Reply With Quote
And DarrinS is the connoisseur of it.
Posting preachy harangues by Dutch crypto-fascists like Geert Wilders is fully stinky. By comparison, Dennis Prager is little more than a fart stifled furtively in the davenport.
And DarrinS is the connoisseur of it.
There is nuance in the dozens of different ways DarrinS has expressed his Islamophobia, I'll give him that.
Seems like more of a blunt instrument to me.
Yeah, there isn't much nuance in DarrinS' Islamophobia here. He's making it quite obvious.
Different shades of Islamophobia. I'm sticking with the characterization.
Alinsky's rules for radicals
Rule 5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage."
It's nice to know that the dead enders on this board finally acknowledge that there are nuances when dealing with complex issues. That is a positive start on the road to an intellectual recovery....
"is a positive start"
that's going nowhere. Islamophobia is false outrage fabricated by VRWC
When 70% of Americans oppose the mosque, the only logical conclusion is that 70% of Americans are Islamophobic. Nuance.
If 70% of Americans were against a mosque then yes they would be Islamophobic.When 70% of Americans oppose the mosque, the only logical conclusion is that 70% of Americans are Islamophobic. Nuance.
Now let's not play stupid Darrins and acknowledge that the poll results can easily be manipulated by the simple wording of a question...
Another thought, why are you so obssesed with polls darrins? Do you want the country governed based on daily polling data?
Last edited by George Gervin's Afro; 09-16-2010 at 08:37 AM.
One would think.
how do these "others" feel about Islam?It is acknowledged that they have every legal right to build there in this free nation. However, they shouldn't because of the perceived smugness of the plan. To build as close to the site as possible. with all the public opposition to the plan, they are ignoring others feeling.
So you are against them building it because of someone else's perception of victory.I fail to understand how liberals miss this. their whole political correctness, and many laws based on race and gender are based on how the victim perceives an action. The action itself is re-classed by perception rather than fact.
Why is it OK for liberals to have these nuances, but not conservatives?
Feel free to share your thoughts on what opposers are if they aren't Islamophobic.When 70% of Americans oppose the mosque, the only logical conclusion is that 70% of Americans are Islamophobic. Nuance.
No darrins and his ilk are concerned that " the mosque could be a ..." lots of coulda's in their argument..typically when your argument contains 'coulda' it is extremely week...
I would also to know if the dead enders are going to consider personal feelings when dealing with other legislative matters..
So how would you answer the question in that cover?Anyone check the latest cover of Time?
Hey, Saddam "coulda" had WMD, so let's invade. Iraqis "could" love us.
Its not whether Islamaphobia is part of America today (it is - it has been - its really understandable if not acceptable) but its how Islamaphobia in America today is at higher levels than it was right after 9/11.
Now thats some . Nothing like rabble rousing to gain people power.
Interview of an ordinary Muslim at an ordinary mosque in Killen, TX.
why don't you protest in killen, darrin?
That's not an ordinary Muslim.
"I will not speak for the Muslim community."
"He is in the minority."
he's close enough to reach darrin.
I'm sure he's afraid of ordinary Muslims going on Killeen, TX sprees.
this is the perfect opportunity for darrin to put up or shut up.
any predictions?
more youtube
lol at Darrin conflating polls and logic.When 70% of Americans oppose the mosque, the only logical conclusion is that 70% of Americans are Islamophobic. Nuance.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
