Reply With Quote
That's hardly surprising. You were kinda sloppy the first time around.
anyone remember the von erichs?
That's hardly surprising. You were kinda sloppy the first time around.
Motif.
Are you aware how often you use this verbal crutch, when you're killing time on ST?
I've seen you use it two or three times.
Promises, promises.
.Sometime in the future I promise to do better but not a moment sooner.
Last edited by Winehole23; 09-24-2010 at 01:47 AM.
I watched von Erich's brood and many others on Southwest Championship Wrestling on local TV late at night, way back in the day. Yer point?
Aren't we just dating ourselves now?
jujst wondering if I was the only one
Its a lot of info, links quotes and cites, including my own argument. If I make my case, it warrants a new thread. just a warning.
Thanks for the warning. That's really scary.
I just dont want all the "why start a new thread" business. It will no longer be "What about Flouride?"
It will be "Beware Flouride!!!"
b/c scare quotes and exclamation points are credibility enhancers.
Go for it, dude.
your support means the world.
I'm off to do some errands sir. a good evening to you.
Already dreaming about the le before you've verified a single thing in your research. Bold.
You do dream big, Parker but there's, ah, downsides to that. Have you read Don Quixote?
Will you spam your own thread with stupid, irrelevant pictures and YouTubes like you did this one?
@ Parker:
No seriously, have you read Don Quixote?
If not, you should do so immediately.
I would draw your attention to the comic/borderline tragic frequency of butt-whippings. Quixote and Sancho get their asses kicked routinely.
For better and for worse for the knight of mournful countenance, the power of delusion is strong.
Do windmills pump out fluoride as a waste product?
Parker can just stipulate that. He's not very particular about proof.
You have made a pretty explicit claim of motive without providing actual proof.
You have made the standard conspiracy theorist fail of confusing correlation with causality.
What proof do you have of what motivated SAWS to put floride in SA water?
Direct statements would cons ute sufficient proof.
Glibly pointing to the full moon and saying "co-incidence, I don't think so" doesn't cons ute evidence.
As for doing the math, I have done the math, more so than you seem to have.
, I even found who was supplying SAWS with floride, something you never bothered to do. It wasn't Toyota, was it?
Really?
Please provide reasonable proof of the second thesis.
What would cons ute reasonable proof:
1. Cost of disposal per gallon of floride waste product, along with chemical formulas of exact products used by specific companies.
2. Total quan ies of waste produced.
3. Total quan ies of floride sold/used for purposes of adding to drinking water.
I would LOVE to be able to do the math for myself.
Your claim, your burden of proof.
Get cracking.
I hear Parker wants to write a longer, more in-depth treatment. Maybe you could offer yourself as an editor. He sure needs one.
been done.
http://www.amazon.com/Fluoride-Decep...5623314&sr=8-1
The British Author:
"Christopher Bryson is an award-winning investigative reporter and television producer. After reporting on Guatemalan Army human rights abuses from Central America in the late 1980s for the BBC World Service, National Public Radio, and The Atlanta Cons ution, he then won a George Polk Award as part of the Jonathan Kwitny investigative team on public television’s The Kwitny Report."
Reviews:
“It is my sincere hope that Christopher Bryson’s apparently thorough and comprehensive perusal of the scientific literature on the biological actions of fluoride and the ensuing debates through the years will receive the attention it deserves and that its implications will be seriously considered.”—Arvid Carlsson, winner of the 2000 Nobel Prize in Medicine
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
