Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 71
  1. #26
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    476
    Department of Education is doing no good

    getting rid of that
    making parents teach kids at home would be better
    kids would learn more

    it is proven homeschool gets are smarter then pubic school kids


    Yes, Joe the Plumber is going to do a great job educating his kids.



    There are some ty schools and teachers out there, for sure. There are even more ty parents.

    How do you propose the single teenage mom homeschool her kids, anyway?

    , the vast majority of families live a lifestyle that requires two incomes(or the income of both parents requires it)-who will homeschool the kids then?

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    2,176
    I love it when Dems whine about how Bush increased the deficit too, as if the fact that Republicans are hypocrites makes the policy alright.

    It completely escapes them that they are still advocating the exact same policies that got us to where we are today.

    And then they call the people who say, "hey, maybe we shouldn't be doing this" crazy.

    No. Doing something the same way and expecting different results is what is crazy.

    The economy is not magically going to improve without substantial changes in how we do things. Will. Not. Happen. The laws of economics don't go away just because you don't believe in them.

  3. #28
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    I gotta agree the Federal Department of Education is pointless. They don't educate anybody. The local school districts educate the kids. The funds to educate the kids originate locally. Why do we need to send more tax dollars to Washington DC so they can hire a bunch of people in the "Department of Education" that don't have a ing thing to do with educating kids?

    Thats roughly equivalent to having a "Federal Department of Garbage Collection" that doesn't collect garbage.

  4. #29
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    I gotta agree the Federal Department of Education is pointless. They don't educate anybody. The local school districts educate the kids. The funds to educate the kids originate locally. Why do we need to send more tax dollars to Washington DC so they can hire a bunch of people in the "Department of Education" that don't have a ing thing to do with educating kids?

    Thats roughly equivalent to having a "Federal Department of Garbage Collection" that doesn't collect garbage.
    I think this is the general, (if vague), problem we are having, that I can agree with on the *true* conservative side. Government has overshot in the name of doing what's best - we need to be doing the opposite, stretching our resources to their maximum potential instead of spending where no need is apparent.

    However, it's a joke to think either party wants to do anything but spend their ass off for something or another.

  5. #30
    Veteran Sisk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    6,709
    Do you have a legitimate point to make or do you just like poking fun at other poster's terminology.

    I'm not poking fun, I'm pointing out how ridiculous it is.

    I think it is dumb on both sides. Tell me you haven't seen lib s.
    I've seen them all. They're all pointless.

  6. #31
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Post Count
    337
    A group that started at a grass root level and in the span of a little more than a year changed the political landscape is dumb?

    The message being sent to all politicians is that they were designed to be public servants, fiduciaries with we the people's best interest in mind. They have all failed miserably. Picking a side and arguing you are not as bad as the other side is what I would consider dumb.

    We are left with 2 groups to choose from. One who provides us with what they will do and the other their actual record. At least with the first choice there is some hope that they will do what they say.

    What both sides have proven time and again is that they are both horribly inefficient, arrogant and elitist. The side that pledges to create less of that is who I side with. I'll take care of educating and providing for my kids. Just get the out of the way.

  7. #32
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Repeal Obamacare.

    Sell GM.

    Stop spending borrowed stimulus money.

    Shutter about 2/3rds of the federal government beginning with the Department of Education.

    Ins ute the Fair Tax and shut down the IRS.

    Cut Obama's golfing allowance and Mic e's travel itinerary.

    There's a bout a trillion in savings...
    "about 2/3rds of the federal government"

    um ok.

    FAA?
    FDA?
    EPA?

    Yay or nay?

    What would replace them?

    Does that include the defense department? I would be all for gutting a lot of the happy fun weapons projects, and unwanted bases.

  8. #33
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121


    There are only about 4 places in the federal budget that you could cut to where it would make a difference.

  9. #34
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Shutter about 2/3rds of the federal government beginning with the Department of Education...
    Ah, a concrete proposal.

    Although the Department is a relative newcomer among Cabinet-level agencies, its origins goes back to 1867, when President Andrew Johnson signed legislation creating the first Department of Education. Its main purpose was to collect information and statistics about the nation's schools. However, due to concern that the Department would exercise too much control over local schools, the new Department was demoted to an Office of Education in 1868.

    ...

    Beginning in the 1950s, political and social changes resulted in expanded federal funding for education. The successful launch of the Soviet Union's Sputnik in 1957 spurred nationwide concern that led to increased aid for science education programs. The 1960s saw even more expansion of federal education funding: President Lyndon Johnson's "War on Poverty" called for the creation of many programs to improve education for poor students at all levels—early childhood through postsecondary. This expansion continued in the 1970s with national efforts to help racial minorities, women, people with disabilities and non-English speaking students gain equal access to education.

