama Bin ladin being behind the attacks moments after the first plane hit was coincidence too. Dam your a buffoon.
The reports of FDNY personnel that day. They were on the scene, saw the fires and measured the deformation of the building.
What gives you the idea that the NWO had anything to gain by releasing a premature press release about the collapse of WTC7? Please be specific and don't change the subject.
You do when you are told it collapsed, however mistakenly.You don't just say report a 47 building collapsed.
Conversely, you don't just make a premature report that WTC7 has collapsed for no logical reason.
Who claimed that after the first plane hit? Where is your YouTube of that broadcast? I'm sure several terrorism experts thought that, but you'll need to give a link to a reporter's stating that right after the first plane hit.Oh let me guess claims of Osama Bin ladin being behind the attacks moments after the first plane hit was coincidence too.You can't spell.Dam your a buffoon.
does mouse get to paid to make ty trolls
Lol lets see what puke you dribble out of your mouth about this guy who was in the wtc 7 before both towers fell.
"I know what i Heard I heard explosions"
The news media covers confusing events all the time on TV. Yet they never announce unlikely major events live in TV before they happen.
FAIL.
The press gets things wrong quite often. Moreso on days filled with confusion.
And the collapse of WTC7 was a very likely event; just as it was reported.
What gives you the idea that the NWO had anything to gain by releasing a premature press release about the collapse of WTC7? Please be specific and don't change the subject.
So far, you are failing.
The collapse of the WTC was unlikely, it has never happened before or since. No steel framed building had ever totally collapsed from a plane impact or fire. During WWII there were many thousands of such plane impacts and fires.
The NWO ed up, that's why it was reported early. The NWO ed up, but they are not nearly as ed up as your ed up thinking skills. like this is never reported before it happens, more proof that you have reached your pre-ordained conclusion no matter what the facts are. The fact is, the BBC and all you dumb-ass debunkers said at first that the BBC didn't really report the collapse early, but rather, it was a time zone glitch. Then when we proved it wasn't a time zone glitch, you just made up more bull .
Uh.
The collapse of the WTC was unlikely, it has never happened before or since. No steel framed building had ever totally collapsed from a plane impact or fire. During WWII there were many thousands of such plane impacts and fires.
Those planes were quite a bit smaller. The fuel wasn't as good(IE, didn't burn as hot) either. And the planes carried a lot less of them.
so who exactly at the BBC had the forehand knowledge and what exactly did he/she gain?
The fact is, the BBC and all you dumb-ass debunkers said at first that the BBC didn't really report the collapse early, but rather, it was a time zone glitch. Then when we proved it wasn't a time zone glitch, you just made up more bull .
LOL comic sans
Didn't some media outlets report that John Paul II died right before it actually happened?
I didn't realize the media was so infallible when it comes to fact checking.
The firemen on the scene determined the building was in danger of collapsing after observing the damage and measuring the deformation of the building. That is why they evacuated the area and no one was injured when that building collapsed.
WTC7 was not hit by a plane. It was hit by one of the tallest buildings in the world. This makes you a liar.
Again, please explain why the NWO would prematurely make a press release about a 50 story building's collapse as if no one would have noticed it otherwise.The NWO ed up, that's why it was reported early. The NWO ed up, but they are not nearly as ed up as your ed up thinking skills. like this is never reported before it happens, more proof that you have reached your pre-ordained conclusion no matter what the facts are. The fact is, the BBC and all you dumb-ass debunkers said at first that the BBC didn't really report the collapse early, but rather, it was a time zone glitch. Then when we proved it wasn't a time zone glitch, you just made up more bull .
Please be specific and don't try to change the subject.
PULL IT!!
Damn, mouse believes that the US government was behind 9/11, too?
Is there any conspiracy that he doesn't believe in?
mouse, you fat , ing kill yourself because you are wasting valuable air that me and my family could be breathing.
You are a ing worthless human being.
you.
KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked
Don’t believe the charges until you’ve read the charge sheet
http://www.truthjihad.com/ksm.htm
As soon as I saw the picture of the flames that day I told my partner those buildings were coming down. Steel curtain wall structures like those can't survive it. The steel gets hot and loses it's strength and the floors pancake just like they did.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
