The evolution of the race card in American politics

[DarrinS]

you don't even post in one of your threads.

the first page has reply worthy comments. instead, you ran away.

well, at least the right guy started this thread.

[clambake]

still running, huh?

[LnGrrrR]

I see your point.

However, there must be thousands of articles online about "racial profiling" as it relates to airport security measures and Muslim passengers.

Not following how you're relating the two.

[ElNono]

Not following how you're relating the two.

You need a YouTube?

[clambake]

I read it. I was just wondering if you did. You say you noticed his evenhandedness. I doubt that's all you noticed.

What else stood out to you?

one thing should be easy for him to answer.

irony just seems to go over some people's heads.

That's just the sort of question Darrin prefers to dodge. I'd be expecting either no answer at all or a question in response.

Darrin's total lack of self-awareness is one of the minor miracles of this board. He treats us to a chuckle on pretty much a daily basis.

that he does.

Your ilk always wants to make the thread about the person who started it, instead of the content of the thread.

Oh well.

Which comment? You didn't say.

That's entirely my point of bringing up these issues. I never call libs racists, but I point out their overuse of the race card.

Has this very subtle message from the state-contolled media gone unnoticed:

"Tea Party = racists"

you create these issues and pretend to submit them with objectivity. you're not fooling anyone.

(Darrin complains that the content gets short shrift, but he actually prefers the flame war too.)

[MannyIsGod]

LOL @ your two sentences.

You can always choose not post in one of my threads, right?

I obviously derive entertainment from your stupidity, Darrin. I just think its funny you try to run to the "you don't want serious conversation" card almost as often as you run to the race card.

Who do you honestly feel you're fooling?

[ChumpDumper]

Well, Daniel Pearl's father is against the GZM, but since his son was beheaded in Karachi, he can hardly be objective, right?

Ted Olson is for the construction of the mosque.

[redzero]

Christopher Hitchens is the man.

[Winehole23]

<burp>


^You should stick to those, WH.

You only wish. See you tomorrow.

[Winehole23]

me too..perhaps some idealism humor that went over my head.

Ding! Fries are done!

Overdone!