Reply With Quote
Silverstein said "PULL IT", you idiot. Silverstein is not a fireman. Yes, Silverstein was in on it.
so the firemen were in on it too?PULL IT!!
what did they get out of it?
Silverstein said "PULL IT", you idiot. Silverstein is not a fireman. Yes, Silverstein was in on it.
Siverstein does not have authority over the firemen, dumb .Silverstein said "PULL IT", you idiot. Silverstein is not a fireman. Yes, Silverstein was in on it.
But even so, who do you think he was telling "pull it" to?
You stupid s that want to call it a conspiracy theory. You have 364 days a year to be ing stupid, give it a rest just this one day a year!
So are you saying Silverstein wasn't in on it?
What would the NWO possibly gain from releasing information that would have been gotten eventually? The building was going to collapse, and the news media would have covered it.
Apparently the NWO is omnipotent, all-powerful and functionally re ed.
Let's have BBC report that WTC7 has already collapsed, even though everyone is standing around waiting waiting for it to fall. We'll also have CNN say that it has collapsed OR is about to collapse. It makes perfect sense. That's how we roll!
Perhaps it was the fact that firefighters were attempting to put out the fires in the building for hours. You know, the same fire that the mayor and his emergency headquarters had to flee from?
That is what gives me the idea that *someone* might have had a glimmering that the building was damaged.
Dumb. ass.
So basically people knew it was both damaged and on fire for... oh... seven or eight hours before it collapsed.After the North Tower collapsed, some firefighters entered 7 World Trade Center to search the building. They attempted to extinguish small pockets of fire, but low water pressure hindered their efforts.[29]
Fires burned into the afternoon on the 11th and 12th floors of 7 World Trade Center, the flames visible on the east side of the building.[30][31]
During the afternoon, fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30.[4]
In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon.[32]
At approximately 2:00 p.m., firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.[33]
During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.[34] Around 3:30 pm FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro decided to halt rescue operations, surface removal, and searches along the surface of the debris near 7 World Trade Center and evacuate the area due to concerns for the safety of personnel.[35] At 5:20:33 p.m. EDT on September 11, 2001, 7 World Trade Center started to collapse, with the crumble of the east mechanical penthouse, while at 5:21:10 p.m. EDT the entire building collapsed completely.[1] There were no casualties associated with the collapse.
That's how we know that someone could have maybe have thought the building might collapse.
Unless of course, you think the firefighters reporting the fires and damage were in on it too.
Blowing up a building isn't that difficult.
Long since debunked by DeNegro's firsthand testimony.Silverstein said "PULL IT", you idiot. Silverstein is not a fireman. Yes, Silverstein was in on it.
You aren't even trying anymore.
Quit trying to change the subject, Rolf. Answer the question I have asked you directly four times:
What gives you the idea that the NWO had anything to gain by releasing a premature press release about the collapse of WTC7? Please be specific and don't change the subject.
DeNegro's testimony was debunked by Lucky Larry. Nice try.
I'm still waiting for the NWO to respond to my FOIA request on that one.
So you can't even come up with a rationale.I'm still waiting for the NWO to respond to my FOIA request on that one.
You're pathetic, Rolf.
I'm not with the NWO. Who knows what drives people of evil? I don't.
Chumper, you seem to be more in tune with the NWO motives, why don't you spill the beans?
So you have no reason why the NWO would do this.
Thanks for nothing.
Again.
The NWO is evil. They don't need a reason to do evil. They hate our freedoms.
Look, you already admitted you could thing of no reason why anyone would do such a thing. We all know you make no sense whatsoever. You're done here.
Interesting, how you fail to repudiate evil.
Interesting, how you make up, fail to even make a reasonable argument and try to change the subject when you are called on it.
You're the one who expects me to explain the motives of evil people. I'm sorry, but some of the most evil people cannot be explained. They're just evil. They like to kill people and blow up buildings for sport. Basically, you are defending the terrorists. You want to give them a free pass, unless I can explain their evil motives. Sorry, chump, that ain't gonna happen. I will continue to denounce evil wherever i see it.
So there is no reason to believe the NWO planted a premature report about the collapse of WTC7.
Thanks for clearing that up, Rolf.
Evil people don't need a reason. They hate our freedoms.
They need a reason to make a foreign news service give a premature report about the collapse of a building everyone on the scene knew was going to collapse and told several other people before the foreign news service report.
You don't even have a theory. That's how stupid this is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