    1. The Department of Education—
    establishes policies relating to federal financial aid for education, administers distribution of those funds and monitors their use.


    2. The Department of Education—
    collects data and oversees research on America’s schools and disseminates this information to Congress, educators and the general public.

    3. The Department of Education—
    identifies the major issues and problems in education and focuses national attention on them.

    4. The Department of Education—
    enforces federal statutes prohibiting discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal funds and ensures equal access to education for every individual.

    http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/bu...ons/index.html


    What would replace this? Should some of it be replaced?

    Do we need national data on schools? or a national educational policy?

    Federal Pell grants? financial aid for college?

    Printing house for the blind? Technical college for the deaf?

  10. #35
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    I guess we need 50 different states, each with 50 different agencies duplicating many of these functions.

    That would be so much more efficient?

  11. #36
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Post Count
    337
    Are you assuming that in order to cut back you have to eliminate the entire department? When a corporation becomes too bloated it downsizes or sells off businesses. It doesn't seem too farfetched that each of the departments with the exception of the military can be significantly downsized.

  12. #37
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    Are you assuming that in order to cut back you have to eliminate the entire department? When a corporation becomes too bloated it downsizes or sells off businesses. It doesn't seem too farfetched that each of the departments with the exception of the military can be significantly downsized.
    Sure but then it goes back to the issue of vagueness. I personally think that pell grants and stafford loans are an incredibly important thing.

    What do you cut from the department.

    Thats what I find most distressing about political discussions in general. They are all about generalizations, emotions and very little to do with concrete policy.

  13. #38
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Post Count
    337
    Agreed. No one here can intelligently say what they would cut unless they could see where all the money is going. All we know for sure is that what is in place is horribly inefficient and in terms of oversite a complete failure. It would seem that if a department is not doing what it is intended to do you would eliminate it. Other areas scaled back.

  14. #39
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    Agreed. No one here can intelligently say what they would cut unless they could see where all the money is going. All we know for sure is that what is in place is horribly inefficient and in terms of oversite a complete failure. It would seem that if a department is not doing what it is intended to do you would eliminate it. Other areas scaled back.
    OH most certainly. Its pretty obvious that the elites in Washington intentionally keep the populace in general in the dark about specifics.

    Thats exactly why i have a ton of respect for Ron Paul. While I think a lot of his ideas are bat crazy, he is not afraid to discuss specifics. He seems to want to talk about the specifics.

    I just wish that others would actively do that beyond a federal extremist.

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    20,699
    I guess we need 50 different states, each with 50 different agencies duplicating many of these functions.

    That would be so much more efficient?
    Yes.

  16. #41
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,908
    Authority would presumably be closer to the voters, if the states themselves took over education. There'd be good and bad sides to that.

  17. #42
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Long but worthy read...

    The List: 101 Examples of Why Republicans Should Not Be Allowed to Regain Control of Congress


    Starting back in early August, and every week since then, I've concluded each Op/Ed with a list of examples of why Republicans should not be allowed to regain control of Congress this mid-term election. Beside just being generally nuts, they have made it clear what they intend to do should that happen: go back to all the Bush-era policies that nearly brought this country to its knees less than two short years ago, launch endless, pointless investigations like they did against Bill Clinton to ensure nothing gets done, shut down the government (see list for numerous links), give enormous, budget-busting tax breaks to the richest 2% of Americans already awash in cash in some inexplicable belief that giving them still MORE money will convince them to create jobs for which there is no demand, and, of course, privatize Medicare & Social Security (also, see list for multiple links). Are you tired of the Wild West, free-wheeling and reckless financial practices of Wall Street? The Republican Party isn't. And they're hoping you won't remember that's how we got here. They want to privatize everything, then deregulate it till there's no government oversight.

    (A brief comment: Please notice that I back EVERY accusation up with a confirming link. My inbox receives a steady stream of junkmail chain letters from Right-wingers recanting political horror stories of "FEMA Death camps" or how "Democrats are out to destroy America"... all with one thing in common: NO LINKS to back them up. Easiest way to tell if that political chain-letter is crap or not is whether or not it contains any links to back up their accusations.)



    The Tea Party, a fundamentalist wing of the Republican Party, differs from the GOP only in their level of fanatical extremism. The Tea Party is in lockstep with the GOP on every economic issue. Where they differ is on social issues... you know... questioning whether President Obama was even born in the United States or whether or not the minimum wage is Cons utional. One of the most amazing things about this extensive list of "Top 101 Reasons" is it only goes back six weeks to last August, and without padding from dozens of Wingnutty "Sharron Angle" and "Christine O'Donnell" quotes. The list doesn't even go back as recently as Rep. Joe Barton's (R-TX) apology to BP three months ago, upset that BP... and not the U.S. taxpayer... must pay to cleanup the oil spill in the Gulf. This week, Barton echoed Party leaders Mitch McConnell and John Boehner that the GOP has been "short or specifics" on just how exactly they'll fix all these problems they're attacking Democrats for not fixing. They don't have any answers (that you'd like). They're just hoping you won't ask them any questions before election day.

    In past weeks, we've met "The God Warriors", Joe "Everything is uncons utional" Miller (R-AK), and Rob "privatize everything" Portman (R-OH). Sharron "black is the color of evil" Angle and Christine "dabbled in witchcraft" O'Donnell require entire websites to track their history of nutty comments.

    There's former Hewlett-Packard CEO, Carly Fiorina, who was fired from HP for nearly bankrupting the company, and now running for the Senate in California, who defended her record of "outsourcing" thousands of jobs. How much of her $21 million dollar golden parachute will go to buy your vote?

    In Connecticut, Linda McMahon, the multi-millionaire wife of pro-wrestling mogul Vince McMahon, stuck a blow for feminism defending scenes like this from their WWE programming:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMh3UQKSyf8

    We've got Dr. Rand Paul (R-KY), the ophthalmologist son of Texas Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), who... like his Libertarian father... wants to cut government spending across the board... except when it comes to Medicare payments to doctors like him. Rolling Stone reporter Matt Taibbi put it best:

    This candidate, a man ostensibly so against government power in all its forms that he wants to gut the Americans With Disabilities Act and abolish the departments of Education and Energy, was unwilling to reduce his own government compensation, for a very logical reason. "Physicians," he said, "should be allowed to make a comfortable living."



    You might remember Rand best for calling the Civil Right Act of 1964 an abridgment of "freedom of speech". Or maybe for suggesting we should do away with the "Americans With Disabilities Act"? Those free-loading cripples have had it too cushy for far too long.

    The one thing Republicans, Conservatives and Teabaggers all agree upon: Extending the budget-busting Bush Tax Cuts to the "Top 2%" in the absurd belief that it will create jobs. As I've pointed out repeatedly, THE "TOP 2%" HAS BEEN RECEIVING THE BUSH TAX CUT SINCE 2002. So where are all the jobs? Not only did it not create jobs, they doubled the National Debt and created the worst job creation record since Herbert Hoover. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result each time. These people ARE insane.

    So you see, despite all their hypocrisy, idiocy and easily disprovable statements of "fact", the Teanuts are... in Matt's words... "full of ". They slept through the Bush Administration, when he doubled the National Debt and failed to prevent the worst terrorist attack in American history, then yawned as that same Administration violated eight of the first ten Amendments in the Bill of Rights, launched a war based on lies, and outed an undercover CIA agent because her husband dared expose their lies in the New York Times, all while presiding over the worst economy and ensuing economic meltdown since The Great Depression. But put a black man in the White House and suddenly we have "a lying, Socialist Marxist Muslim that pals around with terrorists" for president.

    Of course, voters need more than just reasons to NOT vote for "the other guy", they need a reason to get their butt off the couch and give Democrats more than just two years to fix what took Republicans eight years to destroy. A good place to start might be this list of 244 Accomplishments of President Obama, which is already slightly out of date.

    Now, anyone that knows me or reads this blog regularly can tell you I'm not exactly "thrilled" with the Obama Administration... mostly for all its kowtowing to the Republican minority and allowing them to set the agenda for economic reform... stressing tax cuts over government investment in infrastructure, and a lack of urgency with regards to Climate Change and a Green Jobs Program. But I also know all these things fair a FAR better chance with a Democratic Congress than if Republicans regain control.

    Since President Obama entered office, despite unprecedented obstructionism by the Republican minority, he passed the "2009 Recovery and Reinvestment Act" that gave a payroll tax CUT to 98% of all working Americans; he is keeping his promise to end the war in Iraq (remember McCain was prepared to keep troops in Iraq "for 100 years"); forced health insurance companies to offer coverage to EVERYONE by eliminating the "preexisting conditions" loophole (yes, Republicans vow to do away with that too); eliminated the infamous "prescription drug 'donut hole'" of the Republican Prescription Drug Program that stuck hundreds of thousands of seniors paying thousands of dollars out of pocket for their medications; signed the "Lilly Ledbetter Equal Pay Act" for women that Bush said he'd veto if Democrats passed it; appointed two women to the Supreme Court (including the first Hispanic); and most recently, is creating the first "Financial Products Protection Agency" that will crackdown on deceptive contracts (like the kind that led to the mortgage crisis) and outrageous credit card fees & interest rates (a law restricting changes in credit card interest rates was already passed by Obama in 2009.) None of these things would have passed under a Republican Congress, who are now promising to repeal ALL of these reforms if you put them back in charge.

    So without further ado, our "(In)Complete List of Examples Showing Why Republicans/Conservatives/Teabaggers should not be allowed to regain control of Congress (Six weeks. These are all in just the past six weeks):


    1. Gingrich Suggests Taking Out The Remaining ‘Axis Of Evil’ Members: ‘We’re One Out Of Three’. Are you tired of these budget-breaking, costly & bloody wars? The GOP isn't.

    2. Department of Defense can’t account for 96 percent of money administered in Iraq reconstruction fund (between 2003-2007, $9.1 Billion just vanished).

    3. Deficit fraud Shadegg (R-WI) can’t name a single program he'd cut to reduce the deficit.

    4. The GOP has become the "Let Them Eat Want Ads" Caucus: A look at all the Conservatives claiming people on unemployment are "lazy" and are simply "putting off looking for work".

    5. Speaking of which: TN Congressman running for governor, Zach Wamp (R-TN) Suggests Unemployed Are ‘Just Sitting Back Waiting’.

    6. Sharon Angle - The Tea Party's pick to replace Nevada Senator Harry Reid is too BSC even for Fox News with all her talk of "armed insurrection" and "Second Amendment remedies" if voters don't return Conservatives to power in Congress.

    7. House minority whip Eric Cantor Admits Extending Bush Tax Cuts Would ‘Dig The Hole Deeper’ on the Deficit and can't name a single program he'd cut to pay for it (continue reading the list and you'll find he's not the only Deficit Hawk that can't name a single thing he'd cut.)

    8. But that's not the first time a Republican admits the truth about the effect of tax cuts on the Deficit: GOP Lawmaker Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) Slips Up, Admits Tax Cuts Will ‘Increase The Debt’.

    9. Not convinced yet? Contradicting His Earlier Denial, Marco Rubio (R-FL) Admits ‘Tax Cuts Don’t Pay For Themselves’.

    10. Don't ask these guys how they'll pay for extending the Bush Tax Cuts. Either they don't know or won't say before the election because they know you won't like it (can you say "Social Security & Medicare" after they spent all of last Summer vowing to protect it?)

    11. The man in charge of rewriting history on the Bush Administration, Rove Invents Fantasy World In Which The Bush Tax Cuts Led To The Most Government Revenue Ever. (So how did they double the National Debt in six years with "all that revenue" coming in?)

    12. Tea Party Senate candidate Rand Paul (R-TN) claims mine safety regulations are unnecessary because ‘no one will apply’ for jobs at dangerous mines. - So, mines will simply go out of business after 100% of them deregulate and workers choose to starve rather than work for them? (They can just live off their Trust Funds until a better job comes along, right Rand?)

    13. Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) Can’t Think Of Any GOP Ideas That Are Different From Bush. Says Simply: We Are ‘Pro-Growth’. (whatever that means.)

    14. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell Filibusters DISCLOSE Act After Decades Of Demanding Campaign Finance Reform - As recently as 2007, McConnell was still defending his 23 year effort to require candidates to disclose who was donating to their campaigns. Now, suddenly, he's filibustering something he has fought for for years. Why? Because Democrats want it too. It's all part of "the Party of Record Obstructionism simply to deny Democrats of any achievements prior to the election. Will you reward them for it in November?)

    15. MSNBC's Rachel Maddow takes note of McConnell's flip-flop, producing video proof of numerous Republicans now vehemently opposed to programs & policies THEY themselves invented. (Can you say "Cap & Trade" McCain, Palin, Fiorina?)

    16. And WHY would Republicans now obstruct their own programs? Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) says the answer is obvious: Republicans ‘Don’t Want People To Get Jobs Before The Election’ . I think he's right.

    17. People that think like this have no business being in charge of ANYTHING: Carnival offers shoot-the-president game.

    18. On Sunday's Meet the Press, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) called for more deregulation to jumpstart the economy, then IN THE SAME BREATH, blamed a lack of regulation for the crisis on Wall Street and the oil disaster in the Gulf:

    19. GOP Repeats Balanced Budget Amendment Farce - Why is this bad? Because they are still insisting on extending the $700B budget-busting Bush Tax cut for the wealthiest 2% while (almost comically) steadfastly refusing to explain how they'll pay for it. (Can you say "Draconian spending cuts on the Poor & Middle Class"?)

