Reply With Quote
I'm really confused now. Are you telling us that since we didn't know him personally we can't comment on his motives or beliefs?
is that a shot at republicans?My R key is broken
I'm really confused now. Are you telling us that since we didn't know him personally we can't comment on his motives or beliefs?
No, just that in a highly published case, can we know for certain these were his views.
People reinvent the dead, and God, into their image.
That's exactly what Palin does, and she's rich for it. Great in' country, lots of bright folks here...taking up all the goddamn oxygen.
How exactly does Palin reinvent the dead and on top of it gets rich off it?That's exactly what Palin does, and she's rich for it. Great in' country, lots of bright folks here...taking up all the goddamn oxygen.
This thread has potential.
i'm pretty sure stringer was referring to palin's revisionist version of the founding fathers.
What did I miss. How are her views revisionist?
well, once she was actually able to name some of them, she tried to argue that they would have been opposed to the separation of church and state.
You missed the 2008 Presidental campaign, see here:
Since then, just about every week she's pulled out some bull line and scared white people have bought it. Unfortunately for the GOP, those folks are cutting ties and unless the GOP cowers to Palin's threats about balls-out supporting of Tea Party Candidates, the GOP will crumble.
Now, don't get me wrong, I think it's awesome she's picking a fight with her own political party and being all maverick-y...but she has literally nothing to say to anyone but her base (scared white people). Americans simply don't take her seriously and so much is coming out of her mouth that it's hard to watch her speak these days. She needs ideas if she wants to get anywhere, but who needs ideas when you're making madddd cash? She certainly doesn't.
Hopey changey...
Tillman might have died for her freedoms&rights, but given the chance Sarah Palin would certainly loved to limit his.
After all, as open agnostic or atheist he would be more or less unelectable as it is.
I'd think not. How did that ever occur to you?
OIC. The OP.
What rights would she love to limit?
pitbull 's pick Joe Miller limits the right of free press by having his goons arrest reporters on public property for asking questions he doesn't want to answer. Joe a lawyer who sure knows the law.
I'm sure pitbull supports Joe The Lawyer's right to shutdown free press.
Typical chicken tea baggers don't want to face the music.
Very true. The government is not allowed to interfere with established religion.
Please show me where in the cons ution, where the church is not allowed to interfere with government?
Please... I dare you. What clause if that in the cons ution. Where is the "separation of church and state" clause?
I didn't miss any of that during the elctions. The first one is highly edited, we discussed it before. The second one, she keeps trying to explain she supported infrastructure. I recall hearing a response where she was allowed to finish her thought without constant interruption. She supported a cheaper bridge. Never knew it would cost so much. By the time the federal requirements took hold about weight capacity, size, etc. It was too expensive, and she didn't support the exuberant cost.
what does the cons uion say specifically about drugs?
It doesn't. They use the interstate commerce clause for many things that should be legal or illegal at the state level, and barred by the 10th at the federal level.
Sure, they can regulate the transactions from state to state, but... what if it never crosses state lives?
I'll ask again.
Where in the cons ution is the "Separation of Church and State?"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions