Reply With Quote
They skunked the Spurs.
tee, hee.
We can't know. Speculation that has no basis in reality is irrelevant. Only facts can be examined. And the facts say that Kobe had sufficient help to win the series. If not for a Tim Thomas 3, he would've.
Anyhow, Nash made shulbs like Barbosa, Tim Thomas, and Diaw look like all-stars, so anything is possible. Those players haven't done since.
They skunked the Spurs.
tee, hee.
1 white boys and 4 s
and a skunk.
and how did it go from Kobe topic to the Spurs topic?
Because bandwagon Laker fan is insecure
16 NBA World Championships withstanding.
Flaccid peter notwithstanding.
amazing, amazing thread. Props midnight! Now let's see how "real" Laker fans respond.
People who caused the defeat during the Vietnam war should stay quiet until the last days of theirs lives. TBH, losing against a bunch of little Asians was ing embarrassing.
Stay on topic. Midnight put up all those stats for you Laker fans to look at. Now let's discuss Midnight's points by staying on topic.Spin it all you want midnightpunkass. Kobe still has more rings than the Sp*rs entire franchise.
They're difficult to get aholt of. You try controlling an Oriental fire drill.
As usual Lakerfan revises history and pretends Lamar Odom wasn't on the Lakers from 2005-2007.
Btw Maurice Evans wasn't even on the Lakers during the 2006 season, but one seldom expect Lakerfan to know anything about the 2005-2007 Lakers, since they didn't really watch them.
Great thread.
I knew kobe's career has been drastically overrated but the closer you look the worst it gets. Thanks for opening my eyes even wider.
Kobe: 5
Duncan: 4
That's pretty much what I took from the series. Though PHX easily won scoring margin in the series because of the blowouts in Games 5 and 7, the Lakers could've easily won the series. It wasn't just Thomas hitting a 3, it was the fact that he even got to take that shot in the first place because the Lakers couldn't secure their own defensive boards that really stung.
I remember that moment vividly. Ouch.
The road was wide open that year, too. They would've faced the Clippers in the 2nd round... and of course that series was eminently winnable. There's never been a hallway series in the history of the NBA and you'd have to think the Lakers would've had a pretty decent "home on the road" crowd even for their away games. The Clippers were very good that year but not exactly a great team.
Then it likely would've been Dallas in the WCFs... they would've been big favorites, but like the Suns I think beatable for the Lakers -- certainly a better draw than the Spurs.
Then Miami in the Finals? Shaq vs. Kobe? Would've been a crazy series.
Oh, what could've been.
^That loss hurt more than the joy of 15 & 16.
Luva, per usual, with the goods.
the topic is Kobe don't try to change it as you always do
Troll threads are fair game imo
What's worse quiting a game or quiting for 3 years straight?
oh ya
Quit Hatin'
I don't know. Ask Kobe. He quit in a game and quit for 5 years straight when he was shooting his team out of the Finals against the Pistons, leading the Lakers to the lottery, choking a 3-1 lead to the Suns, losing to the Suns again, blowing a 24 point lead at home in the Finals, which concluded in a 39 point beatdown.
Dude, your obsession is unparralled. I wish you were born around the time Jordan was leading the league. Things would be have interesting back then.
Great Harlem Heat impersonation lately. Kudos to you.
You've no room, Mid. Your Rodman quit in the playoffs as well. If he hadn't you may very well have 5 right now instead of only 4.
What he do after that? o ya he rang twice.
Quit Hatin'
Please love my Kobe
Care to address the content of my original post? It's not blind hate, despite what you might believe. I back up my argument with statistics and analysis.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