    20. Back in college, Tennessee Senatorial candidate Rand Paul reportedly kidnapped a female student and forced her to worship the 'AQUA BUDDHA' (a bong) as part of a secret society. (Update: Paul denies the kidnapping, but not the 'bong worship' part.)

    21. Serial adulterer and potential 2012 presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, who spends an inordinate amount of time preaching "Family Values", dismissed his hypocrisy in a discussion with ex-wife #2 with a 'Do as I say, not as I do' defense.

    22. McCain Promises He Won’t Work With Democrats On Immigration If He Is Re-Elected. - Do you get it yet? They don't WANT to fix their made-up "problems" (ie: "campaign fundraising issues"). That's why they never challenged Roe v Wade the six years they controlled all three branches of government. There's gold in them thar race-baiting issues!

    23. "Terror Babies!" - Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert went on Fox Business Channel to make the wild claim that pregnant Middle Eastern women are traveling to the U.S. to have babies who will automatically become U.S. citizens upon birth and later return when they are older to "blow us up." - The FBI debunked him, but he continues to insist it's true. These people are delusional paranoids, and they are hoping you'll put them back in charge.

    24. Florida Senate candidate Marco Rubio thinks the way to balance the budget is simply to ban earmarks (which make up 1% of the budget) and putting every government expenditure OTHER than Defense) up for reapproval by Congress every ten years (are you ready to risk a Republican Congress reapproving Medicare and Social Security every ten years?) Oh, BTW: Every dollar of discretionary spending already has to be reappropriated every year.
    Mugsy Rap Sheet

  18. #43
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Authority would presumably be closer to the voters, if the states themselves took over education. There'd be good and bad sides to that.
    public education is already financed and controlled by city/county/state. The TX "Christian" Taleban dictate lies into millions of schoolbooks, not the Feds.

    It's the FREE MARKET Repugs who ins uted the FEDERAL No Child Left Behind and Teaching to the Test, to make sure the corps get compliant, ignorant, cubicle slaves.
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-15-2010 at 12:33 AM.

  19. #44
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,908
    Give them a little credit, croutons. They were doing an ok job of that well before NCLB.

  20. #45
    I am not redwood DJ Mbenga's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    4,579
    Repeal Obamacare.

    Sell GM.

    Stop spending borrowed stimulus money.

    Shutter about 2/3rds of the federal government beginning with the Department of Education.

    Ins ute the Fair Tax and shut down the IRS.

    Cut Obama's golfing allowance and Mic e's travel itinerary.

    There's a bout a trillion in savings...
    huckabee is that you?

  21. #46
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Yoni is an idiot....the govt will likely make a profit, yes surplus, and helped save American jobs by bailing GM...both of which wing-nuts have shown they have contempt for..

  22. #47
    Veteran
    My Team
    Utah Jazz
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    7,778
    I was in Northwestern Arizona last weekend. Let me remind you again how much I hate you for getting to live with that fantastic scenery.
    I'm sure the trip was cool.

  23. #48
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    I guess we need 50 different states, each with 50 different agencies duplicating many of these functions.

    That would be so much more efficient?

    I guess someone had to step up to say that.

    50 different departments, each with 50 different levels of funding and/or expertise, 50 different methodologies of tracking things, and 50 different legislatures dictating 50 different sets of priorities to 50 different agency heads.

    Can you explain to me how 50 duplications of effort is more efficient, or are you just going to be all hand-wavy about this?

    Should we not have some basic national standards when it comes to education, seeing as how we all tend to benefit/lose when it comes to educational levels?

  24. #49
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Far be it from me to challenge the "federal goverment is inefficient" dogma, with (gasp) actual demands of reasonable proof.

  25. #50
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    I guess we need 50 different states, each with 50 different agencies duplicating many of these functions.

    That would be so much more efficient?



    I guess someone had to step up to say that.

    50 different departments, each with 50 different levels of funding and/or expertise, 50 different methodologies of tracking things, and 50 different legislatures dictating 50 different sets of priorities to 50 different agency heads.

    Can you explain to me how 50 duplications of effort is more efficient, or are you just going to be all hand-wavy about this?

    Should we not have some basic national standards when it comes to education, seeing as how we all tend to benefit/lose when it comes to educational levels?
    You're looking for efficiency in a macro perspective. From the local, it's possibly quite a bit more efficient.
    Setting national standards is fine. Tying funding to it, not so much. When the DOE turns to enforcement is when I'm out on the concept.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •