Christine gets Absolutely PWNED. Crowd laughs out loud at her.
Typical tea bagger , like mama grizzly, Angle, etc, completely uncultured and ignorant, just the way tea baggers like their women. They'd all be manipulated like dubya by the string pullers if they ever won office. It looks O'Dummell is gonna lose bad, like that tea bagging mafia asshole Paladino in NY.
Clueless ....just get naked already...
Don't worry. She will be soon. Palin is getting pretty close as well. But the patience won't last as long with Christine.
Youtube comments are awesome:
trollschool
15 minutes ago
I suppose its easy to get confused over details when you're giving head on Satan's altar.
lol tea party. The short bus wing of the Republican party.
Mediocrity, ignorance, St Ronnie's "facts are stupid", lies, propaganda are Repug/conservative/tea bagger guiding principles.
the revolt of the masses. if this is what happens every time on of 'us' champions the people then we are really screwed. the tea party has been like communism up to this point, only theoretically functional.
Keep laughing and keep dreaming - I guess that's what's keeping you going as you see the hurricane force winds coming to wipe out the democrats.
skanks takes a shot at the katrina dead.
nice.
lol stupid ing s. You and her both, are enormous morons. At least she's moderately attractive tho.
Last edited by balli; 10-20-2010 at 09:39 AM.
I don't know if I could ever vote for anyone that is unfamiliar with the 14th amendment.
but,but,but, it's not in the cons ution..
This is a depressingly sad post.
Not because the democrats might get "wiped out" , but because there are hannity/limbaugh nuthugging voters like you that would still vote a ing moron like Christine O'Donnell into office just because she is the GOP candidate.
Just incredibly depressingly stupidly sad.
Well, so far, I only watched just past the 3 minute point. At 2:50, she says "Where in the cons ution is the [not sure what she said] church and state? I couldn't make out what she said, but it was either a misstatement, or she reworded something. She was clearly asking what I did in a different post earlier. Where in the cons ution is the separation of church and state
I dare someone to show me.
Anyway, I looked for a transcript so I could figure I would watch the whole debate:
entire debate
The opening BS continues till just after 4:30, when the debate starts. Almost 10 minutes into it now. So far, she has good solid answers.
she thinks its ok for evolution to be taught in school.
Yes. So?
She's not imposing it. She's not imposing the flip side of it. She wants the local schools to decide. Not your Uncle Sam.
Can't you understand the difference?
Also...
By the time I heard the second laugh in the complete video, I think the crowd is laughing with her. Not at her.
So far, at the 30 minute mark, this debate is clearly favoring Coons. Not the outcome, but the moderator! She is holding her own real well.
let me help, again.
she thinks its ok to teach evolution in school.....and she is imposing the flip side.
Yes she does. She also thinks it's OK to teach ID.
She thinks it's OK for the local schools to dictate their own course material and disagrees with the schools being dictated what they can and cannot teach.
Can you read the written words and listed to the spoken words instead of spinning?
She's not imposing either view. She is supporting the 10th amendment.
You guys should watch this. By 58 minutes, she's kicking Coon's ass!
she doesn't think it's "ok". she thinks it should be required.
let me help you, again. she thinks its ok for local schools to decide if they teach evolution.She thinks it's OK for the local schools to dictate their own course material and disagrees with the schools being dictated what they can and cannot teach.
i've heard her speak, many times. why read it?Can you read the written words and listed to the spoken words instead of spinning?
she is clearly imposing her view, and you can't see it.She's not imposing either view.
that's why i keep saying "let me help you"
the catch phrase that lures the prey.She is supporting the 10th amendment.
All that, and no evidence.
OK...
Surly there are unedited soundbites, in context that I haven't heard if I take you at your word. In all my searched so far, I never heard any such thing, when in complete context. Surely you can show me something.
You should watch the video I linked. It's only 82 minutes and change.
I give the win to O'Donnell. Real answers, Coons, just political sidestepping, and even does what he accuser her of.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
