DLF's ability to bully s is underrated. He must be a really nice guy tbh, because when he wants to he owns the outa people.
Sure, you do.
Didn't you see teams fear David Clowney and Jerrico Cotchery early last year?
No?
Britt and Washington?
No?
Mason and Clayton?DLF, with the goods.The wideout-running game theory is also why teams like Indy, AZ, Houston and SD did so well running the ball last year.
DLF's ability to bully s is underrated. He must be a really nice guy tbh, because when he wants to he owns the outa people.
agree, imo. The ambchang of the NFL forum, with even more bully these s abilities.
lol neutering charger fan's tall wr theory
Good point that I missed earlier.
You aren't considered an elite slot WR until you get to 3 TDs.
At least not in my book.
I'm guessing that having Joey Harrington, Gus Frerotte, post-injury Daunte and Cleo Lemon as his QBs had more to do with Welker's production in Miami than letters in the alphabet.
Hah, DLF posts on Footballsfuture.com
I do as of last week.
That site is no fun. I've already been warned.
Here's a game:
WR Targets:
159
76
47
Catch %
57%
48%
42%
One of these guys blew in 2005. Can you guess which one it is?
Yeah, it's like the complete opposite of this site. But it's good when you want to read football.
Were your expectations for an undrafted 1st/2nd year wide receiver really that high?
You might have the worst football knowledge in the NFL forum.
If they didn't get 3 TDs each, then they all blew.
Also, since 67 catches and 1 TD is overrated and not that good, please explain why 76 catches and 2 TDs vaults you right behind the guy who you said wasn't that good when he did it.
Thanks in advance.
YAC blows.2005-06 Miami 5.9 YAC
Actually, it's 2.
Three is career total.
Before you answer with your X, Y, Z, Welker was running alone on all routes because teams were rolling coverage to Marty Booker, I'll just say this:
The Pats gave up a 2nd and a 7th to get him and immediately extended him the next day.
Was that move overrated?
As for 2005, he was the fourth option in the passing game and a 2nd year player learning the nuances of the pro game.
What exactly did you expect?
2009 27 rec 359 yds 9.7 YPC 4.5 YAC 1 TD
Edelman>Welker
if he stays healthy for a few more years, he is a HOF, idiot.
I doubt he gets into the HOF.
There are way too many HOF worthy WRs ahead of him on the outside looking in.
good three game sample.
I can see how you think his greatness far exceeds what Welker did in Miami.
Balkman's argument bombed it's bout to explode
Now I'm switchin my mind back into freak mode
If you want skirts step back and observe
I just left a gang o those over they on the curb
If Welker stays healthy for a 15 year career, at his current pace of 76 receptions per year, he would currently finish 2nd all time. Even a 10 year career at that pace would put him in some pretty elite company.
I guess if guys like Cris Carter, Andre Reed and Tim Brown are still waiting, Wes will too.
"If he stays healthy" yes.
It's not bull . You're just an idiot.
Saying either of those two things determines how good a player is just stupid.Maybe if you did anything with football or experienced it first hand at a high level, you would know something about it.
Blake's wisdom of words...
saying YPC > YAC
So apparently, Malcom Floyd, Mohamed Massaquoi, Patrick Crayton, Kenny Britt, Brian Hartline, Chris Chambers, and Hakeem Nicks are some of the best in the league?
Over Wes Welker, Miles Austin, Brandon Marshall, Andre Johnson, Greg Jennings, Hines Ward?
You saying YAC > YPC means you love Welker, dumb .
Holy I never said such a thing.saying that playing opposite of someone means physically playing on the opposite side.
Trying to say because Clark plays the Y means that he does not play opposite of Wayne because he lines up on the same side.
Holy no one that actually knows about football would never say such things.
No one actually thinks you know much about football other than what size jock strap Henne is wearing.
Lol he easily be top ten in career receptions at the current pace
Lol nothing to refute
You said I stated:
you confirmed I actually stated:saying that playing opposite of someone means physically playing on the opposite side.
Trying to say because Clark plays the Y means that he does not play opposite of Wayne because he lines up on the same side.
Who was Wayne's counterpart last year?You're apparently an illiterate dumb .thanks for confirming that Clark does not always line up opposite of Wayne and that you are talking out of your ass.
The continual self pwnage is entertaining though.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)