What about flouride?

[Winehole23]

Maybe you just couldn't handle the ambiguity anymore.

[Parker2112]

Arguing the science would lead one to think that it's related to your argument. And there is probably uniformity on the issues because the data backs up those who find no harm in the current system.

My bad. I argue too much. Remind me to argue about that whole flat earth thing later.

[Parker2112]

I thought you weren't selling anything.

Did you fall off the fence?

I am sold. Doesnt say Im selling. You are kind of a .

[Parker2112]

Maybe you just couldn't handle the ambiguity anymore.

cons utional rights are pretty clear here. The ambiguity ivolves the science.

[Winehole23]

For lower classes, to which water is necessary for life and household function, it is impossible to presume anything but public water will be used.

Impossible you say. What do people drink where there is no municipal/county source? Are there no lower classes in the country?

[Winehole23]

cons utional rights are pretty clear here.

Great, then show us the parade to the courthouse.

Such a clear violation of rights must have piqued the interest of some greedy trial lawyer by now.

[Winehole23]

I am sold. Doesnt say Im selling.

Ok. You bought something then.

If you're not selling it to us, what is this thread for?

[Parker2112]

Great, then show us the parade to the courthouse.

Such a clear violation of rights must have piqued the interest of some greedy trial lawyer by now.

This is the hole in my theory. I do intend to follow up on this. Dont assume to know what the hold up is on defending these rights. Where the EPA has set safe limits, it becomes administrative. Tackling the problem through agency enforecemnt bodies is not easy. However, we do see division within the EPA. I dont know why it hasnt been pursued, but unlike the science angle, the legal angle intrigues me, so I'll check it out.

[Blake]

its in the thread.

what page?

[Parker2112]

what page?

[Winehole23]

It's buried on page one.

[Winehole23]

On page two, Parker calls the affected population "pussies."

[Parker2112]

On page two, Parker calls the affected population "pussies."

check the sarcasm. Its there. Making fun of Chumps lack of sympathy. We had a laugh.

[Parker2112]

On page two, Parker calls the affected population "pussies."

stretch things a little more and you might begin to look like...

[Parker2112]

WH did you watch the vid?

[Winehole23]

check the sarcasm. Its there. Making fun of Chumps lack of sympathy. We had a laugh.

Actually, it looks more like he was making fun of yours.

[Parker2112]

WH did you watch the vid?

[Winehole23]

WH did you watch the vid?

No.

[Blake]

what page?

no surprise.

[Blake]

This is the hole in my theory. I do intend to follow up on this. Dont assume to know what the hold up is on defending these rights. Where the EPA has set safe limits, it becomes administrative. Tackling the problem through agency enforecemnt bodies is not easy. However, we do see division within the EPA. I dont know why it hasnt been pursued, but unlike the science angle, the legal angle intrigues me, so I'll check it out.

It's already been explained to you why it hasn't been pursued.

No surprise you ignore it and would rather post more jpegs.

[Parker2112]

It's already been explained to you why it hasn't been pursued.

No surprise you ignore it and would rather post more jpegs.

what page?

[Parker2112]

OK, so how many cancer cases have been attributed to fluoridated water?

I dont know, honestly it sounds like only pussies are affected.

or little babies.

his skepticism was already apparent. The babies makes this clear sarcasm. You left that part out. will your ulence know no boundaries?

[Winehole23]

It's a twenty page thread. You posted a large number of links. Requesting a page number isn't unreasonable.

[Winehole23]

his skepticism was already apparent. The babies makes this clear sarcasm. You left that part out. will your ulence know no boundaries?

You suggested you were responding to CD's insensitivity when in fact he was responding to your sarcasm. Misrepresent yourself much?

[Parker2112]

It's a twenty page thread. You posted a large number of links. Requesting a page number isn't unreasonable.

if that is the case, then doing the search isnt either. to me it boils down to the age old question: "Who wants to know?"